| Literature DB >> 30404627 |
Chung-Ho E Lau1, Alexandros P Siskos2,3, Léa Maitre4,5,6, Oliver Robinson7, Toby J Athersuch2,7, Elizabeth J Want2, Jose Urquiza4,5,6, Maribel Casas4,5,6, Marina Vafeiadi8, Theano Roumeliotaki8, Rosemary R C McEachan9, Rafaq Azad9, Line S Haug10, Helle M Meltzer10, Sandra Andrusaityte11, Inga Petraviciene11, Regina Grazuleviciene11, Cathrine Thomsen10, John Wright9, Remy Slama12, Leda Chatzi13, Martine Vrijheid4,5,6, Hector C Keun3, Muireann Coen14,15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Environment and diet in early life can affect development and health throughout the life course. Metabolic phenotyping of urine and serum represents a complementary systems-wide approach to elucidate environment-health interactions. However, large-scale metabolome studies in children combining analyses of these biological fluids are lacking. Here, we sought to characterise the major determinants of the child metabolome and to define metabolite associations with age, sex, BMI and dietary habits in European children, by exploiting a unique biobank established as part of the Human Early-Life Exposome project ( http://www.projecthelix.eu ).Entities:
Keywords: Birth cohorts; Epidemiology; European children; Exposome metabolomics; LC-MS; Metabolic phenotyping; Metabolic profile; Metabonomics; NMR spectroscopy; Paediatrics
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30404627 PMCID: PMC6223046 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1190-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med ISSN: 1741-7015 Impact factor: 8.775
Sample population characteristics in the HELIX subcohort study
| Overall | BiB | EDEN | INMA | KANC | MoBa | Rhea | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | 1192 | 199 | 157 | 207 | 201 | 229 | 199 |
| Female (%) | 45.4 | 46.2 | 42.0 | 44.9 | 45.8 | 48.0 | 44.2 |
| Male (%) | 54.6 | 53.8 | 58.0 | 55.1 | 54.2 | 52.0 | 55.8 |
| White European (%) | 89.6 | 42.7 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 95.6 | 100 |
| BAME (%) | 10.4 | 57.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.4 | 0 |
| Age (years) | 7.4 (6.5–8.9) | 6.6 (6.4–6.8) | 10.8 (10.3–11.2) | 8.8 (8.4–9.3) | 6.4 (6.1–6.8) | 8.5 (8.2–8.8) | 6.5 (6.4–6.6) |
| BMI (z-score) | 0.3 (− 0.4–1.2) | 0.1 (− 0.4–0.9) | 0.2 (−0.5–1.2) | 0.7 (− 0.1–1.7) | 0.4 (− 0.3–1.2) | 0.1 (− 0.4–0.6) | 0.6 (− 0.3–1.6) |
NB. BAME indicates Black and Asian Minority Ethnic group. For age and BMI, median values and interquartile range in parentheses are presented
Dietary intake of 11 main food groups
| Overall | BiB | EDEN | INMA | KANC | MoBa | Rhea | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cereal | 18.5 (12.5–26) | 17 (13.1–23.5) | 21.5 (13–27.5) | 17 (11.4–24.1) | 14 (9.3–22) | 25 (19–29.6) | 16 (12.1–23.5) |
| Meat | 7.5 (5.1–10) | 6 (4–9) | 7.5 (5.5–10) | 8 (7–12) | 7.1 (5.1–10) | 7.5 (5–10.5) | 6.5 (5–7.6) |
| Fish | 2 (1.1–3.5) | 2 (1–3.3) | 2.1 (1.5–3) | 3.6 (2.4–5) | 1.1 (0.4–1.6) | 2.6 (1.6–5) | 1.5 (1–2) |
| Dairy | 19.8 (12.5–27.6) | 24 (17.2–31.6) | 24 (15–31) | 18.1 (13.8–25.8) | 11 (8–17) | 20 (12.3–27) | 22.5 (15.1–28.5) |
| Lipids | 4.5 (1–8.5) | 7 (4–10) | 6 (3.1–9) | 1 (0.3–3.1) | 7 (4–11) | 7.5 (4–15.5) | 1 (0.1–3) |
| Potatoes | 3.5 (2–4) | 4 (3.1–6) | 3.1 (1.5–4) | 3.5 (2–4) | 3.1 (3–5.6) | 3.1 (1.1–3.1) | 3.5 (2–4) |
| Vegetables | 6.5 (4–10) | 6 (4–10) | 8 (4–11) | 6 (3–8.5) | 6 (3.5–8.5) | 8.5 (6–14) | 6.5 (4–10) |
| Fruits | 8.8 (5.9–18) | 15.5 (10–21) | 6.6 (3.3–13.6) | 7.5 (3.7–13.2) | 7.4 (3.8–10) | 14 (8.6–21) | 8.5 (6.2–13.5) |
| Sweets | 6.6 (3.5–10) | 6.6 (3.6–10) | 8.5 (5–14) | 4.5 (2–8.1) | 9.5 (7–15.5) | 5 (3–7.5) | 6 (3.3–7.5) |
| Bakery products | 4 (1.5–6.5) | 4 (2–7.5) | 5.6 (2–8) | 4 (3–6.5) | 4 (2–6.5) | 1.5 (1–2) | 6 (4–8.5) |
| Beverages | 0.5 (0–1) | 0.5 (0–1.8) | 1 (0.3–3) | 0.5 (0–1.3) | 0.5 (0.1–1) | 0.6 (0.1–1.1) | 0.1 (0–0.5) |
Data represent portion consumed per week. Median values with interquartile range given in parentheses or percentages as indicated
Fig. 1Metabolic differences between the six cohorts. a Serum metabolites. b Urine metabolites. Colour represents standardised mean difference between cohorts; blue—metabolite levels lower than average, and red—metabolite levels higher than average. P values were assessed by ANOVA, and significant metabolites after multiple testing correction are shown. Using multiple linear regression models metabolic data were pre-adjusted for analytical batch and run order, age, sex, zBMI, frequency of weekly dietary intake of the 11 food groups, and a sampling type in the case of urine and postprandial interval in the case of serum, prior to ANOVA analysis. BiB (UK), EDEN (France), KANC (Lithuania), MoBa (Norway), Rhea (Greece), INMA (Spain)
Fig. 2Pre-analytical factor effects on the children’s metabolome. a Postprandial effects on serum metabolites (adjusted for age, sex, zBMI)—meta-analysis after stratifying by cohorts with estimates representing the change in metabolite SD per hour postprandial and error bar indicating 95% confidence interval. b Diurnal effects on urine metabolites. Only t test adjusted p < 0.05 are shown (n = 48 for morning and n = 37 for night samples). The estimates indicate the standardised mean differences between the morning and night samples, with the error bars indicating the 95% confidence intervals. Metabolites found higher in the morning void samples are shown as positive and metabolites found higher in night-time void samples are shown as negative
Fig. 3Sex associations with 1H NMR urine and serum metabolites in children—meta-analysis after stratifying by cohorts. Regression models were adjusted for covariates, and Bonferroni correction was used to adjust for multiple testing. The estimates represent the metabolite standardised mean difference between males and females with the error bars indicating the 95% confidence intervals. Metabolites found higher in male children are shown as positive, and metabolites found higher in female children are shown as negative
Fig. 4Urine and serum metabolites associated with BMI z-score—meta-analysis after stratifying by cohorts. Regression models were adjusted for analytical batching, postprandial effect (for serum), sampling (urine), age, sex and dietary intakes of the 11 main food groups
Fig. 5Metabolites associated with dietary intake frequencies (weekly). Weekly dietary frequency intake data of the 11 main food groups (cereal, meat, fish, dairy, lipids, potatoes, vegetables, fruits, sweets, bakery products, beverages) were collected via food frequency questionnaire, and multiple linear regression analysis followed by meta-analysis were performed on each metabolite—dietary factor pair. Regression models were adjusted for analytical batching, postprandial effect (for serum), sampling (urine), age, sex and zBMI score
Fig. 6Variance decompositions of LC-MS/MS serum and NMR urine metabolic profiles. Using a partial R2 approach, regression models were performed on each of the 44 urinary metabolites and on each of the 177 serum metabolites. Variables included in the model: batch (analytical), run order (analytical), time of sampling (urine pre-analytical), postprandial interval (serum pre-analytical), sample processing time (pre-analytical), sex (demographic), age (demographic), BMI z-score (demographic), ethnicity (demographic), 11 dietary intake frequencies (dietary) and cohort
Fig. 7Serum metabolic correlation network diagram generated using MetScape (Cytoscape) based on metabolite pairwise correlations (“edge”) either < − 0.5 or > 0.65
Fig. 8Urinary metabolic correlation heatmap diagram. Colour represents Pearson correlation coefficients and only significant correlations after Bonferroni correlations (p value threshold = 5.3 × 10−5) are shown