Literature DB >> 27628670

Workflow for Integrated Processing of Multicohort Untargeted 1H NMR Metabolomics Data in Large-Scale Metabolic Epidemiology.

Ibrahim Karaman1, Diana L S Ferreira1, Claire L Boulangé2, Manuja R Kaluarachchi2, David Herrington3, Anthony C Dona2,4, Raphaële Castagné1, Alireza Moayyeri1, Benjamin Lehne1, Marie Loh1, Paul S de Vries5, Abbas Dehghan5, Oscar H Franco5, Albert Hofman5, Evangelos Evangelou1,6, Ioanna Tzoulaki1,6, Paul Elliott1, John C Lindon2,4, Timothy M D Ebbels2,4.   

Abstract

Large-scale metabolomics studies involving thousands of samples present multiple challenges in data analysis, particularly when an untargeted platform is used. Studies with multiple cohorts and analysis platforms exacerbate existing problems such as peak alignment and normalization. Therefore, there is a need for robust processing pipelines that can ensure reliable data for statistical analysis. The COMBI-BIO project incorporates serum from ∼8000 individuals, in three cohorts, profiled by six assays in two phases using both 1H NMR and UPLC-MS. Here we present the COMBI-BIO NMR analysis pipeline and demonstrate its fitness for purpose using representative quality control (QC) samples. NMR spectra were first aligned and normalized. After eliminating interfering signals, outliers identified using Hotelling's T2 were removed and a cohort/phase adjustment was applied, resulting in two NMR data sets (CPMG and NOESY). Alignment of the NMR data was shown to increase the correlation-based alignment quality measure from 0.319 to 0.391 for CPMG and from 0.536 to 0.586 for NOESY, showing that the improvement was present across both large and small peaks. End-to-end quality assessment of the pipeline was achieved using Hotelling's T2 distributions. For CPMG spectra, the interquartile range decreased from 1.425 in raw QC data to 0.679 in processed spectra, while the corresponding change for NOESY spectra was from 0.795 to 0.636, indicating an improvement in precision following processing. PCA indicated that gross phase and cohort differences were no longer present. These results illustrate that the pipeline produces robust and reproducible data, successfully addressing the methodological challenges of this large multifaceted study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NMR; alignment; epidemiology; large scale; metabolomics; multicohort; normalization; preprocessing; quality control

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27628670     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  16 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in NMR-Based Metabolomics.

Authors:  G A Nagana Gowda; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  On-demand virtual research environments using microservices.

Authors:  Marco Capuccini; Anders Larsson; Matteo Carone; Jon Ander Novella; Noureddin Sadawi; Jianliang Gao; Salman Toor; Ola Spjuth
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2019-11-11

Review 3.  Considerations when choosing a genetic model organism for metabolomics studies.

Authors:  Laura K Reed; Charles F Baer; Arthur S Edison
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 4.  Recommended strategies for spectral processing and post-processing of 1D 1H-NMR data of biofluids with a particular focus on urine.

Authors:  Abdul-Hamid Emwas; Edoardo Saccenti; Xin Gao; Ryan T McKay; Vitor A P Martins Dos Santos; Raja Roy; David S Wishart
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.290

5.  Improving Visualization and Interpretation of Metabolome-Wide Association Studies: An Application in a Population-Based Cohort Using Untargeted 1H NMR Metabolic Profiling.

Authors:  Raphaële Castagné; Claire Laurence Boulangé; Ibrahim Karaman; Gianluca Campanella; Diana L Santos Ferreira; Manuja R Kaluarachchi; Benjamin Lehne; Alireza Moayyeri; Matthew R Lewis; Konstantina Spagou; Anthony C Dona; Vangelis Evangelos; Russell Tracy; Philip Greenland; John C Lindon; David Herrington; Timothy M D Ebbels; Paul Elliott; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Marc Chadeau-Hyam
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Determinants of accelerated metabolomic and epigenetic aging in a UK cohort.

Authors:  Oliver Robinson; Marc Chadeau Hyam; Ibrahim Karaman; Rui Climaco Pinto; Mika Ala-Korpela; Evangelos Handakas; Giovanni Fiorito; He Gao; Andy Heard; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Matthew Lewis; Raha Pazoki; Silvia Polidoro; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Matthias Wielscher; Paul Elliott; Paolo Vineis
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 9.304

7.  Determinants of the urinary and serum metabolome in children from six European populations.

Authors:  Chung-Ho E Lau; Alexandros P Siskos; Léa Maitre; Oliver Robinson; Toby J Athersuch; Elizabeth J Want; Jose Urquiza; Maribel Casas; Marina Vafeiadi; Theano Roumeliotaki; Rosemary R C McEachan; Rafaq Azad; Line S Haug; Helle M Meltzer; Sandra Andrusaityte; Inga Petraviciene; Regina Grazuleviciene; Cathrine Thomsen; John Wright; Remy Slama; Leda Chatzi; Martine Vrijheid; Hector C Keun; Muireann Coen
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Reliability of plasma polar metabolite concentrations in a large-scale cohort study using capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Sei Harada; Akiyoshi Hirayama; Queenie Chan; Ayako Kurihara; Kota Fukai; Miho Iida; Suzuka Kato; Daisuke Sugiyama; Kazuyo Kuwabara; Ayano Takeuchi; Miki Akiyama; Tomonori Okamura; Timothy M D Ebbels; Paul Elliott; Masaru Tomita; Asako Sato; Chizuru Suzuki; Masahiro Sugimoto; Tomoyoshi Soga; Toru Takebayashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Beyond genomics: understanding exposotypes through metabolomics.

Authors:  Nicholas J W Rattray; Nicole C Deziel; Joshua D Wallach; Sajid A Khan; Vasilis Vasiliou; John P A Ioannidis; Caroline H Johnson
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.639

Review 10.  An Overview of Metabolic Phenotyping in Blood Pressure Research.

Authors:  Ioanna Tzoulaki; Aikaterini Iliou; Emmanuel Mikros; Paul Elliott
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.