| Literature DB >> 30400469 |
Muhammad Javaid Afzal1, Shahzadi Tayyaba2, Muhammad Waseem Ashraf3, M Khalid Hossain4, M Jalal Uddin5, Nitin Afzulpurkar6.
Abstract
Bioengineered veins can benefit humans needing bypass surgery, dialysis, and now, in the treatment of varicose veins. The implant of this vein in varicose veins has significant advantages over the conventional treatment methods. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT), vein patch repair, pulmonary embolus, and tissue-damaging problems can be solved with this implant. Here, the authors have proposed biomedical microdevices as an alternative for varicose veins. MATLAB and ANSYS Fluent have been used for simulations of blood flow for bioengineered veins. The silver based microchannel has been fabricated by using a micromachining process. The dimensions of the silver substrates are 51 mm, 25 mm, and 1.1 mm, in length, width, and depth respectively. The dimensions of microchannels grooved in the substrates are 0.9 mm in width and depth. The boundary conditions for pressure and velocity were considered, from 1.0 kPa to 1.50 kPa, and 0.02 m/s to 0.07 m/s, respectively. These are the actual values of pressure and velocity in varicose veins. The flow rate of 5.843 (0.1 nL/s) and velocity of 5.843 cm/s were determined at Reynolds number 164.88 in experimental testing. The graphs and results from simulations and experiments are in close agreement. These microchannels can be inserted into varicose veins as a replacement to maintain the excellent blood flow in human legs.Entities:
Keywords: ANSYS; bioMEMS; bioengineered vein; fuzzy logic; microchannels; microfluidics; varicose vein
Year: 2017 PMID: 30400469 PMCID: PMC6189736 DOI: 10.3390/mi8090278
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Microchannel classification.
Figure 2(a) Tortuous veins; (b) normal ascending sinusoidal veins which becomes varicose veins; and (c) swelled varicose veins.
Extensive details of different microchannels. PEFC: Polymer electrolyte fuel cell; WEDM: Wire electric discharge machining; PEM/GDL: Gas diffusion layer and GDL/GFC: Gas flow channel.
| References | Length | Channel Type | Fabrication Technique | Fluid | Flow Rate | Simulation/Experiment | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abed et al. [ | 95 mm | Trapezoidal | Not reported | Water | Not reported | ANSYS Fluent 6.3 | Heat exchangers |
| Shojaeian and Kosar [ | 1000 µm | Circular | Not reported | Water | Not reported | ANSYS Fluent 14.0 | Heat transfer characteristics |
| Zhang et al. [ | 45 × 20 × 2 mm3 | Straight rectangular | WEDM | Water | 4.8 mL/min | Experiment | Heat transfer characteristics |
| Afzal and Kim [ | 2.8 mm | Straight and serpentine | Not reported | Blood | Not reported | ANSYS CFD | Flow dynamics and mixing behavior |
| Ashrafi et al. [ | 4 mm | Straight and serpentine | Not reported | Water | Not reported | Numerical | PEM fuel cells |
| Cardiel et al. [ | 2 cm | T-shaped | Standard soft lithography | Water | 4000 μL/h | Not Reported | Instability behavior of membranes |
| Masuda et al. [ | 30 × 3.2 mm2 | Straight | Simple machining process | Water | 58,116 and 232 cm3/min | PEFC | Mass transportation PEM/GDL and GDL/GFC |
| Nishimura and Matsune [ | 14 mm | Sinusoidal | Simple machining process | Water | 2.5 m3/s | Experiment | Heat transfer characteristics |
| Lu et al. [ | 183 mm | Sinusoidal | Simple machining process | Water/air | 0.02–0.2 mL/min | Experiment | PEM fuel cell |
Ranges of membership functions.
| Membership Functions | Reynolds Number | Pressure (kPa) | Curve Height (mm) | % Loss | Flow Rate (0.1 nL/s) | Velocity (cm/s) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranges | MFs | Ranges | MFs | Ranges | MFs | Ranges | MFs | Ranges | MFS | Ranges | MFs | |
| MF1 | 0–500 | SMALLEST | 1–1.25 | LOW | 5–6 | SMALL | 0.1–0.55 | SMALL | 0–5 | SMALL | 2–4.5 | SMALL |
| MF2 | 0–1000 | SMALLER | 1–1.5 | MEDIUM | 5–7 | MEDIUM | 0.1–1 | MEDIUM | 0–10 | MEDIUM | 2–7 | MEDIUM |
| MF3 | 500–1000 | SMAL | 1.25–1.5 | HIGH | 6–7 | HIGH | 0.55–1 | LARGE | 5–10 | HIGH | 4.5–7 | HIGH |
Figure 3(a) Ascending sinusoidal microchannel (ASMC) by using fuzzy logic based inference system editor; (b) MATLAB Rule Viewer.
Figure 4The 3D surface viewer graphs. (a) The dependency of flow rate on % loss and curve height. (b) The dependency of flow rate on pressure and curve height. (c) The dependency of flow rate on % loss and pressure. (d) The dependency of flow rate on Reynolds number and pressure. (e) The dependency of flow rate on curve height and Reynolds number. (f) The dependency of flow rate on % loss and Reynolds number. Figure 4g presents the dependency of velocity on % loss and curve height. (h) The dependency of flow rate on pressure and curve height. (i) The dependency of velocity on % loss and pressure. (j) The dependency of velocity on Reynolds number and pressure. (k) The dependency of velocity on curve height and Reynolds number. (l) The dependency of velocity on % loss and Reynolds number.
Comparison between Mamdani’s value and MATLAB simulation.
| Category | Flow Rate (0.1 nL/s) | Velocity (cm/s) |
|---|---|---|
| Mamdani’s value | 5.15 | 4.65 |
| MATLAB simulation | 5.11 | 4.55 |
| Difference | 0.04 | 0.1 |
| Error percentage | 0.78% | 2.19% |
Figure 5(a) Dimensions of microchannels; (b) mesh analysis; (c) contour plot for velocity; (d) contour plot for pressure across the microchannel.
Figure 6(a) Pressure difference vs Reynolds number; (b) bar graph between % increase in flow rate and Reynolds number; (c) graph between flow rate and Reynolds number across the ascending sinusoidal microchannels.
Figure 7(a–h) Schematic and actual fabrication by micromachining.
Figure 8Experimental setup.
Figure 9Comparison of graphs between Reynolds number and pressure difference in simulations and experiments (a) at 80 Pa; (b) at 90 Pa; (c) at 100 Pa; (d) percentage decrease from simulated data to experimental data; and (e) Reynolds number vs. flow rate in testing.
Comparison between simulated values and experimental values.
| MATLAB Results | ANSYS Results | Experimental Results |
|---|---|---|
| Reynolds Number = 160 | Reynolds Number = 161.33 | Reynolds Number = 164.88 |
| Flow Rate = 5.11 (0.1 nL/s) | Flow Rate = 6.0 (0.1 nL/s) | Flow Rate = 5.8 (0.1 nL/s) |
| Velocity = 4.55 (cm/s) | Velocity = 6.088 (cm/s) | Velocity = 5.8 (cm/s) |