| Literature DB >> 21747700 |
Muhammad Waseem Ashraf1, Shahzadi Tayyaba, Nitin Afzulpurkar.
Abstract
Micro Electromechanical Systems (MEMS) based microfluidic devices have gained popularity in biomedicine field over the last few years. In this paper, a comprehensive overview of microfluidic devices such as micropumps and microneedles has been presented for biomedical applications. The aim of this paper is to present the major features and issues related to micropumps and microneedles, e.g., working principles, actuation methods, fabrication techniques, construction, performance parameters, failure analysis, testing, safety issues, applications, commercialization issues and future prospects. Based on the actuation mechanisms, the micropumps are classified into two main types, i.e., mechanical and non-mechanical micropumps. Microneedles can be categorized according to their structure, fabrication process, material, overall shape, tip shape, size, array density and application. The presented literature review on micropumps and microneedles will provide comprehensive information for researchers working on design and development of microfluidic devices for biomedical applications.Entities:
Keywords: drug delivery system; microfluidics; microneedles; micropumps
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21747700 PMCID: PMC3131584 DOI: 10.3390/ijms12063648
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Schematic illustration of transdermal drug delivery (TDD) system.
Figure 2Schematic of nozzle/diffuser element.
Figure 3Piezoelectric micropump.
Figure 4Electrostatic micropump.
Figure 5Thermopneumatic micropump.
Figure 6Electromagnetic micropump.
Figure 7Bimetallic micropump.
Figure 8ICPF micropump.
Figure 9Phase change micropump.
Figure 10SMA micropump.
Recently reported mechanical micropumps.
| Reference | Actuation Method | Materials used for fabrication | Size | Pumping Chamber | Pumping Medium | Valve | Voltage (V) | Frequency | Back Pressure/Applied Pressure | Flow Rate (μL/min) | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Piezoelectric | Polycarbonate (PC), PMMA, PDMS, PZT, (Titanium) Ti | 15 × 8 mm | 4 | Insulin | 2 | 36 | 200 Hz | 22 kPa | 6.23 × 10−5 mL/min | Insulin therapy system | |
| Piezoelectric | Polyetheretherketone/PDMS/Metal/Ceramics | Not reported | 1 | Air/Water | 2 | 100 | 225 Hz for air, 17 Hz for water | Not reported | 39 mL/min for air, 1.8 mL/min for water | Drug delivery applications | |
| Piezoelectric | Si/Epoxy H31/PZT-5A | 14.5 × 9 × 1.1 mm | 1 | Not reported | 2 | 240 | 20–100 Hz | 0–10 psi | 0.52 mL/min | Microfluidic applications | |
| Electromagnetic | PC, Plexiglass | 16 × 18 mm | 1 | Water | Not report ed | Not reported | Not reported | 785 Pa | 13.7 mL/min | Biomedical applications | |
| Electromagnetic | PDMS, Glass | 24 × 40 × 0.4 mm | 3 | Water | 2 | 0.7 | 12 Hz | 70 mbar | 2.4 mL/min | Portable LOC applications | |
| Electrostatic | Si | Not reported | 2 | Gas | 19 | Not reported | 2.2–2.8 KHz | 7.3–3.3 kPa | 0.29–0.07 SCCM | Not reported | |
| Electrostatic | Si, Glass | 7 × 4 × 1 mm | 3 | Not reported | 3 | 18.5 | 50 Hz | Not reported | 9.1 μL/min | Drug delivery applications | |
| Thermopneumatic | PDMS, Glass | 16 × 18 × 5 mm | 3 | Not reported | Not reported | 9 | 1.2 Hz | 490 Pa | 20.01 μL/min | Biomedical applications | |
| Thermopneumatic | PDMS, PMMA | Not reported | 3 | Compressed air | 3 | Not reported | 10 Hz | 138 kPa | 96 μL/min | Microfluidic devics | |
| Bimetallic | Al, Si, Glass | 13 × 7 × 2 mm | 2 | Gas/Water | 2 | 15 | Not reported | 0.5 kPa | 5.6 μL/s | Not reported | |
| ICPF | PDMS, Polypyrrole, Stainless steel, Polyvinylidene fluoride | 25 × 25 × 10 mm | 1 | Water | 4 | 4 | 0.5 Hz | 1.3 kPa | 1260 μL/min | Biomedical devices | |
| Phase Change | Al, Silicon, Silicone rubber, Glass | Not reported | 1 | Water | 2 | 8 | 2 Hz | 0 mm H2O | 97 μL/min | Not reported | |
| SMA | Ti, Nickel (Ni), Copper (Cu) | 8 × 8 × 1.8 mm | 1 | DI water | 2 | Not reported | 80 Hz | Not reported | 235 μL/min | Not reported |
Figure 11EO micropump.
Figure 12EW micropump.
Figure 13Electrochemical micropump.
Figure 14Evaporation micropump.
Figure 15Bubble micropump.
Figure 16MHD micropump.
Figure 17FPW micropump.
Figure 18EHD micropump.
Recently reported non-mechanical micropumps.
| Reference | Actuation Method | Material used for Fabrication | Size | Pumping Chamber | Pumping Medium | Valve | Voltage (V) | Frequency | Back Pressure/Applied Pressure | Flow Rate (μL/min) | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bubble type | PDMS, Glass, Si | Not reported | 2 | DI water, Phosphate- buffered solution | Not reported | 5 | 300 Hz | Not reported | 37.8 μL/min | Miniature electronic devices | |
| Bubble type | Si, Pyrex glass | Not reported | 1 | DI water | Not reported | 30 | 0.5–2.0 Hz | Not reported | 6–8 μL/min | Microfluidic applications | |
| EHD | Polymer, Carbon, Glass | Not reported | Not reported | Fluorinert | Not reported | 500 | Not reported | 23 Pa | 400 μL/min | Microfluidic devices | |
| EHD | Al | 1500 × 200 × 50 μm | 1 | Water | Not reported | 3.3 | 373 kHz | Not reported | 10.5 μL/min | Microchannel cooling system | |
| EO | Glass, Platinum | Not reported | Not reported | Borate buffer, DI water | Not reported | 2.9 | Not reported | 1.6 kPa | 13 μL/min | Drug delivery | |
| EO | Glass, PDMS | Not reported | 2 | Water | 1 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | 0.33 μL/min | Perfusion cell culture | |
| MHD | Au (gold), PDMS | Not reported | Not reported | PBS solution | Not reported | 3.6 | Not reported | Not reported | 2.83 μL/min | LOC applications | |
| MHD | Si, Pyrex glass, Al | 40 × 25 × 1 mm | Not reported | PBS solution | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | 100000N/m2 | 0.3 μL/min | Drug delivery | |
| EW | Glass, Si, Platinum | Not reported | 2 | Mercury | 2 | 2.3 | 25 Hz | 800 Pa | 70 μL/min | Biomedical Devices | |
| Electrochemical | Ppy, PDMS, PMMA | 5.6 × 16 × 26 mm | 1 | Water | 2 | ±1.5 | Not reported | 11 mbar | 52 μL/min | Microfluidic applications | |
| Evaporation | Si | Not reported | Not reported | DI water | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | 11 pL/s | Biological sampling | |
| Evaporation | Pdms, PMMA, Stainless steel | 25 × 15 × 3 mm | Not reported | Water | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | 23.5 kPa | 3.02 μL/min | Microfluidics system | |
| FPW | Si, Platinum, Ceramic | Not reported | Not reported | Water | Not reported | 6 | 2–3 MHz | Not reported | 0.255 μL/min | Fluid delivery system |
Categories of microneedles.
| Structure | Overall Shape | Tip Shape | Material Used | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solid | Cylindrical | Volcano | Single crystal silicon | Drug delivery |
| Hollow | Canonical | Snake fang | Polysilicon | Gene delivery |
| In-plane | Pyramid | Cylindrical | Silicon dioxide | Blood extraction |
| Out-of-plane | Candle | Canonical | Silicon nitride | Fluid sampling |
| Spike | Microhypodermis | PGA | Vaccination | |
| Spear | Tapered | PDMS | Micro-dialysis | |
| Square | PMMA | Cancer therapy | ||
| Pentagonal | Glass | Dentistry | ||
| Hexagonal | GaAs | Skin treatment | ||
| Octagonal | Titanium | Cell surgery | ||
| Rocket | Ti- alloy | Allergies diagnosis | ||
| Star | Tungsten | Animal identification | ||
| Tungsten-alloy | Ink-jet printing | |||
| Stainless steel | Sensing electrodes | |||
Figure 19(a) In-plane microneedles; (b) Out-of-plane microneedles.
Figure 20(a) Hollow microneedle; (b) Solid microneedle.
Figure 21Shapes of microneedles (a) Cylindrical; (b) Tapered tip; (c) Canonical; (d) Square base; (e) Pentagonal-base canonical tip; (f) Side-open single lumen; (g) Double lumen; (h) Side-open double lumen.
Recent review of silicon microneedles.
| Reference | Material | Structure of microneedles | Shapes of microneedles | Dimensions | Array size/Needles | Analysis type | Testing | Fabrication techniques | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waseem | Silicon | Hollow/Out-of plane | Cylindrical | L = 200 μm | 5 × 5 | Structural/CFD (Static/Transient) | Not reported | ICP etching | Transdermal drug delivery |
| Chen | Silicon | Hollow/Out-of plane | Cylindrical base | L = 100 μm | 30 × 30 | Fluidic analysis | Pig Skin | Deep reactive ion etching (DRIE) | Transdermal drug delivery |
| Zhang | Silicon | Solid/Out-of plane | Star shape | L = 200 μm | 10 × 10 | PLGA nano Particles distribution | Human skin | RIE/Thin film deposition Photolithography | Transdermal drug delivery |
| Waseem | Silicon | Hollow/Out-of plane | Cylindrical base tapered tip | L = 200 μm | 6 × 6 | Structural/Fluidic (Static/Transient) | Not reported | ICP etching | Transdermal drug delivery |
| Zhang | Silicon | Hollow/Out-of plane | Cylindrical/Side opened at tip | L = 200 μm | 10 × 11 | Fluidic analysis | Potato skin/Chicken skin | Bi-mask technique | Drug delivery/fluid sampling |
| Ding | Silicon | Solid/Hollow | Tangentially cut tip | L1 = 300 μm to 900 μm | 4 × 4 | Fluidic analysis/Statistical | Mouse skin | Surface micromachining/Etching | Dermal diphtheria/influenza vaccination |
| Haq | Silicon | Hollow/Out-of- plane | Pyramidal | L1 = 180 μm | 6 × 6 | Fluidic analysis | Human skin | Wet etching | Transcutaneous drug delivery |
| Yu | Silicon | Hollow/Out-of plane | Cylindrical | DP = 200 μm | Not reported | Structural analysis | One-lead ECG recording system | DRIE | ECG measurement |
| Coulman | Silicon | Solid | Pyramidal shape/Pointed/Frustum tip | L = 280 μm, Db = 200 μm | 16 needles | Diffusion of nano particles | Human epidermal membrane | Wet etching | Transdermal/Intradermal drug delivery |
| Chen | Silicon | Out-of plane | Macro porous tip | Not reported | Not reported | Fluidic analysis | Pig skin | DRIE | Transdermal drug delivery |
| Roxhed | Silicon | Out-of- plane/Hollow | Cross/Circler | L1 = 310 μm, L2 = 400 μm | 25 needles | Fluidic analysis | Human skin | DRIE | Transdermal drug delivery |
| Bhandari | Silicon | Hollow/Out- of-plane | Square base canonical | Not reported | 10 × 10 | Not reported | Not reported | Laser micromachining/Dicing/Etching | Blood sampling |
| Donnelly | Silicon | Not reported | Sharp 3D Tip/Grooves- embedded shaft | L = 270 μm, Db = 240 μm | Not reported | Fluidic analysis/Statistical | Mouse skin/Porcine skin of piglets | Wet etching | Photodynamic therapy |
| Lee | Silicon | Solid/Out- of plane | Conical/Pyramidal | L1 = 800 μm, Db = 200 μm, Dt = 20 μm, L2 = 600 μm, Wb = 300 μm | 3 × 3 | Structural analysis | Not reported | Micromolding | Drug delivery |
Notations: L = Length of needle, Wb = Base width, Do = Outer diameter, Di = Inner diameter, Db = Base diameter, Dt = Tip diameter, DP = Depth.
Recent review of polymeric microneedles.
| Reference | Materials | Structure of microneedles | Shapes of microneedles | Dimensions | Array size/Needles | Analysis type | Testing | Fabrication techniques | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Park | PLA | Solid/Out-of- plane | Canonical/Square base | L = 600 μm | 10 × 10 | Diffusion of trypan blue | Human/Porcine cadaver skin | UV lithography | Transdermal drug delivery |
| Gomaa | PMVE/MA | Solid/Out-of- plane | Canonical | L1 = 400 μm | 11 × 11 | Effect of Skin Permeability with microneedle density | Human skin | Laser micromachining | Drug delivery |
| Donnelly | Polymeric (Gantrez) | Solid/Out-of- plane | Canonical | Not reported | Not reported | Statistical | Porcine skin | Molding process | Intradermal delivery |
| Bodhale | PGA | Hollow/Out-of plane | Side opened/Sharp tip | L = 200 μm | 25 × 25 | Structural/Fluidic | Not reported | Hot embossing/UV excimer laser(Proposed) | Drug delivery |
| Matteucci | PMMA | Hollow/Out-of plane | Rounded tip/Sharp tip | L = 500 to 1100 μm | 10 arrays | Not reported | Not reported | DXRL | Not reported |
| Han | PLLA | Solid/Out-of plane | Sharp 3D Tip/Grooves-embedded shaft | L = 880 ± 20 μm, Wb = 710 ± 15 μm | Not reported | Protein transportation analysis | Mouse skin/Serum | Lithography/Ni electroplating/PDMS replication/Hot embossing | Intradermal immunization |
| Jin | PMMA/PC | Solid/In-plane | Quadrangular/Pyramidal | L = 200–1500 mm | Not reported | Drug transportation | Mouse skin and serum | DXRL/Hot embossing | Transdermal drug delivery |
| Oh | PC | Solid/Out-of plane | Sharp tip/Spear | L = 200–500 μm | Not reported | Hydrophilic molecules transportation | Mouse skin | Molding/Hot embossing | To improve skin permeability for hydrophilic molecules |
| Emam | SU-8 | Out-of-plane/Hollow | Sharp tip | L = 500 μm, Wb = 100 μm | Not reported | Fluid analysis | Not reported | Deposition/Lithography/Etching | Treatment of hydrocephalus |
| Aoyagi | PLA | Solid/Out-of plane | Straight/Harpoon shape/Sharp tip | L = 400 μm | Not reported | Structural | Artificial skin of silicone rubber | Etching/Injection molding | Drug delivery |
| Hsu | SU-8 2050 | Out-of-plane | V-groove | L1 = 236 μm | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Molding/KOH etching | Biomedicine technology |
Notations: L = Length of needle, T = Thickness, Wb = Base width, Do = Outer diameter, Di = Inner diameter, Db = Base diameter.
Recent review of SiO2, glass, stainless-steel, and metallic microneedles.
| Reference | Materials | Structure of Microneedles | Shapes of microneedles | Dimensions | Array size/Needles | Analysis Type | Testing | Fabrication Techniques | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim | Stainless steel | Solid/In-plane | Spear/Sharp tip | L = 700 μm | 5 microneedles | Drug transportation/Statistical analysis | Mouse skin | Infrared Laser | Vaccine delivery |
| Kato | SiO2 | Hollow/Out- of-Plane | Circular Tip | L = 77 μm | Not reported | Structural (Panitration) | Gelatin | DRIE/Micromachining | Cellular function analysis |
| Ding | Stainless steel | Solid/Hollow/Out-of-Plane | Tangentially cut tip | L = 245, 300–900 μm | 4 × 4 | Drug transportation/Statistical | Mouse skin | Surface micromachining/Etching | Dermal diphtheria/Influenza vaccination |
| Jiang | Glass | Hollow | Elliptical tip opening | L = 3–4 cm | Not reported | Histological/Microscopic image analysis | Human cadaver eyes | Micropipette pulling technique | Intrascleral delivery |
| Jin | Ni | Solid/In-plane | Triangular/Pyramidal | L= 200–1500 mm | Not reported | Drug transportation | Mouse skin and serum | DXRL/Hot embossing | Transdermal drug delivery |
| Hou | Ti-alloy | Hollow/Out- of-Plane | Not reported | L = 120 μm | 10 × 10 | Fluidic analysis | Not reported | Not reported | Transdermal drug delivery |
| Kolli and Banga 2008 [ | Maltose | Solid/In-plane | Tetrahedron/Sharp tip | L = 500 μm | 27 needle per array | Drug transportation | Mouse skin/Jacketed Franz diffusion cells | Micro-molding | Transdermal drug delivery |
| Verbaan | Metal | Solid/Hollow | Triangular tip/Tapered shaft | L = 245, 300 μm | 4 × 4 | Waters HPLC System | Human skin | Surface micromachining/Etching | Transdermal drug delivery |
| Parker | Ti | Hollow/In- plane | Spare/Sharp tip | L = 500, 750, 1000 μm | 10 needles | Fluidic/Structural analysis | Pressure Testing apparatus | Bulk micromachining/Multilayer lamination | Drug delivery |
| Shibata | SiO2 | Hollow/Out-of- plane | Circler tip/Cylindrical | L = 77 μm, Do = 5.5 μm | Not reported | Structural analysis | Gelatin | Photolithography/DRIE | Cell surgery |
| Kim and Lee 2007 [ | Metallic | Hollow/Out-of- plane | Tapered tip | L1 = 200 μm | 10 × 10 | Fluidic analysis | Not reported | SU-8 based UV LIGA | Drug delivery/Body fluid sampling |
| Tsuchiya | Ti | Hollow/Out-of- plane | Cylindrical | L = 1 mm | Not reported | Fluidic analysis | Not reported | Sputter deposition | Blood extraction |
Notations: L = Length of needle, T = Thickness, Wb = Base width, Do = Outer diameter, Di = Inner diameter, Db = Base diameter, Dt = Tip diameter.
Figure 22Comparison of voltage versus flow rate for mechanical micropumps.
Figure 23Comparison of voltage versus flow rate for non-mechanical micropumps.
Figure 24Comparison of force versus stress on microneedles.