Mohammad Y Zaidi1, Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar1, Mary Dillhoff2, Eliza Beal2, George Poultsides3, Eleftherios Makris3, Flavio Rocha4, Angelena Crown4, Kamran Idrees5, Paula Marincola Smith5, Hari Nathan6, Megan Beems6, Daniel Abbott7, James R Barrett7, Ryan C Fields8, Jesse Davidson8, Kenneth Cardona1, Shishir K Maithel1. 1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus. 3. Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California. 4. Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington. 5. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 6. Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 7. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison. 8. Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Abstract
Importance: Little information is available regarding the minimum number of lymph nodes needed to accurately stage patients when performing a mesenteric lymphadenectomy for small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors. Objectives: To determine the prognostic role of lymph node positivity and the ideal number of lymph nodes for accurately staging patients with small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series from the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group, a collaboration among 8 US-based, academic tertiary care referral centers, obtained demographic, perioperative, and pathologic data from the group's database, Social Security Death Index, and publicly available obituaries. All patients in these institutions with small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors who underwent curative-intent surgical resection of a primary tumor between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015, were included (n = 199). Patients with duodenal or ampullary tumors, other nonneuroendocrine concurrent malignant neoplasms, mortality of fewer than 30 days after the surgical procedure, and distant metastatic disease were excluded. Data analysis was conducted from September 1, 2017, to December 1, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary study outcome was recurrence-free survival. Hypothesis was generated after data collection and data entry into the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group database. Results: Of the 199 patients included, 112 (56.3%) were male and 87 (43.7%) female with a mean (SD) age of 60.3 (12.5) years and a mean (SD) body mass index of 29.5 (6.0). One hundred fifty-four patients (77.4%) had lymph node-positive disease. No difference in 3-year recurrence-free survival was found between patients with lymph node-positive and lymph node-negative disease. Patients with 4 positive lymph nodes had a worse 3-year recurrence-free survival compared with those with 1 to 3 or 0 positive lymph nodes (81.6% vs 91.4% vs 92.1%; P = .01). When examining patients with fewer than 8 resected lymph nodes, no difference in 3-year recurrence-free survival was observed among patients with 4 or more, 1 to 3, or 0 positive lymph nodes (100% vs 93.8% vs 91.7%; P = .87). Retrieval of 8 or more lymph nodes, however, accurately discriminated patients with 4 or more, 1 to 3, or 0 positive lymph nodes (3-year recurrence-free survival: 79.9% vs 89.6% vs 92.9%; P = .05). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings from this study suggest that, for patients undergoing curative-intent resection of small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors, accurate lymph node staging requires a minimum of 8 lymph nodes for examination, and 4 or more positive lymph nodes are associated with decreased 3-year recurrence-free survival compared with 1 to 3 or 0 positive lymph nodes; a thorough regional lymphadenectomy may be critical for accurate staging and management of this disease.
Importance: Little information is available regarding the minimum number of lymph nodes needed to accurately stage patients when performing a mesenteric lymphadenectomy for small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors. Objectives: To determine the prognostic role of lymph node positivity and the ideal number of lymph nodes for accurately staging patients with small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series from the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group, a collaboration among 8 US-based, academic tertiary care referral centers, obtained demographic, perioperative, and pathologic data from the group's database, Social Security Death Index, and publicly available obituaries. All patients in these institutions with small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors who underwent curative-intent surgical resection of a primary tumor between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015, were included (n = 199). Patients with duodenal or ampullary tumors, other nonneuroendocrine concurrent malignant neoplasms, mortality of fewer than 30 days after the surgical procedure, and distant metastatic disease were excluded. Data analysis was conducted from September 1, 2017, to December 1, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary study outcome was recurrence-free survival. Hypothesis was generated after data collection and data entry into the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group database. Results: Of the 199 patients included, 112 (56.3%) were male and 87 (43.7%) female with a mean (SD) age of 60.3 (12.5) years and a mean (SD) body mass index of 29.5 (6.0). One hundred fifty-four patients (77.4%) had lymph node-positive disease. No difference in 3-year recurrence-free survival was found between patients with lymph node-positive and lymph node-negative disease. Patients with 4 positive lymph nodes had a worse 3-year recurrence-free survival compared with those with 1 to 3 or 0 positive lymph nodes (81.6% vs 91.4% vs 92.1%; P = .01). When examining patients with fewer than 8 resected lymph nodes, no difference in 3-year recurrence-free survival was observed among patients with 4 or more, 1 to 3, or 0 positive lymph nodes (100% vs 93.8% vs 91.7%; P = .87). Retrieval of 8 or more lymph nodes, however, accurately discriminated patients with 4 or more, 1 to 3, or 0 positive lymph nodes (3-year recurrence-free survival: 79.9% vs 89.6% vs 92.9%; P = .05). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings from this study suggest that, for patients undergoing curative-intent resection of small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors, accurate lymph node staging requires a minimum of 8 lymph nodes for examination, and 4 or more positive lymph nodes are associated with decreased 3-year recurrence-free survival compared with 1 to 3 or 0 positive lymph nodes; a thorough regional lymphadenectomy may be critical for accurate staging and management of this disease.
Authors: Stanley P L Leong; Markus Zuber; Robert L Ferris; Yuko Kitagawa; Ramon Cabanas; Charles Levenback; Mark Faries; Sukamal Saha Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2011-05-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Adam C Berger; Elin R Sigurdson; Thomas LeVoyer; Alexandra Hanlon; Robert J Mayer; John S Macdonald; Paul J Catalano; Daniel G Haller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Armando E Giuliano; Kelly K Hunt; Karla V Ballman; Peter D Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Linda M McCall; Monica Morrow Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Oliver Strobel; Ulf Hinz; Alexander Gluth; Thomas Hank; Thilo Hackert; Frank Bergmann; Jens Werner; Markus W Büchler Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Alberto Marchet; Simone Mocellin; Alessandro Ambrosi; Paolo Morgagni; Domenico Garcea; Daniele Marrelli; Franco Roviello; Giovanni de Manzoni; Annamaria Minicozzi; Giovanni Natalini; Francesco De Santis; Luca Baiocchi; Arianna Coniglio; Donato Nitti Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: G de Manzoni; G Verlato; F Roviello; P Morgagni; A Di Leo; L Saragoni; D Marrelli; H Kurihara; F Pasini Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2002-07-15 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Kota Sahara; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Rittal Mehta; Amika Moro; Anghela Z Paredes; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; Flavio Rocha; Zaheer Kanji; Sharon Weber; Alexander Fisher; Ryan Fields; Bradley A Krasnick; Kamran Idrees; Paula M Smith; George A Poultsides; Eleftherios Makris; Cliff Cho; Megan Beems; Mary Dillhoff; Shishir K Maithel; Itaru Endo; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2019-12-14 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Danielle K DePalo; Rachel M Lee; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; Adriana C Gamboa; Flavio Rocha; George Poultsides; Mary Dillhoff; Ryan C Fields; Kamran Idrees; Hari Nathan; Daniel Abbott; Shishir K Maithel; Maria C Russell Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Praveen D Chatani; John G Aversa; James D McDonald; Tahsin M Khan; Xavier M Keutgen; Naris Nilubol Journal: Surgery Date: 2021-04-02 Impact factor: 4.348
Authors: Angela Lamarca; Hamish Clouston; Jorge Barriuso; Mairéad G McNamara; Melissa Frizziero; Was Mansoor; Richard A Hubner; Prakash Manoharan; Sarah O'Dwyer; Juan W Valle Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2019-10-05 Impact factor: 4.241