PURPOSE: To investigate whether the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) is a better prognostic factor as compared with traditional staging systems in patients with gastric cancer regardless of the extension of lymph node dissection. PATIENTS & METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 1853 patients who underwent radical resection for gastric carcinoma at 6 Italian centers. Patients with >15 (group 1, n = 1421) and those with <or=15 (group 2, n = 432) lymph nodes examined were separately analyzed. N ratio categories (N ratio 0, 0%; N ratio 1, 1%-9%; N ratio 2, 10%-25%; N ratio 3, >25%) were determined by the best cut-off approach. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 45.5 months (range, 4-182 months), the 5-year overall survival of N0, N1, and N2 patients of group 1 versus group 2 was 83.4% versus 74.2% (P = 0.0026), 54.3% versus 44.3% (P = 0.018), and 32.7% versus 14.7% (P = 0.004), respectively, suggesting that a low number of excised lymph nodes can lead to the understaging of patients. N ratio identified subsets of patients with significantly different survival rates within N1 and N2 stages in both groups. At multivariate analysis, the N ratio (but not N stage) was retained as an independent prognostic factor both in group 1 and group 2 (HR for N ratio 1, N ratio 2, and N ratio 3 = 1.67, 2.96, and 6.59, and 1.56, 2.68, and 4.28, respectively). In our series, the implementation of N ratio led to the identification of subgroups of patients prognostically more homogeneous than those classified by the TNM system. CONCLUSION: N ratio is a simple and reproducible prognostic tool that can stratify patients with gastric cancer also in case of limited lymph node dissection. These data may represent the rational for improving the prognostic power of current UICC TNM staging system and ultimately the selection of patients who may most benefit from adjuvant treatments.
PURPOSE: To investigate whether the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) is a better prognostic factor as compared with traditional staging systems in patients with gastric cancer regardless of the extension of lymph node dissection. PATIENTS & METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 1853 patients who underwent radical resection for gastric carcinoma at 6 Italian centers. Patients with >15 (group 1, n = 1421) and those with <or=15 (group 2, n = 432) lymph nodes examined were separately analyzed. N ratio categories (N ratio 0, 0%; N ratio 1, 1%-9%; N ratio 2, 10%-25%; N ratio 3, >25%) were determined by the best cut-off approach. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 45.5 months (range, 4-182 months), the 5-year overall survival of N0, N1, and N2 patients of group 1 versus group 2 was 83.4% versus 74.2% (P = 0.0026), 54.3% versus 44.3% (P = 0.018), and 32.7% versus 14.7% (P = 0.004), respectively, suggesting that a low number of excised lymph nodes can lead to the understaging of patients. N ratio identified subsets of patients with significantly different survival rates within N1 and N2 stages in both groups. At multivariate analysis, the N ratio (but not N stage) was retained as an independent prognostic factor both in group 1 and group 2 (HR for N ratio 1, N ratio 2, and N ratio 3 = 1.67, 2.96, and 6.59, and 1.56, 2.68, and 4.28, respectively). In our series, the implementation of N ratio led to the identification of subgroups of patients prognostically more homogeneous than those classified by the TNM system. CONCLUSION:N ratio is a simple and reproducible prognostic tool that can stratify patients with gastric cancer also in case of limited lymph node dissection. These data may represent the rational for improving the prognostic power of current UICC TNM staging system and ultimately the selection of patients who may most benefit from adjuvant treatments.
Authors: Y Kodera; Y Yamamura; Y Shimizu; A Torii; T Hirai; K Yasui; T Morimoto; T Kato; T Kito Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: J J Bonenkamp; J Hermans; M Sasako; C J van de Velde; K Welvaart; I Songun; S Meyer; J T Plukker; P Van Elk; H Obertop; D J Gouma; J J van Lanschot; C W Taat; P W de Graaf; M F von Meyenfeldt; H Tilanus Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-03-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Adam C Berger; Elin R Sigurdson; Thomas LeVoyer; Alexandra Hanlon; Robert J Mayer; John S Macdonald; Paul J Catalano; Daniel G Haller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Bryan J Dicken; David L Bigam; Carol Cass; John R Mackey; Anil A Joy; Stewart M Hamilton Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Vincent Vinh-Hung; Claire Verschraegen; Donald I Promish; Gábor Cserni; Jan Van de Steene; Patricia Tai; Georges Vlastos; Mia Voordeckers; Guy Storme; Melanie Royce Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2004-10-06 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: A Cuschieri; S Weeden; J Fielding; J Bancewicz; J Craven; V Joypaul; M Sydes; P Fayers Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Marco Catarci; Leonardo Antonio Montemurro; Antonio Di Cintio; Sabrina Ghinassi; Luigi Coppola; Luigi Pinnarelli; Augusto Belardi; Maurizio Koch; Giovanni Battista Grassi Journal: Updates Surg Date: 2010-10
Authors: Laura Y Wang; Frank L Palmer; Iain J Nixon; R Michael Tuttle; Jatin P Shah; Snehal G Patel; Ashok R Shaha; Ian Ganly Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Giovanni De Manzoni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Massimo Framarini; Maurizio De Giuli; Domenico D'Ugo; Alberto Marchet; Donato Nitti; Daniele Marrelli; Paolo Morgagni; Andrea Rinnovati; Riccardo Rosati; Franco Roviello; Rosaldo Allieta; Stefano Berti; Umberto Bracale; Patrizio Capelli; Angelo Cavicchi; Natale Di Martino; Annibale Donini; Angelo Filippini; Gianfranco Francioni; Marco Frascio; Alfredo Garofalo; Stefano Maria Giulini; Giovanni Battista Grassi; Paolo Innocenti; Antonio Martino; Gualtiero Mazzocconi; Lorenzo Mazzola; Severino Montemurro; Nicola Palasciano; Gianni Pantuso; Heinrich Pernthaler; Roberto Petri; Diego Piazza; Rosario Sacco; Giovanni Sgroi; Carlo Staudacher; Michele Testa; Carlo Vallicelli; Nereo Vettoretto; Costantino Zingaretti; Lorenzo Capussotti; Mario Morino; Giorgio Maria Verdecchia Journal: Updates Surg Date: 2014-03