Literature DB >> 16192595

Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database.

David D Smith1, Rebecca R Schwarz, Roderich E Schwarz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prognosis of potentially curable (M0), completely resected gastric cancer is primarily determined by pathologic T and N staging criteria. The optimal regional dissection extent during gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma continues to be debated.
METHODS: A gastric cancer data set was created through structured queries to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1973 to 1999). Relationships between the number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined and survival were analyzed for the stage subgroups T1/2N0, T1/2N1, T3N0, and T3N1.
RESULTS: In every stage subgroup, overall survival was highly dependent on the number of LNs examined. Multivariate prognostic variables in the T1/2N0M0 subgroup were number of LNs examined, age (for both, P < .0001), race (P = .0004), sex (P = .0006), and tumor size (P = .02). A linear trend for superior survival based on more LNs examined could be confirmed for all four stage subgroups. Baseline model-predicted 5-year survival with only one LN examined was 56% (T1/2N0), 35% (T1/2N1), 29% (T3N0), or 13% (T3N1). For every 10 extra LNs dissected, survival improved by 7.6% (T1/2N0), 5.7% (T1/2N1), 11% (T3N0), or 7% (T3N1). A cut-point analysis yielded the greatest survival difference at 10 LNs examined but continued to detect significantly superior survival differences for cut points at up to 40 LNs, always in favor of more LNs examined.
CONCLUSION: Although the impact of stage migration versus improved regional disease control cannot be separated on basis of the available information, the data provide support in favor of extended lymphadenectomy during potentially curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16192595     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.14.621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  178 in total

1.  Lymphovascular and perineural invasion as selection criteria for adjuvant therapy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institution analysis.

Authors:  Sarah B Fisher; Sameer H Patel; David A Kooby; Sharon Weber; Mark Bloomston; Clifford Cho; Ioannis Hatzaras; Carl Schmidt; Emily Winslow; Charles A Staley; Shishir K Maithel
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Impact of lymph node micrometastasis on gastric carcinoma prognosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong-Ji Zeng; Chun-Dong Zhang; Dong-Qiu Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The impact of a high body mass index on laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hyuk-Joon Lee; Hyung-Ho Kim; Min-Chan Kim; Seong-Yeob Ryu; Wook Kim; Kyo-Young Song; Gyu-Seok Cho; Sang-Uk Han; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung-Wan Ryu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Effect of lymphadenectomy extent on advanced gastric cancer located in the cardia and fundus.

Authors:  Chang-Ming Huang; Bi-Juan Lin; Hui-Shan Lu; Xiang-Fu Zhang; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Adjuvant radiation therapy and lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer: a SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Ravi Shridhar; Jill Weber; Sarah E Hoffe; Khaldoun Almhanna; Richard Karl; Kenneth Meredith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Roderich E Schwarz; David D Smith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  The survival difference between gastric cancer patients from the UK and Japan remains after weighted propensity score analysis considering all background factors.

Authors:  Takanobu Yamada; Takaki Yoshikawa; Masataka Taguri; Tsutomu Hayashi; Toru Aoyama; Henry M Sue-Ling; Kiran Bonam; Jeremy D Hayden; Heike I Grabsch
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Determining the Adequate Examined Lymph Node Count in Resected Ampullary Adenocarcinoma-A National Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ibrahim Nassour; Alana Christie; Michael A Choti; John C Mansour; Rebecca M Minter; Patricio M Polanco; Mathew M Augustine; Matthew R Porembka; Xian-Jin Xie; Sam C Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Number of retrieved lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor after total gastrectomy for patients with stage III gastric cancer: propensity score matching analysis of a multi-institution dataset.

Authors:  Shogo Hayashi; Mitsuro Kanda; Seiji Ito; Yoshinari Mochizuki; Hitoshi Teramoto; Kiyoshi Ishigure; Toshifumi Murai; Takahiro Asada; Akiharu Ishiyama; Hidenobu Matsushita; Chie Tanaka; Daisuke Kobayashi; Michitaka Fujiwara; Kenta Murotani; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Risk factors of survival and surgical treatment for advanced gastric cancer with large tumor size.

Authors:  Chen Li; Sung Jin Oh; Sungsoo Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Min Yan; Zheng Gang Zhu; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.