| Literature DB >> 30380779 |
Kamila Tomoko Yuyama1,2, Lucile Wendt3, Frank Surup4, Robin Kretz5, Clara Chepkirui6, Kathrin Wittstein7, Chollaratt Boonlarppradab8, Sarunyou Wongkanoun9, Jennifer Luangsa-Ard10, Marc Stadler11, Wolf-Rainer Abraham12.
Abstract
During the course of our ongoing work to discover new inhibitors of biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus from fungal sources, we observed biofilm inhibition by cytochalasans isolated from cultures of the ascomycete Hypoxylon fragiforme for the first time. Two new compounds were purified by a bioassay-guided fractionation procedure; their structures were elucidated subsequently by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS). This unexpected finding prompted us to test further cytochalasans from other fungi and from commercial sources for comparison. Out of 21 cytochalasans, 13 showed significant inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation at subtoxic levels. These findings indicate the potential of cytochalasans as biofilm inhibitors for the first time, also because the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) are independent of the anti-biofilm activities. However, cytochalasans are known to be inhibitors of actin, making some of them very toxic for eukaryotic cells. Since the chemical structures of the tested compounds were rather diverse, the inclusion of additional derivatives, as well as the evaluation of their selectivity against mammalian cells vs. the bacterium, will be necessary as next step in order to develop structure-activity relationships and identify the optimal candidates for development of an anti-biofilm agent.Entities:
Keywords: Xylariales; ascomycota; bacterial pathogens; biofilm dispersion; chromatography; natural products; secondary metabolites; structure elucidation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30380779 PMCID: PMC6316226 DOI: 10.3390/biom8040129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data of new metabolites 18–20 in CHCl3-d.
| 19 a | 20 b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC, Mult. | δH, Mult. | δC, Mult. | δH, Mult. | |
| 1 | 173.6, C | 174.3, C | ||
| 2 | 5.49, br s | 5.42, br s | ||
| 3 | 53.3, CH | 3.25, m | 55.0, CH | 3.20, m |
| 4 | 44.8, CH | 3.30, dd (5.7, 2.4) | 48.4, CH | 3.20, m |
| 5 | 31.7, CH | 2.79, m | 34.8, CH | 2.43, m |
| 6 | 148.6, C | 140.2, C | ||
| 7 | 71.6, CH | 4.10, d (10.1) | 125.7, CH | 5.48, m |
| 8 | 51.8, CH | 2.44, m | 49.7, CH | 2.58, d (9.6) |
| 9 | 63.4, C | 68.4, C | ||
| 10 | 43.3, CH2 | 2.63, dd (13.4, 5.2) | 44.2, CH2 | 2.73, dd (13.7, 4.4) |
| 11 | 13.2, CH3 | 1.02, m | 13.5, CH3 | 1.18, br d (7.3) |
| 12 | 114.1, CH2 | 5.28, br s | 20.0, CH3 | 1.75, q (1.3) |
| 13 | 126.9, CH | 5.85, dd (15.6, 9.8) | 128.1, CH | 5.85, ddd (15.5, 9.6, 1.3) |
| 14 | 138.7, CH | 5.22, ddd (15.6, 10.9, 4.8) | 135.9, CH | 5.22, ddd (15.5, 10.9, 4.8) |
| 15 | 42.9, CH2 | 2.02, m | 42.7, CH2 | 2.01, m |
| 16 | 28.7, CH | 1.45, m | 28.7, CH | 1.48, m |
| 17 | 46.7, CH2 | 1.94, m | 46.4, CH2 | 1.95, m |
| 18 | 34.3, CH | 2.63, m | 34.4, CH | 2.63, m |
| 19 | 154.75, CH | 6.52, dd (15.9, 6.9) | 153.2, CH | 6.46, dd (15.9, 6.9) |
| 20 | 132.1, CH | 7.05, br d (15.9) | 132.9, CH | 7.12, dd (15.9, 1.4) |
| 21 | 196.6 | 198.1, C | ||
| 22 | 26.2, CH3 | 1.04, m | 26.1, CH3 | 1.02, d (6.9) |
| 23 | 17.6, CH3 | 1.14, d (7.0) | 17.6, CH3 | 1.13, d (6.9) |
| 1′ | 129.2, C | 129.5, C | ||
| 2′/6′ | 130.3, CH | 6.99, br d (8.4) | 130.3, CH | 6.99, br d (8.4) |
| 3′/5′ | 115.6, CH | 6.77, br d (8.4) | 115.6, CH | 6.77, br d (8.4) |
| 4′ | 154.69, C | OH: 5.41, s | 154.6, C | OH: 5.09, s |
a 500 Mhz for 1H, 125 MHz for 13C, b 700 Mhz for 1H, 175 MHz for 13C.
Figure 1Chemical structures of the cytochalasins that were tested and isolated in the present study. For details of individual molecules see Table 1.
Origin and anti-biofilm activities of the tested cytochalasans. BCC: BIOTEC culture collection, BBH: BIOTEC Bangkok Herbarium.
| Compound | Source, Producing Fungus/Strain | MIC (μg mL−1) | Inhibition of Biofilm Formation (%) | Potency of Biofilm Inhibition 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cytochalasin A ( | 32S | 91 ± 1.4 (16 μg mL−1) | +++ | |
| Cytochalasin B ( | >256 | - | - | |
| Cytochalasin C ( | >256 | 42 ± 6.2 (256 μg mL−1) | ++ | |
| Cytochalasin D ( | >256 | - | - | |
| Cytochalasin E ( | >256 | - | ||
| Cytochalasin H ( | >256 | - | - | |
| L-696,474 ( | >256 | 44 ± 0.02 (64 μg mL−1) | ++ | |
| 21- | >256 | 33 ± 9.1 (256 μg mL−1) | + | |
| Saccalasin A ( | >256 | 36 ± 8.8 (256 μg mL−1) | + | |
| >256 | 85 ± 5.4 (256 μg mL−1) | +++ | ||
| >256 | - | - | ||
| >256 | 76 ± 10.8 (256 μg mL−1) | +++ | ||
| >256 | 73.7 ± 16.8 (256 μg mL−1) | +++ | ||
| >256 | 32 ± 0.7 (256 μg mL−1) | + | ||
| 19,20-Epoxycytochalasin C ( | >256 | 40 ± 6.0 (256 μg mL−1) | ++ | |
| >256 | - | - | ||
| Phenochalasin C ( | >256 | 31 ± 6.4 (256 μg mL−1) | + | |
| Phenochalasin D ( | >256 | 43 ± 4.0 (256 μg mL−1)46 ± 1.5 (64 μg mL−1) | ++ | |
| Chaetoglobosin A ( | 256 | 87.3 ± 4.4 (128 μg mL−1) | +++ |
1 +++ 70–91%, ++ 40–70%, + 20–40% biofilm inhibition.