| Literature DB >> 31417521 |
Manpreet Kaur1,2,3,4, Manoj Jangra1, Harjodh Singh2,3,4, Rushikesh Tambat1, Nittu Singh5, Sanjay M Jachak6, Sunita Mishra3,4, Charu Sharma5, Hemraj Nandanwar1,4, Anil Kumar Pinnaka2,4.
Abstract
Natural evolution in microbes exposed to antibiotics causes inevitable selection of resistant mutants. This turns out to be a vicious cycle which requires the continuous discovery of new and effective antibiotics. For the last six decades, we have been relying on semisynthetic derivatives of natural products discovered in "Golden Era" from microbes, especially Streptomyces sp. Low success rates of rational drug-design sparked a resurgence in the invention of novel natural products or scaffolds from untapped or uncommon microbial niches. Therefore, in this study, we examined the microbial diversity inhabiting the yak milk for their ability to produce antimicrobial compounds. We prepared the crude fermentation extracts of fifty isolates from yak milk and screened them against indicator strains for the inhibitory activity. Later, with the aid of gel filtration chromatography followed by reversed-phase HPLC, we isolated one antimicrobial compound Y5-P1 from the strain Y5 (Pseudomonas koreensis) which showed bioactivity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The compound was chemically characterized using HRMS, FTIR, and NMR spectroscopy and identified as 1-acetyl-9H-β-carboline-3-carboxylic acid. It showed minimum inhibitory activity (MIC) in the range of 62.5-250 μg /ml. The cytotoxicity results revealed that IC50 against two mammalian cell lines i.e., HepG2 and HEK293T was 500 and 750 μg/ml, respectively. This is the first report on the production of this derivative of β-carboline by the microorganism. Also, the study enlightens the importance of microbes residing in uncommon environments or unexplored habitats in the discovery of a diverse array of natural products which could be designed further as drug candidates against highly resistant pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotic- resistance; antimicrobial compound; natural product; yak milk; β-Carboline
Year: 2019 PMID: 31417521 PMCID: PMC6681700 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01728
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
List of microbial isolates showing antimicrobial activity.
| 1 | Y-2 | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2 | Y-5 | + | + | + | – | + | + | + | + | + |
| 3 | Y-14 | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | – | + |
| 4 | Y-21 | + | – | + | – | – | – | + | – | + |
| 5 | Y-23 | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 6 | Y-25 | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 7 | Y-27 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + |
| 8 | Y-28 | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | + |
| 9 | Y-30 | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | + |
| 10 | Y-31 | + | – | + | – | – | + | + | – | – |
| 11 | Y-33 | + | – | + | – | – | – | + | – | – |
| 12 | Y-36 | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | + | – |
| 13 | Y-37 | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 14 | Y-38 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 15 | Y-45 | – | – | + | – | – | – | + | – | – |
| 16 | Y-48 | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | + |
| 17 | Y-53 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 18 | Y-51 | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | – | + |
| 19 | Y-1 | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | + | – |
| 20 | Y-b | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | + | + |
| 21 | LAN−4 | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | + | + |
| 22 | Ya | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – |
| 23 | Milk−2 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – |
| 24 | An5 | – | + | + | + | – | + | + | – | – |
| 25 | Y-47 | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | – | – |
| 26 | Y-44 | + | + | + | – | – | + | – | – | – |
| 27 | Yibs | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | – | – |
| 28 | An4 | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | – | – |
| 29 | L4 | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | – | – |
| 30 | Y-50 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – |
| 31 | Y-52 | + | – | + | – | – | + | – | – | – |
| 32 | Yes | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – |
.
Figure 1Pie chart representation of the percentage of the positive yak milk isolates in antimicrobial screening.
Figure 2Growth curve of the strain Y-5 and its antimicrobial activity against Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633. The antimicrobial activity started around 24 h of incubation.
Figure 3Structure of Y5-P1 (1-acetyl-9H-β-carboline-3-carboxylic acid).
Minimum inhibitory concentration of Y5-P1 against pathogenic strains.
| ATCC 6051 | 125 | |
| ATCC 25923 | 250 | |
| ATCC 25922 | 62.5 | |
| ATCC 700603 | 62.5 | |
| ATCC 27853 | 62.5 | |
| ATCC 19606 | 62.5 | |
| GMCH 04 | 62.5 | |
| GMCH 13 | 62.5 | |
| GMCH 06 | 62.5 | |
| GMCH 05 | 62.5 | |
| 7932 | 62.5 | |
| 9062 | 62.5 |
Figure 4Time-kill kinetics of Y5-P1 showing the bacteriostatic action. The data are represented as mean ± SD of three replicates.
Figure 5Transmission electron microscopy. (A) Control cells (B) Y5-P1 treated cells. Right panel shows the cell shape and morphology at higher magnification. Upon the treatment, the cells displayed a distorted morphology, and intracellular material is aggregated. Also, the bacteria are showing the disrupted cell division.
Figure 6Mammalian Toxicity of Y5-P1 compound in (A) HEK 293 cells; (B) Hep G2 cells (C) The toxicity results are represented in tabular form.
Figure 7Antibiofilm activity of Y5-P1 in MRSA strains. (A) S. aureus ATCC 33591 and (B) S. aureus ATCC 43300. The compound inhibited ~50% of the biofilm at subtoxic concentrations. The experiment was performed in four replicates and presented as Mean ± SD.