Literature DB >> 28389279

In vitro assessment of skin sensitization, photosensitization and phototoxicity potential of commercial glyphosate-containing formulations.

Renato Ivan de Ávila1, Gabriel Campos Teixeira1, Danillo Fabrini Maciel Costa Veloso2, Larissa Cleres Moreira1, Eliana Martins Lima2, Marize Campos Valadares3.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the applicability of a modified Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA) (OECD N° 442C, 2015) through the 10-fold reduction of reaction volume (micro-DPRA, mDPRA) for skin sensitization evaluation of six commercial glyphosate-containing formulations. In addition, another modification of DPRA was proposed by adding a UVA (5J/cm2) irradiation step, namely photo-mDPRA, to better characterize (photo)sensitizer materials. The phototoxicity profile of pesticides was also evaluated using the 3T3 Neutral Red Uptake Phototoxicity Test (3T3-NRU-PT) (OECD N° 432, 2004). The mDPRA could represent an environmentally acceptable test approach, since it reduces costs and organic waste. Peptide depletion was greater in photo-mDPRA and changed the reactivity class of each test material, in comparison to mDPRA. Thus, the association of mDPRA with photo-mDPRA was better for correctly characterizing human (photo)sensitizer substances and pesticides. In general, cysteine depletion was greater than that of lysine for all materials tested in both mDPRA and photo-mDPRA. Furthermore, while 3T3-NRU-PT is unable to predict (photo)sensitizers, it was capable of correctly identifying the phototoxic potential of the tested agrochemical formulations. In conclusion, mDPRA plus photo-mDPRA and 3T3-NRU-PT seem to be preliminary non-animal test batteries for skin (photo)sensitization/phototoxicity assessment of chemicals, agrochemical formulations and their ingredients.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agrochemical mixtures; Glyphosate; Non-animal testing; Phototoxicity; Skin photosensitization; Skin sensitization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28389279     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  2 in total

Review 1.  Skin sensitization testing needs and data uses by US regulatory and research agencies.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; Amber B Daniel; David Allen; Cecilia Aguila; Surender Ahir; Simona Bancos; Evisabel Craig; Dori Germolec; Chandramallika Ghosh; Naomi L Hudson; Abigail Jacobs; David M Lehmann; Joanna Matheson; Emily N Reinke; Nakissa Sadrieh; Stanislav Vukmanovic; Nicole Kleinstreuer
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Exploration of alternative test methods to evaluate phototoxicity of ophthalmic agents by using Statens Seruminstitut Rabbit Cornea cell lines and 3D human reconstituted cornea models.

Authors:  Soyoung Kim; Ki Hwan Choi; Jaesuk Yun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.