| Literature DB >> 30373827 |
Kanupriya Pande1,2, Jeffrey J Donatelli1,3, Erik Malmerberg1,2,4, Lutz Foucar5, Christoph Bostedt6, Ilme Schlichting5, Petrus H Zwart7,2.
Abstract
Fluctuation X-ray scattering (FXS) is an emerging experimental technique in which X-ray solution scattering data are collected from particles in solution using ultrashort X-ray exposures generated by a free-electron laser (FEL). FXS experiments overcome the low data-to-parameter ratios associated with traditional solution scattering measurements by providing several orders of magnitude more information in the final processed data. Here we demonstrate the practical feasibility of FEL-based FXS on a biological multiple-particle system and describe data-processing techniques required to extract robust FXS data and significantly reduce the required number of snapshots needed by introducing an iterative noise-filtering technique. We showcase a successful ab initio electron density reconstruction from such an experiment, studying the Paramecium bursaria Chlorella virus (PBCV-1).Entities:
Keywords: fluctuation X-ray scattering; free-electron laser; small-angle scattering
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30373827 PMCID: PMC6243272 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1812064115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.(A and B) An FXS experiment is performed by taking femtosecond X-ray diffraction snapshots of particles in solution (A) and computing angular intensity correlations over many images (B). The diffraction patterns consist of data collected on two detector pairs, the so-called back and front detectors, named after their location relative to the sample, capturing both the low and higher angular sections of the data. Artifacts, such as high-intensity streaks originating from the interface between the liquid jet and vacuum of the experimental chamber (depicted as yellow overloaded pixels), are present on both pairs and need to be identified and masked out before computing correlations.
Fig. 2.The correlations computed from the experimental PBCV-1 correlation data are subjected to the filtering procedure as outlined in detail in . As can be seen in A, correlations obtained using 60,000 images (blue dots) or those obtained using 5,000 images (orange dots) result in very comparable correlations after the M-TIF technique (red and black lines). (B and C) The surface for obtained from the filtering procedure is shown B, as are the diagonal terms for l equal to 0, 2, 6, and 20 from correlation data derived from various image counts (C). The gaps in the q range of the data (B and C) are regions deemed unreliable due to limited spatial coverage of the detectors in the diffraction setup.
Fig. 3.(A and B) Using the coefficients obtained from the filtering procedure from the 60,000-image PBCV-1 dataset, multiple independent M-TIP–based structure determinations were performed, and the resulting structures were aligned and subsequently averaged. (A) The resulting density has an approximately icosahedral outer capsid, with an asymmetric distribution of scattering mass inside the capsid. (B) The resolution of the reconstruction is approximately 11.5 nm on the basis of a FSC of two independent data halves (30,000 each) or 17.5 nm on the basis of the PRTF.
Fig. 4.Correlation coefficients between two independent data halves collected on the back (A) and the front detector (B) indicate that there are usable data to approximately 0.056 . Data landing between the front and the back panel have not been recorded and have been masked out during the final reconstructions. The very low resolution data have been excluded from the analyses as well, due to the presence of systematic errors in the data. The correlation of the data halves for () pairs falling on different detectors is show in .