Literature DB >> 23434439

Pulse width dependence of motor threshold and input-output curve characterized with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Angel V Peterchev1, Stefan M Goetz, Gregory G Westin, Bruce Luber, Sarah H Lisanby.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the use of a novel controllable pulse parameter TMS (cTMS) device to characterize human corticospinal tract physiology.
METHODS: Motor threshold and input-output (IO) curve of right first dorsal interosseus were determined in 26 and 12 healthy volunteers, respectively, at pulse widths of 30, 60, and 120 μs using a custom-built cTMS device. Strength-duration curve rheobase and time constant were estimated from the motor thresholds. IO slope was estimated from sigmoid functions fitted to the IO data.
RESULTS: All procedures were well tolerated with no seizures or other serious adverse events. Increasing pulse width decreased the motor threshold and increased the pulse energy and IO slope. The average strength-duration curve time constant is estimated to be 196 μs, 95% CI [181 μs, 210 μs]. IO slope is inversely correlated with motor threshold both across and within pulse width. A simple quantitative model explains these dependencies.
CONCLUSIONS: Our strength-duration time constant estimate compares well to published values and may be more accurate given increased sample size and enhanced methodology. Multiplying the IO slope by the motor threshold may provide a sensitive measure of individual differences in corticospinal tract physiology. SIGNIFICANCE: Pulse parameter control offered by cTMS provides enhanced flexibility that can contribute novel insights in TMS studies.
Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23434439      PMCID: PMC3664250          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  35 in total

1.  Influence of pulse configuration and direction of coil current on excitatory effects of magnetic motor cortex and nerve stimulation.

Authors:  L Niehaus; B U Meyer; T Weyh
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Impact of pulse duration in single pulse TMS.

Authors:  H Rothkegel; M Sommer; W Paulus; N Lang
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Optimal focal transcranial magnetic activation of the human motor cortex: effects of coil orientation, shape of the induced current pulse, and stimulus intensity.

Authors:  J P Brasil-Neto; L G Cohen; M Panizza; J Nilsson; B J Roth; M Hallett
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.177

4.  A transcranial magnetic stimulator inducing near-rectangular pulses with controllable pulse width (cTMS).

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Reza Jalinous; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Logarithmic distribution of amplitudes of compound muscle action potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  J F Nielsen
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.177

6.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulator with controllable pulse parameters.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; David L Murphy; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 7.  Consensus: New methodologies for brain stimulation.

Authors:  Ying-Zu Huang; Martin Sommer; Gary Thickbroom; Masashi Hamada; Alvero Pascual-Leonne; Walter Paulus; Joseph Classen; Angel V Peterchev; Abraham Zangen; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Strength-duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes.

Authors:  F Rattay; L P Paredes; R N Leao
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Dysfunction of axonal membrane conductances in adolescents and young adults with spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Michelle A Farrar; Steve Vucic; Cindy S-Y Lin; Susanna B Park; Heather M Johnston; Desirée du Sart; Hugh Bostock; Matthew C Kiernan
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Analysis and optimization of pulse dynamics for magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Cong Nam Truong; Manuel G Gerhofer; Angel V Peterchev; Hans-Georg Herzog; Thomas Weyh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  30 in total

1.  Simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation in head model with morphologically-realistic cortical neurons.

Authors:  Aman S Aberra; Boshuo Wang; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Pulse width dependence of motor threshold and input-output curve characterized with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Stefan M Goetz; Gregory G Westin; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Neurocognitive Effects of Combined Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) and Venlafaxine in Geriatric Depression: Phase 1 of the PRIDE Study.

Authors:  Sarah H Lisanby; Shawn M McClintock; George Alexopoulos; Samuel H Bailine; Elisabeth Bernhardt; Mimi C Briggs; C Munro Cullum; Zhi-De Deng; Mary Dooley; Emma T Geduldig; Robert M Greenberg; Mustafa M Husain; Styliani Kaliora; Rebecca G Knapp; Vassilios Latoussakis; Lauren S Liebman; William V McCall; Martina Mueller; Georgios Petrides; Joan Prudic; Peter B Rosenquist; Matthew V Rudorfer; Shirlene Sampson; Abeba A Teklehaimanot; Kristen G Tobias; Richard D Weiner; Robert C Young; Charles H Kellner
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 4.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

5.  Double-Containment Coil With Enhanced Winding Mounting for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With Reduced Acoustic Noise.

Authors:  Lari M Koponen; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Enhancement of Neuromodulation with Novel Pulse Shapes Generated by Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; David L K Murphy; I Cassie Kozyrkov; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Noninvasive extraction of microsecond-scale dynamics from human motor cortex.

Authors:  Lari M Koponen; Jaakko O Nieminen; Tuomas P Mutanen; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  Rehabilitating the addicted brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Marco Diana; Tommi Raij; Miriam Melis; Aapo Nummenmaa; Lorenzo Leggio; Antonello Bonci
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Optimal Estimation of Neural Recruitment Curves Using Fisher Information: Application to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Alavi; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Randomized Sham Controlled Double-blind Trial of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Adults With Severe Tourette Syndrome.

Authors:  Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger; Antonio Mantovani; Maria G Motlagh; Pedro Gomes de Alvarenga; Liliya Katsovich; James F Leckman; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.