| Literature DB >> 28772589 |
Daniela Predoi1, Simona Liliana Iconaru2, Aurélien Deniaud3,4,5, Mireille Chevallet6,7,8, Isabelle Michaud-Soret9,10,11, Nicolas Buton12, Alina Mihaela Prodan13,14.
Abstract
The present work was focused on the synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite doped with low concentrations of zinc (Zn:HAp) (0.01 < xZn < 0.05). The incorporation of low concentrations of Zn2+ ions in the hydroxyapatite (HAp) structure was achieved by co-precipitation method. The physico-chemical properties of the samples were characterized by X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), zeta-potential, and DLS and N₂-BET measurements. The results obtained by XRD and FTIR studies demonstrated that doping hydroxyapatite with low concentrations of zinc leads to the formation of a hexagonal structure with lattice parameters characteristic to hydroxyapatite. The XRD studies have also shown that the crystallite size and lattice parameters of the unit cell depend on the substitutions of Ca2+ with Zn2+ in the apatitic structure. Moreover, the FTIR analysis revealed that the water content increases with the increase of zinc concentration. Furthermore, the Energy Dispersive X-ray Analysis (EDAX) and XPS analyses showed that the elements Ca, P, O, and Zn were found in all the Zn:HAp samples suggesting that the synthesized materials were zinc doped hydroxyapatite, Ca10-xZnx(PO₄)₆(OH), with 0.01 ≤ xZn ≤ 0.05. Antimicrobial assays on Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacterial strains and HepG2 cell viability assay were carried out.Entities:
Keywords: Escherichia coli; HepG2 cell viability; Staphylococcus aureus; hydroxyapatite; zinc
Year: 2017 PMID: 28772589 PMCID: PMC5503371 DOI: 10.3390/ma10030229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1The XRD (X-ray diffraction) patterns of HAp and Zn:HAp, Ca10−Zn(PO4)6(OH)2 synthesized samples with 0 ≤ xZn ≤ 0.05.
Calculated lattice constants, the deviation of Zn:HAp and the average crystallite sizes measured parallel and perpendicular to the c axis with different xZn values.
| Sample | Cell Parameters | Crystallite Sizes (Å) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| a = b/Deviation (Å) | c/Deviation (Å) | ||
| ICDD-PDF#9-432 | 9.418 | 6.884 | - |
| 9.4320/0.001 | 6.8838/0.001 | 231.879 ± 1.000 | |
| 9.4325/0.001 | 6.8828/0.001 | 230.797 ± 1.000 | |
| 9.4348/0.001 | 6.8818/0.001 | 224.182 ± 1.000 | |
| 9.4365/0.001 | 6.8808/0.002 | 201.651 ± 1.000 | |
Figure 2Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of Zn:HAp, samples with 0 ≤ xZn ≤ 0.05 from 400 to 1400 cm−1 (A) and from 1600 to 4000 cm−1 (B).
Figure 3XPS general spectrum of Zn:Hap, Ca10−Zn(PO4)6(OH)2 samples synthesized with 0.01 ≤ xZn ≤ 0.05 (A); and narrow scan spectra of Zn element (B).
Figure 4Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (A); and the EDAX analysis (B) of Zn:HAp, samples with 0.01 ≤ xZn ≤ 0.05.
Figure 5Colloidal characteristics of the Zn:Hap, Ca10−Zn(PO4)6(OH)2 samples synthesized with 0.01 ≤ xZn ≤ 0.05: (A) zeta-potential distribution curves; and (B) hydrodynamic size distribution curves images.
Figure 6Textural characteristics of the Zn:HAp, Ca10−Zn(PO4)6(OH)2 samples synthesized with 0.01 ≤ xZn ≤ 0.05 using N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and the pore size distribution curves.
Summary of N2 adsorption/desorption results.
| Sample | BET Nitrogen Adsorption/Desorption | BJH Nitrogen Adsorption/Desorption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBET (m2/g) | Vm (cm3) | C | Pore Size (nm) | Pore Volume (m3/g) | |
| 99.481 | 22.852 | 386.660 | 18.533 | 0.461 | |
| 104.285 | 23.956 | 383.430 | 15.485 | 0.404 | |
| 115.421 | 26.514 | 393.876 | 12.408 | 0.358 | |
Figure 7Cell viability assays: (A) S. aureus cell growth in LB at 30 °C for 12 h in the presence of Zn:HAp with xZn = 0.01, xZn = 0.03 or xZn = 0.05 at concentrations between 1.95 and 1000 µg/mL; (B) E. coli cell growth in LB at 30 °C for 12 h in the presence of Zn:HAp with xZn = 0.01, xZn = 0.03 or xZn = 0.05 at concentrations between 1.95 and 1000 µg/mL; and (C) HepG2 viability after a 24 h incubation with Zn:HAp with xZn = 0.01, xZn = 0.03 or xZn = 0.05 at concentrations between 62.5 and 500 µg/mL. Error bars are calculated from at least 3 independent experiments.
Figure 8Inverted phase contrast microscopy of HepG2 cells cultivated in the presence of Zn:HAp with xZn = 0.01, xZn = 0.03 and xZn = 0.05 at three different concentrations (62.5, 125 and 500 µg/mL) compared to control.