Literature DB >> 30340027

Automatic grading of prostate cancer in digitized histopathology images: Learning from multiple experts.

Guy Nir1, Soheil Hor2, Davood Karimi3, Ladan Fazli4, Brian F Skinnider5, Peyman Tavassoli6, Dmitry Turbin7, Carlos F Villamil8, Gang Wang8, R Storey Wilson9, Kenneth A Iczkowski10, M Scott Lucia9, Peter C Black4, Purang Abolmaesumi3, S Larry Goldenberg4, Septimiu E Salcudean11.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogeneous disease that is manifested in a diverse range of histologic patterns and its grading is therefore associated with an inter-observer variability among pathologists, which may lead to an under- or over-treatment of patients. In this work, we develop a computer aided diagnosis system for automatic grading of PCa in digitized histopathology images using supervised learning methods. Our pipeline comprises extraction of multi-scale features that include glandular, cellular, and image-based features. A number of novel features are proposed based on intra- and inter-nuclei properties; these features are shown to be among the most important ones for classification. We train our classifiers on 333 tissue microarray (TMA) cores that were sampled from 231 radical prostatectomy patients and annotated in detail by six pathologists for different Gleason grades. We also demonstrate the TMA-trained classifier's performance on additional 230 whole-mount slides of 56 patients, independent of the training dataset, by examining the automatic grading on manually marked lesions and randomly sampled 10% of the benign tissue. For the first time, we incorporate a probabilistic approach for supervised learning by multiple experts to account for the inter-observer grading variability. Through cross-validation experiments, the overall grading agreement of the classifier with the pathologists was found to be an unweighted kappa of 0.51, while the overall agreements between each pathologist and the others ranged from 0.45 to 0.62. These results suggest that our classifier's performance is within the inter-observer grading variability levels across the pathologists in our study, which are also consistent with those reported in the literature.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer aided diagnosis; Digital pathology; Machine learning; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30340027     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2018.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  21 in total

1.  Automatic cancer detection on digital histopathology images of mid-gland radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Wenchao Han; Carol Johnson; Andrew Warner; Mena Gaed; Jose A Gomez; Madeleine Moussa; Joseph Chin; Stephen Pautler; Glenn Bauman; Aaron D Ward
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-07-16

2.  An End-to-end System for Automatic Characterization of Iba1 Immunopositive Microglia in Whole Slide Imaging.

Authors:  Alexander D Kyriazis; Shahriar Noroozizadeh; Amir Refaee; Woongcheol Choi; Lap-Tak Chu; Asma Bashir; Wai Hang Cheng; Rachel Zhao; Dhananjay R Namjoshi; Septimiu E Salcudean; Cheryl L Wellington; Guy Nir
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2019-07

3.  Machine Learning Takes Laboratory Automation to the Next Level.

Authors:  Bradley A Ford; Erin McElvania
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Deep learning with noisy labels: Exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysis.

Authors:  Davood Karimi; Haoran Dou; Simon K Warfield; Ali Gholipour
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence at the intersection of pathology and radiology in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephnie A Harmon; Sena Tuncer; Thomas Sanford; Peter L Choyke; Barış Türkbey
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  Using deep learning to detect patients at risk for prostate cancer despite benign biopsies.

Authors:  Bojing Liu; Yinxi Wang; Philippe Weitz; Johan Lindberg; Johan Hartman; Wanzhong Wang; Lars Egevad; Henrik Grönberg; Martin Eklund; Mattias Rantalainen
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-23

7.  Application of Machine Learning Algorithms in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Classification.

Authors:  Clement G Yedjou; Solange S Tchounwou; Richard A Aló; Rashid Elhag; BereKet Mochona; Lekan Latinwo
Journal:  Int J Sci Acad Res       Date:  2021-10-30

8.  Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Histopathologic Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Ohad Kott; Drew Linsley; Ali Amin; Andreas Karagounis; Carleen Jeffers; Dragan Golijanin; Thomas Serre; Boris Gershman
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2019-11-22

9.  Histologic tissue components provide major cues for machine learning-based prostate cancer detection and grading on prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Wenchao Han; Carol Johnson; Mena Gaed; José A Gómez; Madeleine Moussa; Joseph L Chin; Stephen Pautler; Glenn S Bauman; Aaron D Ward
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Learning from crowds in digital pathology using scalable variational Gaussian processes.

Authors:  Miguel López-Pérez; Mohamed Amgad; Pablo Morales-Álvarez; Pablo Ruiz; Lee A D Cooper; Rafael Molina; Aggelos K Katsaggelos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.