Literature DB >> 32715024

Automatic cancer detection on digital histopathology images of mid-gland radical prostatectomy specimens.

Wenchao Han1,2,3, Carol Johnson1, Andrew Warner1, Mena Gaed4, Jose A Gomez4, Madeleine Moussa4, Joseph Chin5,6, Stephen Pautler5,6, Glenn Bauman2,3,5, Aaron D Ward1,2,3,5.   

Abstract

Purpose: Automatic cancer detection on radical prostatectomy (RP) sections facilitates graphical and quantitative surgical pathology reporting, which can potentially benefit postsurgery follow-up care and treatment planning. It can also support imaging validation studies using a histologic reference standard and pathology research studies. This problem is challenging due to the large sizes of digital histopathology whole-mount whole-slide images (WSIs) of RP sections and staining variability across different WSIs. Approach: We proposed a calibration-free adaptive thresholding algorithm, which compensates for staining variability and yields consistent tissue component maps (TCMs) of the nuclei, lumina, and other tissues. We used and compared three machine learning methods for classifying each cancer versus noncancer region of interest (ROI) throughout each WSI: (1) conventional machine learning methods and 14 texture features extracted from TCMs, (2) transfer learning with pretrained AlexNet fine-tuned by TCM ROIs, and (3) transfer learning with pretrained AlexNet fine-tuned with raw image ROIs.
Results: The three methods yielded areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96, 0.98, and 0.98, respectively, in leave-one-patient-out cross validation using 1.3 million ROIs from 286 mid-gland whole-mount WSIs from 68 patients.
Conclusion: Transfer learning with the use of TCMs demonstrated state-of-the-art overall performance and is more stable with respect to sample size across different tissue types. For the tissue types involving Gleason 5 (most aggressive) cancer, it achieved the best performance compared to the other tested methods. This tool can be translated to clinical workflow to assist graphical and quantitative pathology reporting for surgical specimens upon further multicenter validation.
© 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  machine learning; prostate cancer detection; radical prostatectomy pathology; tissue component segmentation; transfer learning; whole-slide histopathology imaging

Year:  2020        PMID: 32715024      PMCID: PMC7363935          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.4.047501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  32 in total

1.  Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Andrew J Evans; Pauline C Henry; Theodorus H Van der Kwast; Douglas C Tkachuk; Kemp Watson; Gina A Lockwood; Neil E Fleshner; Carol Cheung; Eric C Belanger; Mahul B Amin; Liliane Boccon-Gibod; David G Bostwick; Lars Egevad; Jonathan I Epstein; David J Grignon; Edward C Jones; Rodolfo Montironi; Madeleine Moussa; Joan M Sweet; Kiril Trpkov; Thomas M Wheeler; John R Srigley
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.394

2. 

Authors:  Jonathan I Izawa
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Whole slide imaging: uses and limitations for surgical pathology and teaching.

Authors:  B F Boyce
Journal:  Biotech Histochem       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Evaluating stability of histomorphometric features across scanner and staining variations: prostate cancer diagnosis from whole slide images.

Authors:  Patrick Leo; George Lee; Natalie N C Shih; Robin Elliott; Michael D Feldman; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-10-24

5.  Registration of prostate histology images to ex vivo MR images via strand-shaped fiducials.

Authors:  Eli Gibson; Cathie Crukley; Mena Gaed; José A Gómez; Madeleine Moussa; Joseph L Chin; Glenn S Bauman; Aaron Fenster; Aaron D Ward
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Multifeature prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleason grading of histological images.

Authors:  Ali Tabesh; Mikhail Teverovskiy; Ho-Yuen Pang; Vinay P Kumar; David Verbel; Angeliki Kotsianti; Olivier Saidi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Prostate histopathology: learning tissue component histograms for cancer detection and classification.

Authors:  Lena Gorelick; Olga Veksler; Mena Gaed; Jose A Gomez; Madeleine Moussa; Glenn Bauman; Aaron Fenster; Aaron D Ward
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan; Thomas M Pisansky; Kevin M Slawin; Eric A Klein; Mitchell S Anscher; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Daniel W Lin; Jeffrey D Forman; Michael J Zelefsky; Larry L Kestin; Claus G Roehrborn; Charles N Catton; Theodore L DeWeese; Stanley L Liauw; Richard K Valicenti; Deborah A Kuban; Alan Pollack
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Proposal of a post-prostatectomy clinical target volume based on pre-operative MRI: volumetric and dosimetric comparison to the RTOG guidelines.

Authors:  Jennifer Croke; Jillian Maclean; Balazs Nyiri; Yan Li; Kyle Malone; Leonard Avruch; Cathleen Kayser; Shawn Malone
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis.

Authors:  Geert Litjens; Clara I Sánchez; Nadya Timofeeva; Meyke Hermsen; Iris Nagtegaal; Iringo Kovacs; Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Peter Bult; Bram van Ginneken; Jeroen van der Laak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.