Literature DB >> 34825131

Application of Machine Learning Algorithms in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Classification.

Clement G Yedjou1, Solange S Tchounwou2, Richard A Aló3, Rashid Elhag1, BereKet Mochona4, Lekan Latinwo1.   

Abstract

Breast cancer continues to be the most frequent cancer in females, affecting about one in 8 women and causing the highest number of cancer-related deaths in females worldwide despite remarkable progress in early diagnosis, screening, and patient management. All breast lesions are not malignant, and all the benign lesions do not progress to cancer. However, the accuracy of diagnosis can be increased by a combination or preoperative tests such as physical examination, mammography, fine-needle aspiration cytology, and core needle biopsy. Despite some limitations, these procedures are more accurate, reliable, and acceptable, when compared with a single adopted diagnostic procedure. Recent studies have shown that breast cancer can be accurately predicted and diagnosed using machine learning (ML) technology. The objective of this study was to explore the application of ML approaches to classify breast cancer based on feature values generated from a digitized image of a fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of a breast mass. To achieve this objective, we used ML algorithms, collected a scientific dataset of 569 breast cancer patients from Kaggle (https://www.kaggle.com/uciml/breast-cancer-wisconsin-data), analyze and interpreted the data based on ten real-valued features of a breast mass FNA including the radius, texture, perimeter, area, smoothness, compactness, concavity, concave points, symmetry, and fractal dimension. Among the 569 patients tested, 63% were diagnosed with benign breast cancer and 37% were diagnosed with malignant breast cancer. Benign tumors grow slowly and do not spread while malignant tumors grow rapidly and spread to other parts of the body.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; benign; computer-based learning; machine learning; malignant

Year:  2021        PMID: 34825131      PMCID: PMC8612371     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sci Acad Res        ISSN: 2582-6425


  32 in total

1.  Prediction of prostate carcinoma stage by quantitative biopsy pathology.

Authors:  R W Veltri; M C Miller; A W Partin; E C Poole; G J O'Dowd
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Breast Cancer Screening, Mammography, and Other Modalities.

Authors:  James V Fiorica
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Ultrasound-Guided Breast Cancer Cryoablation.

Authors:  Robert C Ward; Ana P Lourenco; Martha B Mainiero
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Clinical predictors of upgrading to Gleason grade 4 or 5 disease at radical prostatectomy: potential implications for patient selection for radiation and androgen suppression therapy.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; A A Renshaw; L Arsenault; D Schultz; J P Richie
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review.

Authors:  Rongrong Guo; Guolan Lu; Binjie Qin; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Machine learning techniques to diagnose breast cancer from image-processed nuclear features of fine needle aspirates.

Authors:  W H Wolberg; W N Street; O L Mangasarian
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence radiogenomics for advancing precision and effectiveness in oncologic care (Review).

Authors:  Eleftherios Trivizakis; Georgios Z Papadakis; Ioannis Souglakos; Nikolaos Papanikolaou; Lefteris Koumakis; Demetrios A Spandidos; Aristidis Tsatsakis; Apostolos H Karantanas; Kostas Marias
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.650

8.  Exploring automatic prostate histopathology image Gleason grading via local structure modeling.

Authors:  Daihou Wang; David J Foran; Jian Ren; Hua Zhong; Isaac Y Kim; Xin Qi
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015

9.  Breast cancer outcome prediction with tumour tissue images and machine learning.

Authors:  Riku Turkki; Dmitrii Byckhov; Mikael Lundin; Jorma Isola; Stig Nordling; Panu E Kovanen; Clare Verrill; Karl von Smitten; Heikki Joensuu; Johan Lundin; Nina Linder
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Diagnostic value of MRI combined with ultrasound for lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: Protocol for a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dechun Cai; Tong Lin; Kailin Jiang; Zhizhong Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

View more
  2 in total

1.  Improving Invasive Breast Cancer Care Using Machine Learning Technology.

Authors:  Clement G Yedjou; Solange S Tchounwou; Jameka Grigsby; Kearra Johnson; Paul B Tchounwou
Journal:  J Biomed Res Environ Sci       Date:  2022-08-30

Review 2.  Automatic Segmentation of Calcification Areas in Digital Breast Images.

Authors:  Ammar Akram Abdulrazzaq; Yasser Muhammed; Asaad T Al-Douri; A A Hamad Mohamad; Abdelrahman Mohamed Ibrahim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.246

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.