Literature DB >> 30339299

Task errors contribute to implicit aftereffects in sensorimotor adaptation.

Li-Ann Leow1, Welber Marinovic2, Aymar de Rugy3, Timothy J Carroll1.   

Abstract

Perturbations of sensory feedback evoke sensory prediction errors (discrepancies between predicted and actual sensory outcomes of movements), and reward prediction errors (discrepancies between predicted rewards and actual rewards). When our task is to hit a target, we expect to succeed in hitting the target, and so we experience a reward prediction error if the perturbation causes us to miss it. These discrepancies between intended task outcomes and actual task outcomes, termed "task errors," are thought to drive the use of strategic processes to restore success, although their role is incompletely understood. Here, as participants adapted to a 30° rotation of cursor feedback representing hand position, we investigated the role of task errors in sensorimotor adaptation: during target-reaching, we either removed task errors by moving the target mid-movement to align with cursor feedback of hand position, or enforced task error by moving the target away from the cursor feedback of hand position, by 20-30° randomly (clockwise in half the trials, counterclockwise in half the trials). Removing task errors not only reduced the extent of adaptation during exposure to the perturbation, but also reduced the amount of post-adaptation aftereffects that persisted despite explicit knowledge of the perturbation removal. Hence, task errors contribute to implicit adaptation resulting from sensory prediction errors. This suggests that the system which predicts the sensory consequences of actions via exposure to sensory prediction errors is also sensitive to reward prediction errors.
© 2018 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implicit learning; reward prediction errors; sensory prediction errors; task errors; visuomotor rotation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30339299     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  22 in total

1.  Relative sensitivity of explicit reaiming and implicit motor adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah A Hutter; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Task Errors Drive Memories That Improve Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Authors:  Li-Ann Leow; Welber Marinovic; Aymar de Rugy; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The influence of task outcome on implicit motor learning.

Authors:  Hyosub E Kim; Darius E Parvin; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Did We Get Sensorimotor Adaptation Wrong? Implicit Adaptation as Direct Policy Updating Rather than Forward-Model-Based Learning.

Authors:  Alkis M Hadjiosif; John W Krakauer; Adrian M Haith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Early stages of sensorimotor map acquisition: learning with free exploration, without active movement or global structure.

Authors:  F T van Vugt; D J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Implicit adaptation to mirror reversal is in the correct coordinate system but the wrong direction.

Authors:  Tianhe Wang; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Motor learning without movement.

Authors:  Olivia A Kim; Alexander D Forrence; Samuel D McDougle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  Individual sensorimotor adaptation characteristics are independent across orofacial speech movements and limb reaching movements.

Authors:  Nick M Kitchen; Kwang S Kim; Prince Z Wang; Robert J Hermosillo; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.974

9.  Revisiting the Role of the Medial Temporal Lobe in Motor Learning.

Authors:  Samuel D McDougle; Sarah A Wilterson; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 10.  The Psychology of Reaching: Action Selection, Movement Implementation, and Sensorimotor Learning.

Authors:  Hyosub E Kim; Guy Avraham; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 24.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.