Literature DB >> 31433958

Early stages of sensorimotor map acquisition: learning with free exploration, without active movement or global structure.

F T van Vugt1,2, D J Ostry1,2.   

Abstract

One of the puzzles of learning to talk or play a musical instrument is how we learn which movement produces a particular sound: an audiomotor map. The initial stages of map acquisition can be studied by having participants learn arm movements to auditory targets. The key question is what mechanism drives this early learning. Three learning processes from previous literature were tested: map learning may rely on active motor outflow (target), on error correction, and on the correspondence between sensory and motor distances (i.e., that similar movements map to similar sounds). Alternatively, we hypothesized that map learning can proceed without these. Participants made movements that were mapped to sounds in a number of different conditions that each precluded one of the potential learning processes. We tested whether map learning relies on assumptions about topological continuity by exposing participants to a permuted map that did not preserve distances in auditory and motor space. Further groups were tested who passively experienced the targets, kinematic trajectories produced by a robot arm, and auditory feedback as a yoked active participant (hence without active motor outflow). Another group made movements without receiving targets (thus without experiencing errors). In each case we observed substantial learning, therefore none of the three hypothesized processes is required for learning. Instead early map acquisition can occur with free exploration without target error correction, is based on sensory-to-sensory correspondences, and possible even for discontinuous maps. The findings are consistent with the idea that early sensorimotor map formation can involve instance-specific learning.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study tested learning of novel sensorimotor maps in a variety of unusual circumstances, including learning a mapping that was permuted in such as way that it fragmented the sensorimotor workspace into discontinuous parts, thus not preserving sensory and motor topology. Participants could learn this mapping, and they could learn without motor outflow or targets. These results point to a robust learning mechanism building on individual instances, inspired from machine learning literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  error correction; motor learning; sensorimotor mapping; speech; topology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31433958      PMCID: PMC6843110          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00429.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  48 in total

1.  Generalization of dynamics learning across changes in movement amplitude.

Authors:  Andrew A G Mattar; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Remapping hand movements in a novel geometrical environment.

Authors:  Kristine M Mosier; Robert A Scheidt; Santiago Acosta; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Decomposition of a sensory prediction error signal for visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Peter A Butcher; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of error-based motor learning.

Authors:  Rachael D Seidler; Youngbin Kwak; Brett W Fling; Jessica A Bernard
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  The Structure and Acquisition of Sensorimotor Maps.

Authors:  Floris T van Vugt; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Adaptation of sound localization induced by rotated visual feedback in reaching movements.

Authors:  Florian A Kagerer; Jose L Contreras-Vidal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Constructive incremental learning from only local information

Authors: 
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  Active versus passive training of a complex bimanual task: is prescriptive proprioceptive information sufficient for inducing motor learning?

Authors:  Iseult A M Beets; Marc Macé; Raf L J Meesen; Koen Cuypers; Oron Levin; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sensory prediction errors, not performance errors, update memories in visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Kangwoo Lee; Youngmin Oh; Jun Izawa; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Motor learning without moving: Proprioceptive and predictive hand localization after passive visuoproprioceptive discrepancy training.

Authors:  Ahmed A Mostafa; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Early stages of sensorimotor map acquisition: neurochemical signature in primary motor cortex and its relation to functional connectivity.

Authors:  F T van Vugt; J Near; T Hennessy; J Doyon; D J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A Framework for Optimizing Co-adaptation in Body-Machine Interfaces.

Authors:  Dalia De Santis
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.650

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.