Literature DB >> 34942649

Revisiting the Role of the Medial Temporal Lobe in Motor Learning.

Samuel D McDougle1, Sarah A Wilterson2, Nicholas B Turk-Browne1, Jordan A Taylor2.   

Abstract

Classic taxonomies of memory distinguish explicit and implicit memory systems, placing motor skills squarely in the latter branch. This assertion is in part a consequence of foundational discoveries showing significant motor learning in amnesics. Those findings suggest that declarative memory processes in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) do not contribute to motor learning. Here, we revisit this issue, testing an individual (L. S. J.) with severe MTL damage on four motor learning tasks and comparing her performance to age-matched controls. Consistent with previous findings in amnesics, we observed that L. S. J. could improve motor performance despite having significantly impaired declarative memory. However, she tended to perform poorly relative to age-matched controls, with deficits apparently related to flexible action selection. Further supporting an action selection deficit, L. S. J. fully failed to learn a task that required the acquisition of arbitrary action-outcome associations. We thus propose a modest revision to the classic taxonomic model: Although MTL-dependent memory processes are not necessary for some motor learning to occur, they play a significant role in the acquisition, implementation, and retrieval of action selection strategies. These findings have implications for our understanding of the neural correlates of motor learning, the psychological mechanisms of skill, and the theory of multiple memory systems.
© 2022 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34942649      PMCID: PMC8832157          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  63 in total

Review 1.  What's new with the amnesic patient H.M.?

Authors:  Suzanne Corkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Task errors contribute to implicit aftereffects in sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Li-Ann Leow; Welber Marinovic; Aymar de Rugy; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Time-dependent competition between goal-directed and habitual response preparation.

Authors:  Robert M Hardwick; Alexander D Forrence; John W Krakauer; Adrian M Haith
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-09-30

4.  Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; John W Krakauer; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Memory-Guided Attention: Independent Contributions of the Hippocampus and Striatum.

Authors:  Elizabeth V Goldfarb; Marvin M Chun; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Delayed feedback during sensorimotor learning selectively disrupts adaptation but not strategy use.

Authors:  Samuel N Brudner; Nikhit Kethidi; Damaris Graeupner; Richard B Ivry; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Hippocampal and ventral medial prefrontal activation during retrieval-mediated learning supports novel inference.

Authors:  Dagmar Zeithamova; April L Dominick; Alison R Preston
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Declarative memory and skill-related knowledge: Evidence from a case study of amnesia and implications for theories of memory.

Authors:  Emma Gregory; Michael McCloskey; Zoe Ovans; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Motor skill depends on knowledge of facts.

Authors:  Jason Stanley; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Dissociable cognitive strategies for sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Samuel D McDougle; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Abstract task representations for inference and control.

Authors:  Avinash R Vaidya; David Badre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 24.482

2.  Reward timing matters in motor learning.

Authors:  Pierre Vassiliadis; Aegryan Lete; Julie Duque; Gerard Derosiere
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-04-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.