Literature DB >> 15930538

Uncemented glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship and outcomes.

Scott David Martin1, David Zurakowski, Thomas S Thornhill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glenoid component loosening continues to be a major factor affecting the long-term survivorship of total shoulder replacements. Radiolucent lines, cement fracture, migration, and loosening requiring revision are common problems with cemented glenoid components. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of total shoulder arthroplasty with an uncemented glenoid component and to identify predictors of glenoid component failure.
METHODS: One hundred and forty-seven consecutive total shoulder arthroplasties were performed in 132 patients (mean age, 63.3 years) with use of an uncemented glenoid component fixed with screws between 1988 and 1996. One hundred and forty shoulders in 124 patients were available for follow-up at an average of 7.5 years. One shoulder in which the arthroplasty had failed at 2.4 years and for which the duration of follow-up was four years was also included for completeness. The preoperative diagnoses included osteoarthritis in seventy-two shoulders and rheumatoid arthritis in fifty-five.
RESULTS: Radiolucency was noted around the glenoid component and/or screws in fifty-three of the 140 shoulders. The mean modified ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons) score (and standard deviation) improved from 15.6 +/- 11.8 points preoperatively to 75.8 +/- 17.5 points at the time of follow-up. Eighty-five shoulders were not painful, forty-two were slightly or mildly painful, ten were moderately painful, and three were severely painful. Fifteen (11%) of the glenoid components failed clinically, and ten of them also had radiographic signs of failure. Eleven other shoulders had radiographic signs of failure but no symptoms at the time of writing. Three factors had a significant independent association with clinical failure: male gender (p = 0.02), pain (p < 0.01), and radiolucency adjacent to the flat tray (p < 0.001). In addition, the annual risk of implant revision was nearly seven times higher for patients with radiographic signs of failure. Clinical survivorship was 95% at five years and 85% at ten years.
CONCLUSIONS: The failure rates of the total shoulder arthroplasties in this study were higher than those in previously reported studies of cemented polyethylene components with similar durations of follow-up. Screw breakage and excessive polyethylene wear were common problems that may lead to additional failures of these uncemented glenoid components in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15930538     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.C.00947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  25 in total

1.  Prospective midterm results of a new convertible glenoid component in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort study.

Authors:  Petra Magosch; Sven Lichtenberg; Mark Tauber; Frank Martetschläger; Peter Habermeyer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian M Buck; Bernhard Jost; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Glenoid replacement for omarthritis : indications, technique, results and new developments].

Authors:  M Pfahler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis: all-polyethylene versus metal-backed glenoid.

Authors:  M O Gauci; N Bonnevialle; G Moineau; M Baba; G Walch; P Boileau
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Revision surgery following total shoulder arthroplasty: analysis of 2588 shoulders over three decades (1976 to 2008).

Authors:  J A Singh; J W Sperling; R H Cofield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-11

Review 6.  [Shoulder prosthesis replacement options : New implants, treatment algorithms and clinical results].

Authors:  D Seybold; T A Schildhauer; J Geßmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  [Differential indications for current endoprosthesis systems of the shoulder].

Authors:  E Wiedemann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Multilevel glenoid morphology and retroversion assessment in Walch B2 and B3 types.

Authors:  Mohammad Samim; Mandeep Virk; David Mai; Kamran Munawar; Joseph Zuckerman; Soterios Gyftopoulos
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Bone grafting severe glenoid defects in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jason J Scalise; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Risk factors for revision after shoulder arthroplasty: 1,825 shoulder arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Bjørg-Tilde S Fevang; Stein A Lie; Leif I Havelin; Arne Skredderstuen; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.