Literature DB >> 12851570

A comparison of hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study.

T Bradley Edwards1, Nimish R Kadakia, Aziz Boulahia, Jean-François Kempf, Pascal Boileau, Chantal Némoz, Gilles Walch.   

Abstract

Six hundred one total shoulder arthroplasties and eighty-nine hemiarthroplasties were performed for primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder. Patients were evaluated with a physical examination, Constant score, and radiographic evaluation. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. At follow-up, the Constant score averaged 64 points, the adjusted Constant score averaged 86%, active anterior elevation averaged 130 degrees, and active external rotation averaged 36 degrees for the hemiarthroplasties. The Constant score averaged 70 points, the adjusted Constant score averaged 96%, active anterior elevation averaged 145 degrees, and active external rotation averaged 42 degrees for the total shoulder arthroplasties. Eighty-six percent of hemiarthroplasties and ninety-four percent of total shoulder arthroplasties had good or excellent results. Differences were statistically significant for all parameters. Total shoulder arthroplasty provided better scores for pain, mobility, and activity than hemiarthroplasty. Fifty-six percent of total shoulder arthroplasties had a radiolucent line around the glenoid component. Total shoulder arthroplasty provides results superior to those of hemiarthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12851570     DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(02)86804-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  67 in total

1.  Prospective study of double-eccentric hemi shoulder arthroplasty in different aetiologies: midterm results.

Authors:  Ulrich Irlenbusch; Georges Blatter; Katja Gebhardt; Geza Pap; Peter Zenz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: an update on indications, technique, results and complication rates.

Authors:  Lorenzo Mattei; Stefano Mortera; Chiara Arrigoni; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-11-03

3.  Resurfacing hemiarthroplasty compared to stemmed hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Jeppe V Rasmussen; Bo S Olsen; Anne Kathrine Sorensen; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Stig Brorson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Total shoulder arthroplasty in older patients: increased perioperative morbidity?

Authors:  Eric T Ricchetti; Joseph A Abboud; Andrew F Kuntz; Matthew L Ramsey; David L Glaser; Gerald R Williams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Factors to consider in joint prosthesis systems.

Authors:  Larry M Wolford
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2006-07

6.  Assessment of radiolucent lines in cemented shoulder hemi-arthroplasties: study of concordance and reproducibility.

Authors:  Carlos Torrens; Santos Martínez-Díaz; Aina Ruiz; Alberto Gines; Enrique Cáceres
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Complications in shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 485 cases.

Authors:  Peter R Aldinger; Patric Raiss; Markus Rickert; Markus Loew
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Shoulder Arthroplasty for Humeral Head Avascular Necrosis Is Associated With Increased Postoperative Complications.

Authors:  M Tyrrell Burrus; Jourdan M Cancienne; Jeffrey D Boatright; Scott Yang; Stephen F Brockmeier; Brian C Werner
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-05-15

9.  Glenoid bone loss in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Amar Malhas; Abbas Rashid; Dave Copas; Steve Bale; Ian Trail
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-05-06

10.  Pain and function in eight hundred and fifty nine patients comparing shoulder hemiprostheses, resurfacing prostheses, reversed total and conventional total prostheses.

Authors:  Bjørg-Tilde S Fevang; Stein H L Lygre; Glenn Bertelsen; Arne Skredderstuen; Leif I Havelin; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.