Literature DB >> 15723018

Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy.

Young W Kwon1, Kimerly A Powell, Jae Kwang Yum, John J Brems, Joseph P Iannotti.   

Abstract

Preoperative evaluation for a total shoulder arthroplasty includes 2-dimensional analysis of the glenoid through either standard radiographs or computed tomography (CT) images. Recent evidence suggests that these 2-dimensional images may actually misrepresent the 3-dimensional (3D) anatomy of the glenoid. Because 3D reconstructions of CT images allow 3D visualization and analysis of the scapula as a free body, we hypothesized that they can reflect the true anatomy of the glenoid more accurately. To test this hypothesis, we obtained various glenoid morphometric measurements from excised cadaveric scapulae as well as their respective 3D CT images. On average, the glenoid version angles measured from the 3D CT images were within 1.0 degrees +/- 0.7 degrees (mean +/- SD) of those from the actual specimen (95% confidence limit, <2.2 degrees for all observers). These measurements from the 3D CT images showed high interobserver and intraobserver reliability (interobserver and intraobserver correlation coefficients, 0.983 and 0.978, respectively). Similarly, measured glenoid surface width and length from the 3D CT images were within 1.8 +/- 1.2 mm and 1.4 +/- 1.1 mm, respectively, of those from the actual specimen. In addition, we were able to estimate the glenoid surface area as well as the glenoid vault volume from the 3D CT images. These values were 8.67 +/- 2.73 cm2 and 11.86 +/- 5.06 cm3, respectively. The mean glenoid vault volume with respect to its surface area was 1.35 +/- 0.24 cm3/cm2 (range, 1.06-1.91 cm3/cm2). These data suggest that 3D CT images can accurately reflect the true anatomy of the glenoid and that they can provide valuable information regarding the glenoid surface and vault. As such, 3D CT images may prove to be a useful tool during the preoperative evaluation for a total shoulder arthroplasty, particularly in patients with significant glenoid bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15723018     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  64 in total

1.  3D morphometric analysis of 43 scapulae.

Authors:  Xavier Ohl; Fabien Billuart; Pierre-Yves Lagacé; Olivier Gagey; Nicola Hagemeister; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Computed tomography morphological analysis of the scapula and its implications in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Catarina N Damas; Joana Silva; Márcia C Sá; João Torres
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-11-14

3.  Sex estimation from measurements of the first rib in a contemporary Polish population.

Authors:  Anna Maria Kubicka; Janusz Piontek
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  The arthritic glenoid: anatomy and arthroplasty designs.

Authors:  Nikolas K Knowles; Louis M Ferreira; George S Athwal
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

Review 5.  Arthroscopic stabilisation for shoulder instability.

Authors:  Konstantinos Fountzoulas; Syed Hassan; Al-Achraf Khoriati; Chu-Hao Chiang; Nicholas Little; Vipul Patel
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-07-17

6.  Projection of the glenoid center point within the glenoid vault.

Authors:  Damian M Rispoli; John W Sperling; George S Athwal; Doris E Wenger; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Excellent side-to-side symmetry in glenoid size and shape.

Authors:  Lin Shi; James F Griffith; Junbin Huang; Defeng Wang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  CT evaluation of total hip arthroplasty complication: dissociation of acetabular component.

Authors:  Eric A Bogner; Carolyn M Sofka
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-02

9.  Glenoid version and size: does gender, ethnicity, or body size play a role?

Authors:  Hristo Ivanov Piponov; David Savin; Neal Shah; Domenic Esposito; Brian Schwartz; Vincent Moretti; Benjamin Goldberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation.

Authors:  Hippolite O Amadi; Sughran Banerjee; Ulrich N Hansen; Andrew L Wallace; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2008-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.