Literature DB >> 30324572

A non-interventional multicenter study to document the implants success and survival rates in daily dental practices of the CONELOG screw-line implant.

Claudio Cacaci1, Karl-Ludwig Ackermann2, Thomas Barth3, Steffen Kistler4, Michael Stiller5, Markus Schlee6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This multicenter prospective non-interventional study evaluated the success and survival of the CONELOG implants inserted according to the standard protocol with one- or two-step surgery in daily practice three years after loading. Changes of soft tissue and bone level over time, esthetical outcome, and patient satisfaction were assessed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included patients in six centers. The implants were used in accordance with standard practice of each particular center, and the use was documented systematically. Failure rate, implant success, bone level changes, different clinical parameters, and patients' satisfaction were assessed.
RESULTS: In total, 130 dental implants were placed in 94 patients (64 female, 30 male). Mean age of patients was 50.4 ± 13.7. At 3-year post-loading, 108 implants in 78 patients were available for evaluation. Success and survival rate were 98.4% after placement and 100% 36 months post-loading. Bone loss from surgery to loading was 0.52 ± 0.55 mm. From loading to 36 months post-loading, the bone level change remained stable. Patient assessments were performed for function, ability to chew, speech, esthetics, and general satisfaction. Patients were very satisfied (82.3%) or satisfied (16.1%). None of the patients was dissatisfied.
CONCLUSION: The 3-year results of this non-interventional multicenter study indicate that the CONELOG implants are reliable and effective over the course of the observation while used in standard conditions of daily environment and confirm the results obtained in controlled clinical trials. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Performance of CONELOG implants under daily routine is similar to controlled clinical trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conical connection; Daily dental practices; Dental implant; Life-table analysis; Success rate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30324572     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2646-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  31 in total

1.  Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients.

Authors:  Daniel Buser; Sigurgísli Ingimarsson; Karl Dula; Adrian Lussi; Hans Peter Hirt; Urs C Belser
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Esthetic outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements assessed by the patient and by prosthodontists.

Authors:  M Chang; P A Odman; J L Wennström; B Andersson
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.681

3.  Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.

Authors:  Gerald Krennmair; Michael Weinländer; Martin Krainhöfner; Eva Piehslinger
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.681

4.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  The influence of non-matching implant and abutment diameters on radiographic crestal bone levels in dogs.

Authors:  Ronald E Jung; Archie A Jones; Frank L Higginbottom; Thomas G Wilson; John Schoolfield; Daniel Buser; Christoph H F Hämmerle; David L Cochran
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.993

6.  The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Gerald Krennmair; Martin Krainhöfner; Eva Piehslinger
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.681

7.  Single implant treatment in healing versus healed sites of the anterior maxilla: a clinical and radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Aryan Eghbali; Hugo De Bruyn; Tim De Rouck; Roberto Cleymaet; Iris Wyn; Jan Cosyn
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.932

Review 8.  One-stage versus two-stage implant placement. A Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Yun Shane Chew; Paul Coulthard; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.123

9.  Oral rehabilitation using Camlog screw-cylinder implants with a particle-blasted and acid-etched microstructured surface. Results from a prospective study with special consideration of short implants.

Authors:  Frank Peter Strietzel; Peter A Reichart
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Clinical field trial examining an implant with a sand-blasted, acid-etched surface.

Authors:  David Cochran; Thomas Oates; Dean Morton; Archie Jones; Daniel Buser; Francoise Peters
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.993

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bone union formation in the rat mandibular symphysis using hydroxyapatite with or without simvastatin: effects on healthy, diabetic, and osteoporotic rats.

Authors:  F Camacho-Alonso; C Martínez-Ortiz; L Plazas-Buendía; A M Mercado-Díaz; C Vilaplana-Vivo; J A Navarro; A J Buendía; J J Merino; Y Martínez-Beneyto
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Assessment of salivary alpha amylase and mucin-4 before and after non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis.

Authors:  Hajer A Aldulaijan; Abeer S Al-Zawawi; Marwa Y Shaheen; Dena Ali; Darshan Devang Divakar; Amani M Basudan
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-07-14

3.  Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Karl-Ludwig Ackermann; Thomas Barth; Claudio Cacaci; Steffen Kistler; Markus Schlee; Michael Stiller
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-04-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.