Literature DB >> 10635203

Esthetic outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements assessed by the patient and by prosthodontists.

M Chang1, P A Odman, J L Wennström, B Andersson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess and compare patients' and clinicians' judgments of the esthetic outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 29 patients with 41 single implant-supported crowns in the maxillary anterior region participated in the study. The esthetic outcome of the implant-supported crowns was assessed by the patients and by 5 prosthodontists by means of a questionnaire in which various esthetics-related variables were addressed and responded to using visual analogue scales. Multiple regression analyses were used to evaluate the influence of the variables on the "overall satisfaction" with the implant-supported crown.
RESULTS: Most variables in the patients' assessments revealed mean values above 90% and median values close to 100%. No single factor used in the multiple regression analysis was found to influence a patient's satisfaction with appearance of the crown at a statistically significant level. The clinicians' degree of satisfaction was for all variables lower than that of the patients. In 89% of the cases the clinicians could correctly locate the single implant-supported crown. Among the variables assessed, surrounding soft tissue appearance and form of the crown had the strongest influence on the clinician's overall satisfaction with the appearance of the crown.
CONCLUSION: Appreciation of the esthetic outcome of the single implant-supported crowns was rated higher by the patients than by the prosthodontists. Furthermore, factors considered by professionals to be of significance for the esthetic result of the restorative treatment may not be of decisive importance for the patient's satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10635203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  14 in total

1.  Impact of abutment material on peri-implant soft tissue color. An in vitro study.

Authors:  Leticia Sala; Antonio Bascones-Martínez; Ana Carrillo-de-Albornoz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A non-interventional multicenter study to document the implants success and survival rates in daily dental practices of the CONELOG screw-line implant.

Authors:  Claudio Cacaci; Karl-Ludwig Ackermann; Thomas Barth; Steffen Kistler; Michael Stiller; Markus Schlee
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Patient satisfaction with oral implant rehabilitation: evaluation of responses to a questionnaire.

Authors:  Susanna Annibali; Anna Rita Vestri; Annalisa Pilotto; Gerardo La Monaca; Stefano Di Carlo; Maria Paola Cristalli
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2011-02-13

4.  Evaluation of subjective satisfaction of dental implant patients.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Kim; Hyun-Suk Kim; Yang-Jin Yi; Pil-Young Yun
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-06-27

5.  Long-term Stability of Soft Tissue Esthetic Outcomes Following Conventional Single Implant Treatment in the Anterior Maxilla: 10-12 Year Results.

Authors:  A Rokn; S H Bassir; A A Rasouli Ghahroudi; M J Kharazifard; R Manesheof
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2016-11-16

Review 6.  Prosthodontic Principles in Dental Implantology: Adjustments in a Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic-Battered Economy.

Authors:  Ricardo A Boyce
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2020-11-06

7.  Aesthetic perception of single implants placed in the anterior zone. A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  G Burgueño-Barris; B Cortés-Acha; R Figueiredo; E Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-07-01

8.  Oral health related quality-of-life outcomes of partially edentulous patients treated with implant-supported single crowns or fixed partial dentures.

Authors:  Bader K AlZarea
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-05-01

9.  Satisfaction level in dental-phobic patients with implant-supported rehabilitation performed under general anaesthesia: a prospective study.

Authors:  Louise Sidenö; Rim Hmaidouch; Jan Brandt; Nadine von Krockow; Paul Weigl
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Comparative in vitro study of two methods for gingival biotype assessment.

Authors:  Leticia Sala; Raquel Alonso-Pérez; Ruben Agustin-Panadero; Alberto Ferreiroa; Ana Carrillo-de-Albornoz
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.