Literature DB >> 30323388

APPE Evaluations are Positively Associated with MMI, Pre-pharmacy GPA and Pharmacy GPA.

Seth D Heldenbrand1, Lindsey E Dayer1, Bradley C Martin1, Catherine O'Brien1, Angie N Choi1, Paul O Gubbins2, Janna Hawthorne1, Morgan Ramey1, Kelsey Willis1, Schwanda K Flowers1.   

Abstract

Objective. To determine factors associated with advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) performance in the pre-pharmacy and Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum and establish whether performance on the multiple mini interview (MMI) independently predicts APPE evaluation scores. Methods. A multi-case MMI has been used in the admissions process since 2008. Students are scored anywhere from 1 to 7 (unsatisfactory to outstanding) on each interview. Traditional factors (GPA, PCAT, etc.) are also used in the admissions determination. Pearson product-moment correlation and ordinary least squares regression were used to explore the relationships between admissions data, pharmacy GPA, and APPE evaluation scores for the graduating classes of 2011-2014. These analyses identified which factors (pharmacy GPA, PCAT, MMI score, age, gender, rurality, resident status, degree, and underrepresented minority status) related to APPE performance. Results. Students (n=432) had a mean APPE score of 4.6; a mean MMI score of 5.5; mean pharmacy GPA, PCAT and age of 3.14, 73.2, 22.6 years, respectively. Pre-pharmacy GPA and pharmacy GPA positively correlated with mean APPE scores. MMI score demonstrated positive correlations with overall APPE score; including subcategories patient care, documentation, drug information/EBM, public health, and communication. MMI scores were positively related to overall APPE scores in the multivariable regression. Variables showing negative associations with APPE scores included a pre-pharmacy GPA of <3.0 (ref= GPA >3.5) and pharmacy school GPA of >3.0 - 3.5 and GPA 2.6 - 3.0 when compared to GPAs >3.5. Conclusion. GPA (pre-pharmacy and pharmacy) and MMI positively correlate with preceptor-rated performances in the APPE year.

Entities:  

Keywords:  admissions; advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE); experiential education; multiple mini-interview (MMI); pharmacy GPA

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30323388      PMCID: PMC6181167          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  16 in total

1.  Predictors of success in pharmacy school: PCAT vs. other admission criteria.

Authors:  W Lowenthal; J Wergin; H L Smith
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Development and pilot testing of a multiple mini-interview for admission to a pharmacy degree program.

Authors:  Andrea J Cameron; Linda D Mackeigan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Limited Predictive Utility of Admissions Scores and Objective Structured Clinical Examinations for APPE Performance.

Authors:  Jacqueline E McLaughlin; Julia Khanova; Kelly Scolaro; Philip T Rodgers; Wendy C Cox
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance.

Authors:  Harold I Reiter; Kevin W Eva; Jack Rosenfeld; Geoffrey R Norman
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Predicting performance in the first-year of pharmacy school.

Authors:  Donald G Meagher; Tianshu Pan; Christina D Perez
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Incorporating multiple mini-interviews in the postgraduate year 1 pharmacy residency program selection process.

Authors:  Douglas R Oyler; Kelly M Smith; E Claire Elson; Heather Bush; Aaron M Cook
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.637

7.  Multiple Mini-Interview Performance Predicts Academic Difficulty in the PharmD Curriculum.

Authors:  Seth D Heldenbrand; Schwanda K Flowers; Bryan J Bordelon; Paul O Gubbins; Catherine O'Brien; Cindy D Stowe; Bradley C Martin
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 8.  White Paper on Pharmacy Admissions: Developing a Diverse Work Force to Meet the Health-Care Needs of an Increasingly Diverse Society: Recommendations of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Special Committee on Admissions.

Authors:  Andrea L Wall; Alex Aljets; Steve C Ellis; Daniel J Hansen; W Mark Moore; Heather M W Petrelli; Marilyn K Speedie; Tom TenHoeve; Cynthia Watchmaker; Janeen S Winnike; Stephanie D Wurth
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Holistic Review in Medical School Admissions and Selection: A Strategic, Mission-Driven Response to Shifting Societal Needs.

Authors:  Sarah S Conrad; Amy N Addams; Geoffrey H Young
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Recognition of community-based pharmacist practitioners: Essential health care providers.

Authors:  Marialice Bennett; Jean-Venable R Goode
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct
View more
  2 in total

1.  Predictors of Student Failure or Poor Performance on Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.

Authors:  William B Call; Gloria R Grice; Katie B Tellor; Anastasia L Armbruster; Anne M Spurlock; Tricia M Berry
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Developing and Implementing an Entrustable Professional Activity Assessment for Pharmacy Practice Experiences.

Authors:  Connie Smith; Roxie Stewart; Gregory Smith; H Glenn Anderson; Scott Baggarly
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.047

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.