Literature DB >> 24481154

Incorporating multiple mini-interviews in the postgraduate year 1 pharmacy residency program selection process.

Douglas R Oyler1, Kelly M Smith, E Claire Elson, Heather Bush, Aaron M Cook.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The incorporation of the multiple mini-interview (MMI) into the postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) pharmacy residency program selection process was evaluated.
METHODS: Four MMI stations evaluating the highest-rated nonacademic attributes of prospective residents (critical thinking, teamwork, ethical reasoning and integrity, and communication and interpersonal skills) were incorporated into the traditional PGY1 residency interview process at an academic medical center. After completion of the interview, candidates and interviewers were surveyed regarding their perceptions of the refined interview process. Data regarding scores on various components of the applicant profile were also compared for significant correlations. Descriptive statistics were calculated for questionnaire responses and individual components of candidate profiles. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated between MMI score, traditional interview score, age, grade point average, application score, college of pharmacy rank, and final candidate rank (subjective score).
RESULTS: A total of 38 candidates were interviewed, 37 of whom completed the postinterview survey. Candidates agreed that the MMI allowed them to convey their abilities effectively; however, they disagreed that it was more effective than traditional interviews. Candidates did not agree that the MMI caused less anxiety than traditional interviews. All 15 interviewers completed the postinterview survey and believed that the MMI effectively evaluated soft skills and that the MMI was more effective than traditional interviews in assessing candidates' abilities, skills, and thought processes.
CONCLUSION: The use of the MMI in a PGY1 pharmacy residency applicant selection process appeared to be well accepted by both candidates and interviewers and likely assesses different attributes than do traditional interview techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24481154     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp130315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  9 in total

1.  Perceptions and Cost-Analysis of a Multiple Mini-Interview in a Pharmacy School Admissions Process.

Authors:  Robin L Corelli; Michael A Muchnik; Ryan J Beechinor; Gary Fong; Eleanor M Vogt; Jennifer M Cocohoba; Candy Tsourounis; Karen Suchanek Hudmon
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Development and Assessment of the Multiple Mini-Interview in a School of Pharmacy Admissions Model.

Authors:  Wendy C Cox; Jacqueline E McLaughlin; David Singer; Margaret Lewis; Melissa M Dinkins
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Application and interview features used to assess applicant qualifications for residency training.

Authors:  Allison R Butts; Kelly M Smith
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2015-02

4.  The Multiple Mini-Interview as an Admission Tool for a PharmD Program Satellite Campus.

Authors:  David Singer; Jacqueline E McLaughlin; Wendy C Cox
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-09-25       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  APPE Evaluations are Positively Associated with MMI, Pre-pharmacy GPA and Pharmacy GPA.

Authors:  Seth D Heldenbrand; Lindsey E Dayer; Bradley C Martin; Catherine O'Brien; Angie N Choi; Paul O Gubbins; Janna Hawthorne; Morgan Ramey; Kelsey Willis; Schwanda K Flowers
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Dermatology residency selection criteria with an emphasis on program characteristics: a national program director survey.

Authors:  Farzam Gorouhi; Ali Alikhan; Arash Rezaei; Nasim Fazel
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2014-03-17

7.  How many schools adopt interviews during the student admission process across the health professions in the United States of America?

Authors:  Greer Glazer; Laura F Startsman; Karen Bankston; Julia Michaels; Jennifer C Danek; Malika Fair
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2016-02-27

Review 8.  Multiple Mini Interview as an admission tool in higher education: Insights from a systematic review.

Authors:  Muhamad S Bahri Yusoff
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-10

9.  Evaluation of Pharmacy Residency Recruitment and Interview Processes during the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020-2021 Application Cycle).

Authors:  Mary Joyce B Wingler; David A Cretella; Jamie L Wagner; Katie E Barber; P Brandon Bookstaver; Lauren Freeman; Elizabeth W Covington; Christopher M Bland; Bruce M Jones; Maicuc Tran; Stefanie A Stramel; Michelle Turner; Darrell Childress; Kayla R Stover
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Pharm       Date:  2022-07-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.