Literature DB >> 33149328

Predictors of Student Failure or Poor Performance on Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.

William B Call1, Gloria R Grice2, Katie B Tellor2, Anastasia L Armbruster2, Anne M Spurlock2, Tricia M Berry2.   

Abstract

Objective. To determine factors predictive of student failure or poor performance on advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) at a single pharmacy program. Methods. This retrospective cohort evaluated students entering the Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) program from 2012-2014 at St. Louis College of Pharmacy. Students who received a grade of F for one or more APPEs (failure group) were compared to all other students (non-failure group). A secondary evaluation compared students with a C or F on one or more APPEs (poor performers) to all other students (non-poor performers). Data were collected on didactic and experiential performance, identifiable professionalism issues from introductory pharmacy practice experiences (IPPEs), and academic honor code violations. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to determine factors associated with APPE failure and poor performance. Results. A total of 669 students were analyzed. Twenty-eight students (4.2%) failed one or more APPEs and 81 students (12.1%) were identified as poor performers (grade of C or F). For the primary outcome, professional grade point average (GPA) of less than 2.7, practicum failure, IPPE professionalism issue(s), and pharmacotherapy course failure were identified for inclusion in the multivariable analysis. The IPPE professionalism issue(s) (HR 4.8 [95% CI 1.9-12.4]) and pharmacotherapy course failure (HR 4.2 [95% CI, 1.6-11.1]) were associated with APPE failure on multivariable regression. On the secondary analysis, the same variables were identified for multivariable regression, with professional GPA of less than 2.7 (HR 2.7 [95% CI 1.5-5]), IPPE professionalism issue(s) (HR 3.9 [95% CI 2.2-6.9]), and pharmacotherapy course failure (HR 2.0 [95% CI 1.1-3.7]) associated with poor performance. Conclusion. Poor academic performance and/or identified unprofessional behavior while completing IPPEs are associated with APPE failure and poor performance. Interventions should be aimed at identifying at-risk students and addressing risk factors prior to APPEs.
© 2020 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  APPE failure; APPE performance; APPE readiness; advanced pharmacy practice experiences; professionalism

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33149328      PMCID: PMC7596595          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  20 in total

Review 1.  A review of remediation programs in pharmacy and other health professions.

Authors:  David F Maize; Stephen H Fuller; Philip M Hritcko; Rae R Matsumoto; Denise A Soltis; Reza R Taheri; Wendy Duncan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Limited Predictive Utility of Admissions Scores and Objective Structured Clinical Examinations for APPE Performance.

Authors:  Jacqueline E McLaughlin; Julia Khanova; Kelly Scolaro; Philip T Rodgers; Wendy C Cox
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  Including the assessment of nontraditional factors in pharmacy school admissions.

Authors:  David A Latif
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  The impact of problem-based learning on students' perceptions of preparedness for advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

Authors:  Shirley Hogan; Lisa M Lundquist
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Grading trends and evaluation of student performance across advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPE) in the Big Ten Academic Alliance (The GRAPPES study).

Authors:  Toyin Tofade; Brian M Shepler; Donna M Feudo; Mara A Kieser; Christene Jolowsky; Monica L Miller; Donald Sullivan; Susan S Vos; Mark Brueckl; Paul C Walker
Journal:  Curr Pharm Teach Learn       Date:  2018-09-03

6.  Preadmission predictors of academic performance in a pharmacy program: A longitudinal, multi-cohort study.

Authors:  James M Windle; Rachel A Spronken-Smith; Jeffrey K Smith; Ian G Tucker
Journal:  Curr Pharm Teach Learn       Date:  2018-06-21

7.  Academic progression and retention policies of colleges and schools of pharmacy.

Authors:  Therese I Poirier; Theresa M Kerr; Stephanie J Phelps
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  An assessment program using standardized clients to determine student readiness for clinical practice.

Authors:  Ronald E Ragan; David W Virtue; Susan J Chi
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  A Modeling Exercise to Identify Predictors of Student Readiness for Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.

Authors:  Heather Nyman; Krystal Moorman; Casey Tak; Holly Gurgle; Craig Henchey; Mark A Munger
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Patient simulation to demonstrate students' competency in core domain abilities prior to beginning advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

Authors:  Deepti Vyas; Nilesh S Bhutada; Xiaodong Feng
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.