Literature DB >> 17607328

Individual Differences in Metacognitive Responsiveness: Cognitive and Personality Correlates.

David A Washburn1, J David Smith, Lauren A Taglialatela.   

Abstract

Individuals differ not only in the ability to make decisions, but also in the degree to which they respond adaptively to uncertainty about those decisions. We examined how optimally 124 participants used an uncertain response on near-threshold trials of a psychophysical task. All participants showed overconfidence, but women tended to be more adaptive than men in responsiveness to uncertainty. Participants who responded to uncertainty most optimally exhibited more cognitive failures, fewer attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder symptoms, greater need for closure, better attention scanning skills, but larger effects of Stroop-task incongruity compared with participants who were least optimal in responsiveness to uncertainty. These data suggest that response competition might provide a mechanism for the cognitive experience of uncertainty.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 17607328      PMCID: PMC1905888          DOI: 10.3200/GENP.132.4.446-461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Psychol        ISSN: 0022-1309


  15 in total

1.  Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-03

Review 2.  A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience.

Authors:  A S Brown
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Judgment and decision: theory and application.

Authors:  G F Pitz; N J Sachs
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.

Authors:  T O Nelson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  The Stroop revisited: a meta-analysis of interference control in AD/HD.

Authors:  Rosa van Mourik; Jaap Oosterlaan; Joseph A Sergeant
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 8.982

7.  The uncertain response in humans and animals.

Authors:  J D Smith; W E Shields; J Schull; D A Washburn
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1997-01

8.  Adults' versus children's performance on the Stroop task: interference and facilitation.

Authors:  Barlow C Wright; Amanda Wanley
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2003-11

9.  Local and global judgments of confidence.

Authors:  Varda Liberman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The comparative psychology of uncertainty monitoring and metacognition.

Authors:  J David Smith; Wendy E Shields; David A Washburn
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 12.579

View more
  7 in total

1.  Flexible mechanisms underlie the evaluation of visual confidence.

Authors:  Simon Barthelmé; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Regional gray matter volume mediates the relationship between family socioeconomic status and depression-related trait in a young healthy sample.

Authors:  Junyi Yang; Huijuan Liu; Dongtao Wei; Wei Liu; Jie Meng; Kangcheng Wang; Lei Hao; Jiang Qiu
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Factors Affecting Student Time to Examination Completion.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; Hannah Mierzwa
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 4.  The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Neural and behavioral signature of human social perception.

Authors:  Ana Saitovitch; Hervé Lemaitre; Elza Rechtman; Alice Vinçon-Leite; Raphael Calmon; David Grévent; Volodia Dangouloff-Ros; Francis Brunelle; Nathalie Boddaert; Monica Zilbovicius
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Visual search as an embodied process: The effects of perspective change and external reference on search performance.

Authors:  Huiyuan Zhang; Jing Samantha Pan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

7.  Relating introspective accuracy to individual differences in brain structure.

Authors:  Stephen M Fleming; Rimona S Weil; Zoltan Nagy; Raymond J Dolan; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 47.728

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.