Literature DB >> 30307763

Accuracy assessment of a novel image-free handheld robot for Total Knee Arthroplasty in a cadaveric study.

Michael Casper1, Riddhit Mitra1, Rahul Khare1, Branislav Jaramaz1, Brian Hamlin2, Brian McGinley3, David Mayman4, Jeff Headrick5, Kenneth Urish6,7,8, Mark Gittins9, Stephen Incavo10,11, Vivek Neginhal12.   

Abstract

Surgical navigation has been shown to improve the accuracy of bone preparation and limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Previous work has shown the effectiveness of various types of navigation systems. Here, for the first time, we assessed the accuracy of a novel imageless semiautonomous handheld robotic sculpting system in performing bone resection and preparation in TKA using cadaveric specimens. In this study, we compared the planned and final implant placement in 18 cadaveric specimens undergoing TKA using the new tool. Eight surgeons carried out the procedures using three types of implant designs. A quantitative analysis was performed to determine the translational, angular, and rotational differences between the planned and achieved positions of the implants. The mean femoral flexion, varus/valgus, and rotational error was -2.0°, -0.1°, and -0.5°, respectively. The mean tibial posterior slope, and varus/valgus error was -0.2°, and -0.2°, respectively. We obtained higher flexion errors for the femoral implant when using cut-guides as compared to using a bur for cutting the bones. The image-free robotic sculpting tool achieved accurate implementation of the surgical plan with small errors in implant placement. Future studies will focus on determining how well the accurate implant placement translates into a clinical and functional benefit for the patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; cadaver study; navigation; robot-assisted; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30307763      PMCID: PMC6309369          DOI: 10.1080/24699322.2018.1519038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon)        ISSN: 2469-9322            Impact factor:   1.787


  27 in total

Review 1.  Computer assisted surgery for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Nizard
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 0.500

2.  Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies.

Authors:  Yaron S Brin; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Lawrence Joseph; David J Zukor; John Antoniou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  J A Rand; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rolf G Haaker; Martin Stockheim; Michael Kamp; Gunnar Proff; Johannes Breitenfelder; Andreas Ottersbach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement.

Authors:  R S Jeffery; R W Morris; R A Denham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

6.  Accuracy of a freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee replacement.

Authors:  Julie R Smith; Philip E Riches; Philip J Rowe
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 2.547

7.  No difference in accuracy between pinless and conventional computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C Baier; G Maderbacher; H R Springorum; F Zeman; W Fitz; J Schaumburger; J Grifka; J Beckmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M H Oswald; R P Jakob; E Schneider; H M Hoogewoud
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation.

Authors:  Ralf Decking; Yma Markmann; Johannes Fuchs; Wolfhart Puhl; Hanns-Peter Scharf
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?

Authors:  Peter F Sharkey; William J Hozack; Richard H Rothman; Shani Shastri; Sidney M Jacoby
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  6 in total

1.  The Use of Computerized Tomography Scans in Elective Knee and Hip Arthroplasty-What Do They Tell Us and at What Risk?

Authors:  Taylor D'Amore; Gregg Klein; Jess Lonner
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-05-05

2.  Preliminary experience with an image-free handheld robot for total knee arthroplasty: 77 cases compared with a matched control group.

Authors:  P Bollars; A Boeckxstaens; J Mievis; S Kalaai; M G M Schotanus; D Janssen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-01-16

3.  Current role of handheld navigation system in total knee arthroplasty: where we are?

Authors:  Jong-Heon Kim; Woo-Sung Kim; Hyun-Soo Ok; Seong Hwan Kim
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03

Review 4.  Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Pei Liu; Fei-Fan Lu; Guo-Jie Liu; Xiao-Hong Mu; Yong-Qiang Sun; Qi-Dong Zhang; Wei-Guo Wang; Wan-Shou Guo
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-05-02

Review 5.  The current state of robotics in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre St Mart; En Lin Goh
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-04-01

6.  Imageless robotic handpiece-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a learning curve analysis of surgical time and alignment accuracy.

Authors:  Peter Savov; Lars-Rene Tuecking; Henning Windhagen; Jonathan Ehmig; Max Ettinger
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.067

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.