Literature DB >> 30295660

The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb.

Marcus Yu Bin Pai1, Thais Tavares Terranova2, Marcel Simis2, Felipe Fregni3, Linamara Rizzo Battistella2.   

Abstract

Neurologic disorders such as stroke and cerebral palsy are leading causes of long-term disability and can lead to severe incapacity and restriction of daily activities due to lower and upper limb impairments. Intensive physical and occupational therapy are still considered main treatments, but new adjunct therapies to standard rehabilitation that may optimize functional outcomes are being studied. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that polarizes underlying brain regions through the application of weak direct currents through electrodes on the scalp, modulating cortical excitability. Increased interest in this technique can be attributed to its low cost, ease of use, and effects on human neural plasticity. Recent research has been performed to determine the clinical potential of tDCS in diverse conditions such as depression, Parkinson's disease, and motor rehabilitation after stroke. tDCS helps enhance brain plasticity and seems to be a promising technique in rehabilitation programs. A number of robotic devices have been developed to assist in the rehabilitation of upper limb function after stroke. The rehabilitation of motor deficits is often a long process requiring multidisciplinary approaches for a patient to achieve maximum independence. These devices do not intend to replace manual rehabilitation therapy; instead, they were designed as an additional tool to rehabilitation programs, allowing immediate perception of results and tracking of improvements, thus helping patients to stay motivated. Both tDSC and robot-assisted therapy are promising add-ons to stroke rehabilitation and target the modulation of brain plasticity, with several reports describing their use to be associated with conventional therapy and the improvement of therapeutic outcomes. However, more recently, some small clinical trials have been developed that describe the associated use of tDCS and robot-assisted therapy in stroke rehabilitation. In this article, we describe the combined methods used in our institute for improving motor performance after stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30295660      PMCID: PMC6235287          DOI: 10.3791/58495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  32 in total

1.  Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Daniella Terney; Csaba Poreisz; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: an exploratory, randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  Stefan Hesse; Andreas Waldner; Jan Mehrholz; Christopher Tomelleri; Michael Pohl; Cordula Werner
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Modulation of training by single-session transcranial direct current stimulation to the intact motor cortex enhances motor skill acquisition of the paretic hand.

Authors:  Máximo Zimerman; Kirstin F Heise; Julia Hoppe; Leonardo G Cohen; Christian Gerloff; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Optimizing recovery potential through simultaneous occupational therapy and non-invasive brain-stimulation using tDCS.

Authors:  Dinesh G Nair; Vijay Renga; Robert Lindenberg; Lin Zhu; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke.

Authors:  Dae-Yul Kim; Jong-Yub Lim; Eun Kyoung Kang; Dae Sang You; Min-Kyun Oh; Byung-Mo Oh; Nam-Jong Paik
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 6.  Controversy: Noninvasive and invasive cortical stimulation show efficacy in treating stroke patients.

Authors:  Friedhelm C Hummel; Pablo Celnik; Alvero Pascual-Leone; Felipe Fregni; Winston D Byblow; Cathrin M Buetefisch; John Rothwell; Leonardo G Cohen; Christian Gerloff
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 7.  Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Boudewijn J Kollen; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Effects of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation combined with robotic therapy on severely affected arms in chronic stroke patients.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Ochi; Satoru Saeki; Taiji Oda; Yasuyuki Matsushima; Kenji Hachisuka
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Effects of task-oriented robot training on arm function, activity, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Annick A A Timmermans; Ryanne J M Lemmens; Maurice Monfrance; Richard P J Geers; Wilbert Bakx; Rob J E M Smeets; Henk A M Seelen
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  The ineffective role of cathodal tDCS in enhancing the functional motor outcomes in early phase of stroke rehabilitation: an experimental trial.

Authors:  Augusto Fusco; Federica Assenza; Marco Iosa; Simona Izzo; Riccardo Altavilla; Stefano Paolucci; Fabrizio Vernieri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Discussion on the Rehabilitation of Stroke Hemiplegia Based on Interdisciplinary Combination of Medicine and Engineering.

Authors:  Xiaowei Sun; Ke Xu; Yuqing Shi; Hongtao Li; Ruobing Li; Siyu Yang; Hong Jin; Chuwen Feng; Baitao Li; Chunyue Xing; Yuanyuan Qu; Qingyong Wang; Yinghua Chen; Tiansong Yang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Enhancer reprogramming in PRC2-deficient malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors induces a targetable de-differentiated state.

Authors:  Veena Kochat; Ayush T Raman; Sharon M Landers; Ming Tang; Jonathan Schulz; Christopher Terranova; Jace P Landry; Angela D Bhalla; Hannah C Beird; Chia-Chin Wu; Yingda Jiang; Xizeng Mao; Rossana Lazcano; Swati Gite; Davis R Ingram; Min Yi; Jianhua Zhang; Emily Z Keung; Christopher P Scally; Christina L Roland; Kelly K Hunt; Barry W Feig; P Andrew Futreal; Patrick Hwu; Wei-Lien Wang; Alexander J Lazar; John M Slopis; Heather Wilson-Robles; Dominique J Wiener; Ian E McCutcheon; Brandan Wustefeld-Janssens; Kunal Rai; Keila E Torres
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 17.088

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.