Literature DB >> 20962598

Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke.

Dae-Yul Kim1, Jong-Yub Lim, Eun Kyoung Kang, Dae Sang You, Min-Kyun Oh, Byung-Mo Oh, Nam-Jong Paik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that 10 sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with occupational therapy elicit more improvement in motor function of the paretic upper limb than sham stimulation in patients with subacute stroke.
DESIGN: Eighteen patients with subacute stroke with hand motor impairment were randomly assigned to one of the three 10-day sessions of (a) anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the affected motor cortex, (b) cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the unaffected motor cortex, or (c) sham stimulation. Blinded evaluators assessed upper limb motor impairment and global functional state with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment score and the Modified Barthel Index at baseline, 1 day after stimulation, and 6 mos after stimulation.
RESULTS: Baseline scores for Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Modified Barthel Index were comparable in all groups (P > 0.05). At 6-mo follow-up, cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation led to a greater improvement in Fugl-Meyer Assessment than the sham procedure (P < 0.05). There was a significant inverse correlation between baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Fugl-Meyer Assessment increase at 6 mos (r = -0.846; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a potentially beneficial effect of noninvasive cortical stimulation during rehabilitative motor training of patients who have suffered from subacute strokes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20962598     DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181f70aa7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  56 in total

1.  Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke.

Authors:  Lynley V Bradnam; Cathy M Stinear; P Alan Barber; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado; Corin Bonnett; Daniel Janini; Sarah Roelle; Kelsey Potter-Baker; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Xiaofeng Wang; Guang Yue; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Analysis of the Factors Related to the Effectiveness of Transcranial Current Stimulation in Upper Limb Motor Function Recovery after Stroke: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  María Antonia Fuentes Calderón; Ainhoa Navarro Miralles; Mauricio Jaramillo Pimienta; Jesús María Gonçalves Estella; María José Sánchez Ledesma
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 5.  Spontaneous and Therapeutic-Induced Mechanisms of Functional Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 6.829

6.  Behavioral and neurological effects of tDCS on speech motor recovery: A single-subject intervention study.

Authors:  Adam Buchwald; Nicolette Khosa; Stacey Rimikis; E Susan Duncan
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Motor Recovery Studies Exhibit a Dose-Response Relationship.

Authors:  Pratik Y Chhatbar; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Steven Kautz; Mark S George; Robert J Adams; Wuwei Feng
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients - A phase I current escalation study.

Authors:  Pratik Y Chhatbar; Rong Chen; Rachael Deardorff; Blair Dellenbach; Steven A Kautz; Mark S George; Wuwei Feng
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Challenges in Recruitment for the Study of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke: Lessons from Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Kelsey A Potter-Baker; Corin E Bonnett; Patrick Chabra; Sarah Roelle; Nicole Varnerin; David A Cunningham; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Svetlana Pundik; Adriana B Conforto; Andre G Machado; Ela B Plow
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 10.  Motor System Reorganization After Stroke: Stimulating and Training Toward Perfection.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones; DeAnna L Adkins
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.