Literature DB >> 22618381

Modulation of training by single-session transcranial direct current stimulation to the intact motor cortex enhances motor skill acquisition of the paretic hand.

Máximo Zimerman1, Kirstin F Heise, Julia Hoppe, Leonardo G Cohen, Christian Gerloff, Friedhelm C Hummel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Mechanisms of skill learning are paramount components for stroke recovery. Recent noninvasive brain stimulation studies demonstrated that decreasing activity in the contralesional motor cortex might be beneficial, providing transient functional improvements after stroke. The more crucial question, however, is whether this intervention can also enhance the acquisition of complex motor tasks, yielding longer-lasting functional improvements. In the present study, we tested the capacity of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the contralesional motor cortex during training to enhance the acquisition and retention of complex sequential finger movements of the paretic hand.
METHOD: Twelve well-recovered chronic patients with subcortical stroke attended 2 training sessions during which either cathodal tDCS or a sham intervention were applied to the contralesional motor cortex in a double-blind, crossover design. Two different motor sequences, matched for their degree of complexity, were tested in a counterbalanced order during as well as 90 minutes and 24 hours after the intervention. Potential underlying mechanisms were evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation.
RESULTS: tDCS facilitated the acquisition of a new motor skill compared with sham stimulation (P=0.04) yielding better task retention results. A significant correlation was observed between the tDCS-induced improvement during training and the tDCS-induced changes of intracortical inhibition (R(2)=0.63).
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that tDCS is a promising tool to improve not only motor behavior, but also procedural learning. They further underline the potential of noninvasive brain stimulation as an adjuvant treatment for long-term recovery, at least in patients with mild functional impairment after stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22618381      PMCID: PMC4879963          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  45 in total

1.  Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke.

Authors:  Lynley V Bradnam; Cathy M Stinear; P Alan Barber; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Hand motor recovery after stroke: tuning the orchestra to improve hand motor function.

Authors:  Felipe Fregni; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex on movement kinematics and neural activity in subcortical stroke.

Authors:  Dennis A Nowak; Christian Grefkes; Manuel Dafotakis; Simon Eickhoff; Jutta Küst; Hans Karbe; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2008-06

4.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Heidi M Schambra; Leonardo G Cohen; Ethan R Buch; Brita Fritsch; Eric Zarahn; Pablo A Celnik; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex.

Authors:  A Karni; G Meyer; C Rey-Hipolito; P Jezzard; M M Adams; R Turner; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Interaction between intracortical inhibition and facilitation in human motor cortex.

Authors:  U Ziemann; J C Rothwell; M C Ridding
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Peter Langhorne; Julie Bernhardt; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study.

Authors:  Tim Wagner; Felipe Fregni; Shirley Fecteau; Alan Grodzinsky; Markus Zahn; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Controversy: Noninvasive and invasive cortical stimulation show efficacy in treating stroke patients.

Authors:  Friedhelm C Hummel; Pablo Celnik; Alvero Pascual-Leone; Felipe Fregni; Winston D Byblow; Cathrin M Buetefisch; John Rothwell; Leonardo G Cohen; Christian Gerloff
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 10.  Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity.

Authors:  Nadia Bolognini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  78 in total

1.  Oral supplementation with L-homoarginine in young volunteers.

Authors:  Dorothee Atzler; Mirjam Schönhoff; Kathrin Cordts; Imke Ortland; Julia Hoppe; Friedhelm C Hummel; Christian Gerloff; Ulrich Jaehde; Annika Jagodzinski; Rainer H Böger; Chi-Un Choe; Edzard Schwedhelm
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy maps cortical plasticity underlying altered motor performance induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Bilal Khan; Timea Hodics; Nathan Hervey; George Kondraske; Ann M Stowe; George Alexandrakis
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Timing-dependent priming effects of tDCS on ankle motor skill learning.

Authors:  Aishwarya Sriraman; Tatsuya Oishi; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates GABA Levels Beyond the Stimulated Region: Perspectives for Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Takahiro Inoue; Kenji Taneda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A combined therapeutic approach in stroke rehabilitation: A review on non-invasive brain stimulation plus pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Carolina Perez; Leon Morales-Quezada; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Int J Neurorehabil       Date:  2014-11-15

6.  The Impact of Shoulder Abduction Loading on Volitional Hand Opening and Grasping in Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke.

Authors:  Yiyun Lan; Jun Yao; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 7.  Biomarkers and predictors of restorative therapy effects after stroke.

Authors:  Erin Burke; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.081

8.  Rethinking stimulation of the brain in stroke rehabilitation: why higher motor areas might be better alternatives for patients with greater impairments.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 7.519

9.  Neural substrates underlying stimulation-enhanced motor skill learning after stroke.

Authors:  Stéphanie Lefebvre; Laurence Dricot; Patrice Laloux; Wojciech Gradkowski; Philippe Desfontaines; Frédéric Evrard; André Peeters; Jacques Jamart; Yves Vandermeeren
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Explicit motor sequence learning after stroke: a neuropsychological study.

Authors:  Cristina Russo; Laura Veronelli; Carlotta Casati; Alessia Monti; Laura Perucca; Francesco Ferraro; Massimo Corbo; Giuseppe Vallar; Nadia Bolognini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.