Literature DB >> 22124031

Optimizing recovery potential through simultaneous occupational therapy and non-invasive brain-stimulation using tDCS.

Dinesh G Nair1, Vijay Renga, Robert Lindenberg, Lin Zhu, Gottfried Schlaug.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is thought that following a stroke the contralesional motor region exerts an undue inhibitory influence on the lesional motor region which might limit recovery. Pilot studies have shown that suppressing the contralesional motor region with cathodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) can induce a short lasting functional benefit; greater and longer lasting effects might be achieved with combining tDCS with simultaneous occupational therapy (OT) and applying this intervention for multiple sessions.
METHODS: We carried out a randomized, double blind, sham controlled study of chronic stroke patients receiving either 5 consecutive days of cathodal tDCS (for 30 minutes) applied to the contralesional motor region and simultaneous OT, or sham tDCS+OT.
RESULTS: we showed that cathodal tDCS+OT resulted in significantly more improvement in Range-Of-Motion in multiple joints of the paretic upper extremity and in the Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer scores than sham tDCS+OT, and that the effects lasted at least one week post-stimulation. Improvement in motor outcome scores was correlated with decrease in fMRI activation in the contralesional motor region exposed to cathodal stimulation.
CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that cathodal tDCS combined with OT leads to significant motor improvement after stroke due to a decrease in the inhibitory effect that the contralesional hemisphere exerts onto the lesional hemisphere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22124031      PMCID: PMC4425274          DOI: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  52 in total

1.  The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke.

Authors:  Heidi Johansen-Berg; Matthew F S Rushworth; Marko D Bogdanovic; Udo Kischka; Sunil Wimalaratna; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability.

Authors:  N Lang; M A Nitsche; W Paulus; J C Rothwell; R N Lemon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex on movement kinematics and neural activity in subcortical stroke.

Authors:  Dennis A Nowak; Christian Grefkes; Manuel Dafotakis; Simon Eickhoff; Jutta Küst; Hans Karbe; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2008-06

4.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Heidi M Schambra; Leonardo G Cohen; Ethan R Buch; Brita Fritsch; Eric Zarahn; Pablo A Celnik; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Transcallosal inhibition in chronic subcortical stroke.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Friedhelm Hummel; Pablo Celnik; Nagako Murase; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Motor cortex excitability in patients with cerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  J Liepert; M Hallett; A Samii; D Oddo; P Celnik; L G Cohen; E M Wassermann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study.

Authors:  Tim Wagner; Felipe Fregni; Shirley Fecteau; Alan Grodzinsky; Markus Zahn; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age?

Authors:  Chris Rorden; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 10.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: a noninvasive tool to facilitate stroke recovery.

Authors:  Gottfried Schlaug; Vijay Renga
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.166

View more
  47 in total

1.  Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado; Corin Bonnett; Daniel Janini; Sarah Roelle; Kelsey Potter-Baker; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Xiaofeng Wang; Guang Yue; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  Noninvasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

3.  Rethinking stimulation of the brain in stroke rehabilitation: why higher motor areas might be better alternatives for patients with greater impairments.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 7.519

Review 4.  Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Pino; Giovanni Pellegrino; Giovanni Assenza; Fioravante Capone; Florinda Ferreri; Domenico Formica; Federico Ranieri; Mario Tombini; Ulf Ziemann; John C Rothwell; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation alters activation and connectivity in cortical and subcortical reward systems: a tDCS-fMRI study.

Authors:  Matthew J Weber; Samuel B Messing; Hengyi Rao; John A Detre; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation improves locomotor learning in healthy humans.

Authors:  Oluwole O Awosika; Marco Sandrini; Rita Volochayev; Ryan M Thompson; Nathan Fishman; Tianxia Wu; Mary Kay Floeter; Mark Hallett; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Analysis of the Factors Related to the Effectiveness of Transcranial Current Stimulation in Upper Limb Motor Function Recovery after Stroke: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  María Antonia Fuentes Calderón; Ainhoa Navarro Miralles; Mauricio Jaramillo Pimienta; Jesús María Gonçalves Estella; María José Sánchez Ledesma
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Temporary deafferentation evoked by cutaneous anesthesia: behavioral and electrophysiological findings in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Aida Sehle; Imke Büsching; Eva Vogt; Joachim Liepert
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Neural substrates underlying stimulation-enhanced motor skill learning after stroke.

Authors:  Stéphanie Lefebvre; Laurence Dricot; Patrice Laloux; Wojciech Gradkowski; Philippe Desfontaines; Frédéric Evrard; André Peeters; Jacques Jamart; Yves Vandermeeren
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 10.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.