Literature DB >> 21825004

Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: an exploratory, randomized multicenter trial.

Stefan Hesse1, Andreas Waldner, Jan Mehrholz, Christopher Tomelleri, Michael Pohl, Cordula Werner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No rehabilitation intervention has effectively improved functional use of the arm and hand in patients with severe upper limb paresis after stroke. Pilot studies suggest the potential for transcranial direct current stimulation and bilateral robotic training to enhance gains.
OBJECTIVE: In a double-blind, randomized trial the combination of these interventions was tested.
METHODS: This study randomized 96 patients with an ischemic supratentorial lesion of 3 to 8 weeks' duration with severe impairment of motor control with a Fugl-Meyer score (FMS) for the upper limb <18 into 3 groups. For 6 weeks, group A received anodal stimulation of the lesioned hemisphere, group B received cathodal stimulation of the nonlesioned side for 20 minutes at 2.0 mA, and group C received sham stimulation. The electrodes were placed over the hand area and above the contralateral orbit. Contemporaneously, the subjects practiced 400 repetitions each of 2 different bilateral movements on a robotic assistive device.
RESULTS: The groups were matched at onset. The FMS improved in all patients at 6 weeks (P < .001). No between-group differences were found; initial versus finish FMS scores were 7.8 ± 3.8 versus 19.1 ± 14.4 in group A, 7.9 ± 3.4 versus 18.8 ± 10.5 in group B, and 8.2 ± 4.4 versus 19.2 ± 15.0 in group C. No significant changes between groups were present at 3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Neither anodal nor cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhanced the effect of bilateral arm training in this exploratory trial of patients with cortical involvement and severe weakness. Unilateral hand training and upregulation of the nonlesioned hemisphere might also be tried in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21825004     DOI: 10.1177/1545968311413906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  77 in total

1.  Inhibition versus facilitation of contralesional motor cortices in stroke: Deriving a model to tailor brain stimulation.

Authors:  Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Andre G Machado; Adriana B Conforto; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; David A Cunningham; Nicole M Varnerin; Xiaofeng Wang; Ken Sakaie; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado; Corin Bonnett; Daniel Janini; Sarah Roelle; Kelsey Potter-Baker; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Xiaofeng Wang; Guang Yue; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Rethinking stimulation of the brain in stroke rehabilitation: why higher motor areas might be better alternatives for patients with greater impairments.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 7.519

Review 4.  Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Pino; Giovanni Pellegrino; Giovanni Assenza; Fioravante Capone; Florinda Ferreri; Domenico Formica; Federico Ranieri; Mario Tombini; Ulf Ziemann; John C Rothwell; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in adults with aphasia after stroke.

Authors:  Bernhard Elsner; Joachim Kugler; Marcus Pohl; Jan Mehrholz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-21

Review 6.  [Brain stimulation for treating stroke-related motor deficits].

Authors:  Caroline Tscherpel; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.214

7.  Analysis of the Factors Related to the Effectiveness of Transcranial Current Stimulation in Upper Limb Motor Function Recovery after Stroke: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  María Antonia Fuentes Calderón; Ainhoa Navarro Miralles; Mauricio Jaramillo Pimienta; Jesús María Gonçalves Estella; María José Sánchez Ledesma
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 8.  Early Rehabilitation After Stroke: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Elisheva R Coleman; Rohitha Moudgal; Kathryn Lang; Hyacinth I Hyacinth; Oluwole O Awosika; Brett M Kissela; Wuwei Feng
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 9.  Neurorestoration after stroke.

Authors:  Tej D Azad; Anand Veeravagu; Gary K Steinberg
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 10.  New evidence for therapies in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; Andrew Dorsch
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.