S R Nodzo1, C-C Chang2, K M Carroll3, B T Barlow4, S A Banks5, D E Padgett3, D J Mayman3, S A Jerabek3. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Mike O'Callaghan Medical Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. 2. Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. 3. Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA. 4. San Diego Naval Medical Center, San Diego, California, USA. 5. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of implant placement when using robotic assistance during total hip arthroplasty (THA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 20 patients underwent a planned THA using preoperative CT scans and robotic-assisted software. There were nine men and 11 women (n = 20 hips) with a mean age of 60.8 years (sd 6.0). Pelvic and femoral bone models were constructed by segmenting both preoperative and postoperative CT scan images. The preoperative anatomical landmarks using the robotic-assisted system were matched to the postoperative 3D reconstructions of the pelvis. Acetabular and femoral component positions as measured intraoperatively and postoperatively were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The system reported accurate values for reconstruction of the hip when compared to those measured postoperatively using CT. The mean deviation from the executed overall hip length and offset were 1.6 mm (sd 2.9) and 0.5 mm (sd 3.0), respectively. Mean combined anteversion was similar and correlated between intraoperative measurements and postoperative CT measurements (32.5°, sd 5.9° versus 32.2°, sd 6.4°; respectively; R2 = 0.65; p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between mean intraoperative (40.4°, sd 2.1°) acetabular component inclination and mean measured postoperative inclination (40.12°, sd 3.0°, R2 = 0.62; p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between mean intraoperative version (23.2°, sd 2.3°), and postoperatively measured version (23.0°, sd 2.4°; R2 = 0.76; p < 0.001). Preoperative and postoperative femoral component anteversion were significantly correlated with one another (R2 = 0.64; p < 0.001). Three patients had CT scan measurements that differed substantially from the intraoperative robotic measurements when evaluating stem anteversion. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the success of hip reconstruction overall using robotic-assisted THA. The overall hip reconstruction obtained in the operating theatre using robotic assistance accurately correlated with the postoperative component position assessed independently using CT based 3D modelling. Clinical correlation during surgery should continue to be practiced and compared with observed intraoperative robotic values. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1303-9.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of implant placement when using robotic assistance during total hip arthroplasty (THA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 20 patients underwent a planned THA using preoperative CT scans and robotic-assisted software. There were nine men and 11 women (n = 20 hips) with a mean age of 60.8 years (sd 6.0). Pelvic and femoral bone models were constructed by segmenting both preoperative and postoperative CT scan images. The preoperative anatomical landmarks using the robotic-assisted system were matched to the postoperative 3D reconstructions of the pelvis. Acetabular and femoral component positions as measured intraoperatively and postoperatively were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The system reported accurate values for reconstruction of the hip when compared to those measured postoperatively using CT. The mean deviation from the executed overall hip length and offset were 1.6 mm (sd 2.9) and 0.5 mm (sd 3.0), respectively. Mean combined anteversion was similar and correlated between intraoperative measurements and postoperative CT measurements (32.5°, sd 5.9° versus 32.2°, sd 6.4°; respectively; R2 = 0.65; p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between mean intraoperative (40.4°, sd 2.1°) acetabular component inclination and mean measured postoperative inclination (40.12°, sd 3.0°, R2 = 0.62; p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between mean intraoperative version (23.2°, sd 2.3°), and postoperatively measured version (23.0°, sd 2.4°; R2 = 0.76; p < 0.001). Preoperative and postoperative femoral component anteversion were significantly correlated with one another (R2 = 0.64; p < 0.001). Three patients had CT scan measurements that differed substantially from the intraoperative robotic measurements when evaluating stem anteversion. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the success of hip reconstruction overall using robotic-assisted THA. The overall hip reconstruction obtained in the operating theatre using robotic assistance accurately correlated with the postoperative component position assessed independently using CT based 3D modelling. Clinical correlation during surgery should continue to be practiced and compared with observed intraoperative robotic values. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1303-9.
Authors: Gary Tran; Lafi S Khalil; Allen Wrubel; Chad L Klochko; Jason J Davis; Steven B Soliman Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Steven B Soliman; Jason J Davis; Stephanie J Muh; Saifuddin T Vohra; Ashish Patel; Marnix T van Holsbeeck Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2022-05-28 Impact factor: 2.128