Literature DB >> 34651471

[Robot-assisted joint arthroplasty-An emerging technology of the present and the future].

Jun Fu1,2,3, Ming Ni1,2,3, Jiying Chen1,2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review and evaluate the research progress of the robot-assisted joint arthroplasty.
METHODS: The domestic and foreign related research literature on robot-assisted joint arthroplasty was extensively consulted. The advantages, disadvantages, effectiveness, and future prospects were mainly reviewed and summarized.
RESULTS: The widely recognized advantages of robot-assisted joint arthroplasty are digital and intelligent preoperative planning, accurate intraoperative prosthesis implantation, and quantitative soft tissue balance, as well as good postoperative imaging prosthesis position and alignment. However, the advantages of effectiveness are still controversial. The main disadvantages of robot-assisted joint arthroplasty are the high price of the robot system, the prolonged operation time, and the increased radioactive damage of the imaging-dependent system.
CONCLUSION: Compared to traditional arthroplasty, robot-assisted joint arthroplasty can improve the accuracy of the prosthesis position and assist in the quantitative assessment of soft tissue tension, and the repeatability rate is high. In the future, further research is needed to evaluate the clinical function and survival rate of the prosthesis, as well as to optimize the robot system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robot-assisted surgery; artificial intelligence; joint replacement; precision surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34651471      PMCID: PMC8505951          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202106086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  21 in total

1.  Accuracy of Component Positioning in 1980 Total Hip Arthroplasties: A Comparative Analysis by Surgical Technique and Mode of Guidance.

Authors:  Benjamin G Domb; John M Redmond; Steven S Louis; Kris J Alden; Robert J Daley; Justin M LaReau; Alexandra E Petrakos; Chengcheng Gui; Carlos Suarez-Ahedo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Improved implant position and lower revision rate with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Cécile Batailler; Nathan White; Filippo Maria Ranaldi; Philippe Neyret; Elvire Servien; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Haptically guided robotic technology in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric investigation.

Authors:  Danyal H Nawabi; Michael A Conditt; Amar S Ranawat; Nicholas J Dunbar; Jennifer Jones; Scott Banks; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.617

4.  The learning curve associated with robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  John M Redmond; Asheesh Gupta; Jon E Hammarstedt; Alexandra E Petrakos; Nathan A Finch; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 5.  Robotics in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  David J Jacofsky; Mark Allen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 6.  Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery: Past, present and future.

Authors:  Frederic Picard; Angela Helen Deakin; Philip E Riches; Kamal Deep; Joseph Baines
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nikhil Agarwal; Kendrick To; Stephen McDonnell; Wasim Khan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Improved mediolateral load distribution without adverse laxity pattern in robot-assisted knee arthroplasty compared to a standard manual measured resection technique.

Authors:  William Manning; Milton Ghosh; Ian Wilson; Geoff Hide; Lee Longstaff; David Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Does Robotic-assisted TKA Result in Better Outcome Scores or Long-Term Survivorship Than Conventional TKA? A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Sung-Hwan Yoon; Jang-Won Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning.

Authors:  Babar Kayani; S Konan; S S Huq; J Tahmassebi; F S Haddad
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.