Literature DB >> 33140168

Incidental findings detected on preoperative CT imaging obtained for robotic-assisted joint replacements: clinical importance and the effect on the scheduled arthroplasty.

Gary Tran1, Lafi S Khalil2, Allen Wrubel1, Chad L Klochko1, Jason J Davis2, Steven B Soliman3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the type and frequency of incidental findings detected on preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging obtained for robotic-assisted joint replacements and their effect on the planned arthroplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All preoperative CT examinations performed for a robotic-assisted knee or total hip arthroplasty were obtained. This resulted in 1432 examinations performed between September 2016 and February 2020 at our institution. These examinations were initially interpreted by 1 of 9 fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists. Using a diagnosis search, the examination reports were then reviewed to catalog all incidental findings and further classify as significant or non-significant findings. Demographic information was obtained. In those with significant findings, a chart review was performed to record the relevant workup, outcomes, and if the planned arthroplasty was affected.
RESULTS: Incidental findings were diagnosed in 740 (51.7%) patients. Of those with incidental findings, 41 (5.5%) were considered significant. A significant finding was more likely to be detected in males (P = 0.007) and on the hip protocol CT (P = 0.014). In 8 patients, these diagnoses resulted in either delay or cancelation of the arthroplasty. A planned total hip arthroplasty was more likely to be altered as compared to a knee arthroplasty (P = 0.018).
CONCLUSION: Incidental findings are commonly detected by radiologists on preoperative CT imaging obtained for robotic-assisted joint replacement. Several were valuable findings and resulted in a delay or even cancelation of the planned arthroplasty after the detection of critical diagnoses, which if not identified may have resulted in devastating outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT imaging; Incidental findings; Joint replacement; Knee arthroplasty; Robotic assisted; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33140168     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03660-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  45 in total

1.  Predictors of Patient Satisfaction Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results from a Traditional Statistical Model and a Machine Learning Algorithm.

Authors:  Hassan Farooq; Evan R Deckard; Mary Ziemba-Davis; Adam Madsen; R Michael Meneghini
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  [Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Analysis of Pre-Operative and Peri-Operative Parameters Influencing Results in 826 Patients].

Authors:  J Lošťák; J Gallo; J Zapletalová
Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.531

3.  Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With Metasul Bearings Provides Good Results in Active Young Patients: A Concise Followup.

Authors:  Christian P Delaunay; Sophie Putman; Benjamin Puliéro; Matthieu Bégin; Henri Migaud; François Bonnomet
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  How Much Does a Readmission Cost the Bundle Following Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jessica L H Phillips; Alexander J Rondon; Chris Vannello; Yale A Fillingham; Matthew S Austin; P Maxwell Courtney
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Three groups of dissatisfied patients exist after total knee arthroplasty: early, persistent, and late.

Authors:  N D Clement; M Bardgett; D Weir; J Holland; C Gerrand; D J Deehan
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Which Clinical and Patient Factors Influence the National Economic Burden of Hospital Readmissions After Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Edmund C Lau; Kevin L Ong; Edward M Adler; Frank R Kolisek; Michael T Manley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Lim; Seung-Pil Jang; Dong-Wook Kim; Young-Wan Moon; Youn-Soo Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Prevalence of knee and hip osteoarthritis and the appropriateness of joint replacement in an older population.

Authors:  José M Quintana; Inmaculada Arostegui; Antonio Escobar; Jesus Azkarate; J Ignacio Goenaga; Iratxe Lafuente
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-28

Review 9.  Indication criteria for total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: a state-of-the-science overview.

Authors:  Maaike G J Gademan; Stefanie N Hofstede; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Rob G H H Nelissen; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Patients with metabolic syndrome have a greater rate of complications after arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cui Guofeng; Yue Chen; Wei Rong; Liu Ruiyu; Wang Kunzheng
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.853

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound evaluations and guided procedures of the painful joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Steven B Soliman; Jason J Davis; Stephanie J Muh; Saifuddin T Vohra; Ashish Patel; Marnix T van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 2.128

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.