Literature DB >> 34651475

[Early effectiveness of robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty via direct superior approach].

Ji Zhang1, Xingshan Wang1, Dejin Yang1, Yixin Zhou1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early effectiveness of the robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) via direct superior approach (DSA).
METHODS: Between March 2021 and April 2021, 11 patients (11 hips) were treated with a robot-assisted THA via DSA. There were 7 males and 4 females, with an average age of 55 years (range, 26-73 years). There were 5 patients of osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia and 6 patients of osteonecrosis of femoral head. Preoperative hip Harris score was 55.8±6.3. The operation time, volume of blood loss, length of incision, postoperative blood transfusion and hospital stay, and the incidence of surgical complications were recorded. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Harris score were used to evaluate hip joint pain and function. The leg length discrepancy (LLD) was measured on the X-ray films. The inclination angle and anteversion angle of the acetabular component were also measured, and the difference between the planned and actual values were compared.
RESULTS: One THA was performed via conventional posterolateral approach finally because of poor exposure. The rest of 10 THAs were performed with assistance of robotic arm via DSA. The average operation time was 89 minutes (range, 65-120 minutes); the average length of incision was 10.5 cm (range, 9-13 cm); and the average blood loss was 400 mL (range, 110-740 mL). One patient was given a blood transfusion for 2 unit. All incisions healed by first intention and no neurovascular injury, deep vein thrombosis, or fracture occurred. The length of hospital stay after operation was 2-6 days (mean, 4.4 days). The duration of follow-up was 1-3 months (mean, 2.1 months). The VAS score was 0 in 9 patients and 2 in 1 patient at the day of discharge. At last follow-up, the hip Harris score was 84.9±6.7, showing significant difference when compared with that before operation ( t=-8.717, P=0.000). The inclination and anteversion angles were (37.4±2.0)° and (17.1±4.5)°, respectively, and there was no significant difference when compared with the planned values [(38.2±1.6)°, (16.6±3.7)°] ( t=1.809, P=0.104; t=-1.103, P=0.299). The LLD ranged from -2 to 4 mm. No complication such as dislocation, aseptic loosening, or periprosthetic joint infection occurred.
CONCLUSION: The robot-assisted THA via DSA has encouraged early effectiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mako robot; Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty; direct superior approach; minimally invasive surgery; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34651475      PMCID: PMC8505947          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202105115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  18 in total

1.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using a transpiriformis approach: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Douglas J Roger; David Hill
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Accuracy of Component Positioning in 1980 Total Hip Arthroplasties: A Comparative Analysis by Surgical Technique and Mode of Guidance.

Authors:  Benjamin G Domb; John M Redmond; Steven S Louis; Kris J Alden; Robert J Daley; Justin M LaReau; Alexandra E Petrakos; Chengcheng Gui; Carlos Suarez-Ahedo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Comparison of Early Functional Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Direct Anterior or Posterolateral Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Zhao; Peng-De Kang; Ya-Yi Xia; Xiao-Jun Shi; Yong Nie; Fu-Xing Pei
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Estimating allowable hemodilution.

Authors:  D L Bourke; T C Smith
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Learning Curve for the Direct Superior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rami M Ezzibdeh; Andrew A Barrett; Prerna Arora; Derek F Amanatullah
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 1.390

6.  Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  William P Barrett; Shelly E Turner; John P Leopold
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Robotic-Assisted versus Manually Implanted Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiographic Comparison.

Authors:  Christopher J Hadley; Eric L Grossman; Michael A Mont; Hytham S Salem; Fabio Catani; Andrea Marcovigi
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2020-06-10

8.  The Mako ™ robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach: surgical technique, skills and pitfals.

Authors:  Piergiuseppe Perazzini; Michele Trevisan; Paolo Sembenini; Francesco Alberton; Mara Laterza; Alberto Marangon; Bruno Magnan
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-05-30

9.  No Learning Curve of the Direct Superior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bouke J Duijnisveld; Joost A A M van den Hout; Robert Wagenmakers; Koen L M Koenraadt; Stefan B T Bolder
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.071

10.  Direct anterior versus mini-anterolateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: early postoperative outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Carl L Herndon; Nathan Drummond; Nana O Sarpong; H John Cooper; Roshan P Shah; Jeffrey A Geller
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.