Literature DB >> 34651474

[Application of Mako robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty in developmental dysplasia of the hip].

Gujun Xu1,2, Mingyang Ma1,3,4, Shuai Zhang1,3,4, Yubo Liu1,3,5, Xiangpeng Kong1,3, Wei Chai1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early effectiveness and summarize the initial application experiences of Mako robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in adults.
METHODS: Between August 2018 and January 2020, 55 cases of DDH (75 hips) were treated with Mako robot-assisted THA. There were 10 males and 45 females with an average age of 51 years (range, 30-73 years). There were 35 cases of unilateral hip and 20 cases of bilateral hips. The DDH was classified as Crowe type Ⅰin 29 hips, type Ⅱ in 20 hips, type Ⅲ in 6 hips, and type Ⅳ in 20 hips. The modified Harris score was 54.8±16.0, the hip joint range of motion was 90° (80°, 100°), and the leg length discrepancy (LLD) was 22.0 (10.5, 47.0) mm. The preoperative surgical plan was made in the robot system based on the CT data. The reaming and installation of the acetabular cup were completed with the assistance of the robot system. The distance between the rotation center of the hip joint and the teardrop (horizontal distance, vertical distance), inclination angle, and anteversion angle were measured on the pelvic X-ray film to evaluate the position of the acetabular prosthesis. The above indicators were compared with preoperative planning to evaluate the accuracy of robotic-assisted surgery. The modified Harris score, the range of motion, and the LLD were used to evaluate the early effectiveness.
RESULTS: The 75 hips of THAs were completed with the assistance of Mako robots. There was no significant difference in the acetabular inclination angle, the horizontal distance and the vertical distance of the rotation center between the preoperative planning and the postoperative measurement values ( P>0.05); the acetabular anteversion angle was significantly smaller than the postoperative measurement value ( t=-2.482, P=0.015). Four hips located beyond the Lewinnek safety zone, and 71 hips located within the Lewinnek safety zone. All patients followed up 6-24 months (mean, 13 months). All incisions healed by first intention. At last follow-up, the modified Harris score was 85.5±11.2, the hip joint range of motion was 120° (110°, 120°), and the LLD was 3.8 (2.0, 8.1) mm; all improved significantly compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05). Except for one nerve injury case, there was no other complication.
CONCLUSION: Mako robot-assisted THA is a safe and effective method for adult DDH, which can optimize the acetabular cup positioning, hip function, and leg length, but the long-term effectiveness needs to be confirmed by further studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mako robot; Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty; adult; developmental dysplasia of the hip

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34651474      PMCID: PMC8505946          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202105013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  24 in total

1.  Accuracy of Component Positioning in 1980 Total Hip Arthroplasties: A Comparative Analysis by Surgical Technique and Mode of Guidance.

Authors:  Benjamin G Domb; John M Redmond; Steven S Louis; Kris J Alden; Robert J Daley; Justin M LaReau; Alexandra E Petrakos; Chengcheng Gui; Carlos Suarez-Ahedo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty using the MAKO platform.

Authors:  Rupesh Tarwala; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-09

3.  Precision of robotic guided instrumentation for acetabular component positioning.

Authors:  Vaibhav Kanawade; Lawrence D Dorr; Scott A Banks; Zenan Zhang; Zhinian Wan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Predictive value of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Youssef F El Bitar; Timothy J Jackson; Dror Lindner; Itamar B Botser; Christine E Stake; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.390

5.  A retrospective study comparing a single surgeon's experience on manual versus robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty after the learning curve of the latter procedure - A cohort study.

Authors:  Xiangpeng Kong; Minzhi Yang; Seth Jerabek; Guoqiang Zhang; Jiying Chen; Wei Chai
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 6.071

6.  Short-term Clinical Outcomes of Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Pair-Matched Controlled Study.

Authors:  Itay Perets; John P Walsh; Brian H Mu; YosIf Mansor; Philip J Rosinsky; David R Maldonado; Ajay C Lall; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 7.  Reconstruction of the Acetabulum in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Vasileios I Sakellariou; Michael Christodoulou; Gregory Sasalos; George C Babis
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-09-15

Review 8.  Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component.

Authors:  R Biedermann; A Tonin; M Krismer; F Rachbauer; G Eibl; B Stöckl
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-06

9.  Intraoperative placement of total hip arthroplasty components with robotic-arm assisted technology correlates with postoperative implant position: a CT-based study.

Authors:  S R Nodzo; C-C Chang; K M Carroll; B T Barlow; S A Banks; D E Padgett; D J Mayman; S A Jerabek
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 10.  The current role of robotics in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Babar Kayani; Sujith Konan; Atif Ayuob; Salamah Ayyad; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2019-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.