Literature DB >> 30276449

Long-term survivorship of a monoblock long cementless stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Yannick Herry1, Anthony Viste2,3,4,5, Hugo Bothorel6, Romain Desmarchelier1,7,8,9, Michel-Henri Fessy1,7,8,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes, complications, and survival of a long cementless titanium femoral stem in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) at a minimum five year follow-up.
METHODS: Between 2000 and 2010, 114 patients (116 hips), with a mean age of 68 ± 12 years, underwent revision THA using a KAR® stem (DePuy, Leeds, UK). The main reasons for revision were aseptic loosening (82%), periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) (11%), and periprosthetic fractures (6%). Mean follow-up was ten ± three years (range, 5-16). Harris Hip Score (HHS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), and Postel-Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) score were recorded. Radiographic analysis assessed stem osseointegration and subsidence. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and cumulative incidence function (CIF).
RESULTS: Post-operative HHS was 83 ± 15 (range, 35-99) and OHS was 37 ± 8 (range, 8-48). PMA score significantly increased from 12 ± 2 (range, 5-18) pre-operatively to 14.6 ± 2 (range, 9-18) post-operatively (p = 0.0004). The radiographic Engh score was 15 ± 8 (range, 7-22). Stem subsidence was observed in two cases (3%). At ten years, five stems had been revised, three for infections and two for periprosthetic fractures. Using the KM method, ten year survival free of stem revision for aseptic loosening was 100%, free of revision for any reason 95%, and free of any re-operation 81%.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study reported satisfactory outcomes and survival of a long tapered unlocked cementless femoral stem in revision THA at a minimum follow-up of five years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Long tapered uncemented stem; Revision; Survival; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30276449     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4186-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  29 in total

1.  Cemented first-time revisions of the femoral component: prospective 7 to 13 years' follow-up using second-generation and third-generation technique.

Authors:  P Hultmark; J Kärrholm; C Strömberg; P Herberts; C H Möse; H Malchau
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification.

Authors:  Craig J Della Valle; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Distal locking stem for revision femoral loosening and peri-prosthetic fractures.

Authors:  Patrice Mertl; Remy Philippot; Philippe Rosset; Henri Migaud; Jacques Tabutin; Denis Van de Velde
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Competing events influence estimated survival probability: when is Kaplan-Meier analysis appropriate?

Authors:  David Jean Biau; Aurélien Latouche; Raphaël Porcher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Are short fully coated stems adequate for "simple" femoral revisions?

Authors:  Matthew W Tetreault; Sanjai K Shukla; Paul H Yi; Scott M Sporer; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maik Hoberg; Christian Konrads; Jana Engelien; Dorothee Oschmann; Michael Holder; Matthias Walcher; Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery.

Authors:  Monti Khatod; Guy Cafri; Maria C S Inacio; Alan L Schepps; Elizabeth W Paxton; Stefano A Bini
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Twenty-year results of the cementless Corail stem.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Vidalain
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jang-Won Park; Jun-Shik Kim; Devarshi Rastogi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Global radiological score for femoral cementless revision stem.

Authors:  François Canovas; Sophie Putman; Julien Girard; Olivier Roche; François Bonnomet; Pierre Le Béguec
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  3 in total

1.  Incidence and pattern of periprosthetic hip fractures around the stem in different stem geometry.

Authors:  Umberto Cottino; Federico Dettoni; Giorgia Caputo; Davide E Bonasia; Paolo Rossi; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Minimum ten-year results in revision total hip arthroplasty using titanium fully porous long stem.

Authors:  Masahiro Hasegawa; Shine Tone; Yohei Naito; Hiroki Wakabayashi; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Strategies for stem revision : Surgery planning, implant removal and reimplantation].

Authors:  Sebastian Hardt; Lukas Schönnagel; Christian Hipfl
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-07-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.