Literature DB >> 33825004

Minimum ten-year results in revision total hip arthroplasty using titanium fully porous long stem.

Masahiro Hasegawa1, Shine Tone2, Yohei Naito2, Hiroki Wakabayashi2, Akihiro Sudo2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The fully porous long stem could be used for diaphyseal locking and achieve bypass fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study evaluated long-term results for fully porous long stems made of titanium alloy in revision THA.
METHODS: Between 2003 and 2010, 45 consecutive femoral revisions were performed using fully porous long stems. Thirty-eight hips had complete clinical and radiographic data for a mean of 13.8 years (range, 10-16.7 years). Femoral bone loss was Paprosky type II in 14 hips, type IIIA in 18 hips, and type IIIB in six hips. Clinical results were analyzed using the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel scoring system. Femoral stress shielding was graded. Radiological loosening of the femoral component was evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed with revision for any reason as the end-point.
RESULTS: Mean Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score improved significantly from 10.7 before revision to 14.5 at latest follow-up (p < 0.001). Third-degree stress shielding was found in seven hips, and fourth degree in 11 hips. Radiological femoral loosening occurred in one hip, which was revised. Another hip was revised for stem fracture. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rate was 94.7% at both ten and 15 years.
CONCLUSION: Although stress shielding is a concern with fully porous stems, this stem was useful in revision THA and provided satisfactory long-term results in hips with Paprosky types II, IIIA, and IIIB.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cementless; Fully porous stem; Long-term results; Revision; Total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 33825004     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05030-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  29 in total

1.  Long-term survivorship of a monoblock long cementless stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yannick Herry; Anthony Viste; Hugo Bothorel; Romain Desmarchelier; Michel-Henri Fessy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Classifications In Brief: The Paprosky Classification of Femoral Bone Loss.

Authors:  David A Ibrahim; Navin D Fernando
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Extended trochanteric osteotomy: current concepts review.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Gopinath Duraisamy; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Varatharaj Mounasamy
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-02-29

4.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results.

Authors:  C A Engh; J D Bobyn; A H Glassman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-01

5.  Proximal femoral replacement in non-oncologic patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ivan De Martino; Rocco D'Apolito; Allina A Nocon; Thomas P Sculco; Peter K Sculco; Mathias P Bostrom
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Femoral impaction allografting for significant bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas A J Goff; Peter Bobak
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: reliable choice for stem revision in Paprosky femoral type III defects.

Authors:  Lien-Hsiang Chung; Po-Kuei Wu; Cheng-Fong Chen; Wei-Ming Chen; Tain-Hsiung Chen; Chien-Lin Liu
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 1.390

8.  Contemporary Surgical Indications and Referral Trends in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 10-Year Review.

Authors:  Jacob A Haynes; Jeffrey B Stambough; Adam A Sassoon; Staci R Johnson; John C Clohisy; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  A modular cementless stem vs. cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip: a population-based study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Weiss; André Stark; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Uncemented or cemented revision stems? Analysis of 2,296 first-time hip revision arthroplasties performed due to aseptic loosening, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Yosef Tyson; Ola Rolfson; Johan Kärrholm; Nils P Hailer; Maziar Mohaddes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  2 in total

1.  Microstructural Origins of the Corrosion Resistance of a Mg-Y-Nd-Zr Alloy Processed by Powder Bed Fusion - Laser Beam.

Authors:  Hanna Nilsson Åhman; Francesco D'Elia; Pelle Mellin; Cecilia Persson
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-01

2.  Novel Design of the Compound Sleeve and Stem Prosthesis for Treatment of Proximal Femur Bone Defects Based on Topology Optimization.

Authors:  Haowen Xue; Haotian Bai; Rongqi Zhou; Jincheng Wang; Bin Zhou; Xiaonan Wang; Wenbin Luo; Xin Zhao
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.