Literature DB >> 26013152

High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.

Young-Hoo Kim1, Jang-Won Park, Jun-Shik Kim, Devarshi Rastogi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have investigated the clinical and radiographic results of revision THAs with use of cementless stems and cortical strut allografts. However, to our knowledge, no long-term followup studies have evaluated patients undergoing revision THA with use of cortical strut allografts where the allografts provided the primary stability for extensively coated femoral stems in the presence of extensive femoral diaphyseal bone defects. QUESTION/PURPOSES: We performed this study to determine (1) validated outcomes scores; (2) radiographic signs of fixation and allograft healing; (3) frequency of complications; and (4) survivorship of the components after use of cortical strut onlay allografts in Types IIIB and IV femoral diaphyseal bone defects.
METHODS: Between 1994 and 2003, we performed 140 revision THAs in 130 patients with Paprosky Types IIIB and IV femoral diaphyseal defects. The patients were treated using extensively coated femoral stems and cortical strut allografts because primary axial or rotational stability could not be achieved without grafting. Ten of the patients (10 hips; 7.7%) were lost to followup or died before 10 years; the remaining 120 patients (130 hips) represent the study group in this retrospective study. There were 66 men and 54 women. Their mean age at the time of index surgery was 59 ± 18 years (range, 36-67 years). The primary diagnosis was predominantly osteonecrosis of the femoral head (53%). The most common reason for revision was aseptic loosening (97%), followed by periprosthetic fracture (3%). The mean time from primary to revision THA was 12 years (range, 8-27 years). The mean duration of followup was 16.1 years (range, 12-20 years).
RESULTS: The mean Harris hip score was 39 ± 10 points before revision and improved to 86 ± 14 points at 16 years followup (p = 0.02). The mean preoperative WOMAC score was 62 ± 29 (41-91) points and improved to 22 ± 19 (11-51) points at 16 years followup (p = 0.003). Of the 130 stems, 113 (87%) had bone ingrowth, five (4%) had stable fibrous ingrowth, and 12 (9%) were unstable. All allografts were incorporated. Four hips (3%) had a displaced femoral shaft fracture at the stem tip; four (3%) had a postoperative dislocation; and six (5%) had early postoperative infection. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis, with revision or radiographic failure as the endpoint, revealed that the 16-year rate of survival of the components was 91% (95% CI, 0.88%-0.96%).
CONCLUSION: Supportive cortical strut onlay allografts provided high survivorship beyond 12 years of followup in revision THAs. Future studies might compare this approach with allograft-prosthesis composites, proximal femoral replacement, or modular fluted, tapered stems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26013152      PMCID: PMC4523544          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4358-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  32 in total

1.  The use of structural allografts for treating periprosthetic fractures about the hip and knee.

Authors:  P Wong; A E Gross
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 2.  Periprosthetic fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty: treatment and results to date.

Authors:  D G Lewallen; D J Berry
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1998

3.  Revision total hip arthroplasty: the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Robert L Barrack; J Thomas McClure; Corey F Burak; John C Clohisy; Javad Parvizi; William Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Cementless revision of total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic porous replacement revision prosthesis.

Authors:  A M Buoncristiani; L D Dorr; C Johnson; Z Wan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 5.  Fractures of the femur after hip replacement.

Authors:  C P Duncan; B A Masri
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1995

6.  Impaction bone grafting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty with Exeter Universal stem in Japan.

Authors:  Toshiki Iwase; Hiromi Otsuka; Naoyuki Katayama; Hiroshi Fujita
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jun-Shik Kim
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Proximal femoral allograft-prosthesis composites in revision hip replacement: a 12-year follow-up study.

Authors:  G C Babis; V I Sakellariou; M I O'Connor; A D Hanssen; F H Sim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-03

9.  Use of an 'internal proximal femoral replacement' with distal fixation in revision arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  P K Jaiswal; J Jagiello; L A David; G Blunn; R W J Carrington; J A Skinner; S R Cannon; T W R Briggs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-01

10.  Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant.

Authors:  Matthias D Wimmer; Thomas M Randau; Moritz C Deml; Rudolf Ascherl; Ulrich Nöth; Raimund Forst; Nadine Gravius; Dieter Wirtz; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  11 in total

1.  Long-term survivorship of a monoblock long cementless stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yannick Herry; Anthony Viste; Hugo Bothorel; Romain Desmarchelier; Michel-Henri Fessy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Luca Cavagnaro; Matteo Formica; Marco Basso; Andrea Zanirato; Stefano Divano; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-07-01

3.  Onlay fibula autografting technique and its comparison with cortical allograft for the reconstruction of periprosthetic bone defects around the femur.

Authors:  İbrahim Tuncay; Remzi Tözün; Orkhan Aliyev; Göksel Dikmen; Gökçer Uzer; Vahit Emre Özden; Fatih Yıldız
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Minimum ten-year results in revision total hip arthroplasty using titanium fully porous long stem.

Authors:  Masahiro Hasegawa; Shine Tone; Yohei Naito; Hiroki Wakabayashi; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Reconstructed the bone stock after femoral bone loss in Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures using cortical strut allograft and impacted cancellous allograft.

Authors:  Donghai Li; Qinsheng Hu; Pengde Kang; Jing Yang; Zongke Zhou; Bin Shen; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The Biological Metallic versus Metallic Solution in Treating Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Outcome Assessment.

Authors:  Serafino Carta; Mattia Fortina; Alberto Riva; Luigi Meccariello; Enrico Manzi; Antonio Di Giovanni; Paolo Ferrata
Journal:  Adv Med       Date:  2016-11-20

Review 7.  Biodegradable Polymers as Drug Delivery Systems for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Kaoru Aoki; Naoto Saito
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 6.321

8.  Cortical strut allografts in salvage revision arthroplasty: Surgical technique and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Hosam E Matar; Veenesh Selvaratnam; Mikhil Jain; Tim N Board; Nikhil Shah
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-02-04

9.  Minimum 8-year follow-up of revision THA with severe femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems and cortical strut allografts.

Authors:  Zi-Chuan Ding; Ting-Xian Ling; Ming-Cheng Yuan; Yong-Zhi Qin; Ping Mou; Hao-Yang Wang; Zong-Ke Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Bone restoration after revision hip arthroplasty with femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems with cortical strut allografts.

Authors:  Zichuan Ding; Tingxian Ling; Ping Mou; Duan Wang; Kai Zhou; Zongke Zhou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.