Literature DB >> 30276091

Readmissions After Outpatient Transforaminal Decompression for Lumbar Foraminal and Lateral Recess Stenosis.

Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze readmission rates after outpatient transforaminal endoscopic decompression surgery for lumbar foraminal and lateral recess stenosis done in an ambulatory surgery center. Endoscopic lumbar spinal surgery is gaining popularity for the treatment of lumbar disc herniations. Recent advances in surgical techniques allow for percutaneous endoscopically assisted bony decompression for neurogenic claudication symptoms due to spinal stenosis. The surgery can be done under local anesthesia and sedation. Patients may be discharged home within hours from surgery, and complications are rare. However, readmissions for recurrent disc herniations, failure of pain relief, dysesthetic leg pain, nerve root injuries with foot drop, and facet and pedicle fractures have been reported.
METHODS: A retrospective study of 1839 consecutive patients with an average mean follow up of 33 months (range 24 to 85 months) that underwent percutaneous endoscopic surgery at 2076 levels between 2006 and 2015 was conducted with the intent of identifying factors associated with emergency room or hospital readmission following endoscopic foraminotomy and microdiscectomy. Only patients with unilateral radiculopathy due to either herniated disc or lateral recess stenosis were included in this study. Preoperatively, disc migration was graded by direction and distance from the disc space according to Lee's radiologic 4-zone classification. The type of disc herniation was classified either as extruded or contained. Contained herniations were further subclassified as disc protrusions versus disc bulges. In addition, the preoperative disc height was recorded. Bony spinal foraminal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis were graded on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans into mild, moderate, and severe by dividing the lumbar neuroforamen into 3 zones: (a) entry zone, (b) midzone, and (c) exit zone. Surgical outcomes were classified according to the Macnab criteria. In addition, reduction in visual analog scores (VASs) were assessed. The treating physician (KUL) performed all surgeries.
RESULTS: According to the Macnab criteria, excellent and good results were obtained in 82.2% of patients with extruded disc fragment (331/1839). In this group, the mean VAS decreased from 5.9 ± 2.5 preoperatively to 2.4 ± 1.8 at the final follow up (P < .01). Patients with contained disc herniations (648/1839) had excellent and good results 72.7% of the time. In this group, the mean VAS decreased from 7.2 ± 1.6 preoperatively to 3.1 ± 1.5 at the final follow up (P < .01). In the spinal stenosis group (860/1839), 75% of patients had excellent to good results. There were no major approach-related complications. Sixty-nine patients had extravasations of irrigation fluid into the subcutaneous tissues (3.8%). Eight patients developed spinal headaches (0.4%). Two patients developed foot drop on the surgical side immediately postoperatively (0.1%). Reherniations of extruded discs occurred in 9 patients (2.7% recurrence rate). Failure of pain relief without significant improvement of walking endurance occurred in 29 patients with bony stenosis in the central canal, lateral recess, and entry zone of the neuroforamen (3.3%). Reherniations were associated with preserved disc height of >6 mm (P < .02). Dysesthetic leg pain due to dorsal root ganglion irritation occurred in 229 patients (12.4%) and was unrelated to case frequency but was associated with severe foraminal stenosis (P < .01). All 229 patients improved with supportive care. Facet or pedicle fractures did not occur in this series. There were 26 acute care (within 6 weeks from surgery) postoperative emergency room visits [16 of which resulted in readmission to a hospital over the 9-year study period (0.86%): 9 for dysesthetic leg pain, 2 for wound infections, and 5 for poorly controlled incisional pain].
CONCLUSIONS: Transforaminal endoscopic decompression can be successfully carried out in an outpatient surgery center setting. Readmissions due to reherniations, postoperative complications, or poor pain control are uncommon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; lumbar endoscopic decompression; readmissions

Year:  2018        PMID: 30276091      PMCID: PMC6159758          DOI: 10.14444/5040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  41 in total

Review 1.  Lumbar spinal stenosis. Treatment strategies and indications for surgery.

Authors:  Dilip K Sengupta; Harry N Herkowitz
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 2.  Advances in endoscopic disc and spine surgery: foraminal approach.

Authors:  Anthony T Yeung; Christopher A Yeung
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2003

3.  Ambulatory microsurgery for ruptured lumbar discs: report of ten cases.

Authors:  H L Cares; R S Steinberg; E T Robertson; P Caldini
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 4.  Minimally invasive techniques for the management of lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Anthony T Yeung; Christopher A Yeung
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Patient-based outcomes for the operative treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Samo K Fokter; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Endoscopic transforaminal nucleotomy with foraminoplasty for lumbar disk herniation.

Authors:  Michael Schubert; Thomas Hoogland
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: classification, pathologic anatomy and surgical decompression.

Authors:  C K Lee; W Rauschning; W Glenn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Tubular microdiscectomy: techniques, complication avoidance, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Aaron J Clark; Michael M Safaee; Nickalus R Khan; Matthew T Brown; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.047

9.  Microlumbar discectomy. Is it safe as an outpatient procedure?

Authors:  F Zahrawi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Trends for Spine Surgery for the Elderly: Implications for Access to Healthcare in North America.

Authors:  Thomas M O'Lynnger; Scott L Zuckerman; Peter J Morone; Michael C Dewan; Raul A Vasquez-Castellanos; Joseph S Cheng
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  14 in total

1.  Expandable Interbody Fusion Cages: An Editorial on the Surgeon's Perspective on Recent Technological Advances and Their Biomechanical Implications.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Lisa Ferrara; Boyle Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

2.  Patient education in an ambulatory surgical center setting.

Authors:  Philip J York; Catherine Himo Gang; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

Review 3.  Future endeavors in ambulatory spine surgery.

Authors:  Avani S Vaishnav; Steven J McAnany
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

Review 4.  Current trends in ambulatory spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Edward M DelSole; Heeren S Makanji; Mark F Kurd
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

5.  Subsidence induced recurrent radiculopathy after staged two-level standalone endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion with a threaded cylindrical cage: a case report.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Nicholas A Ransom; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

6.  Use of "Inside-Out" Technique for Direct Visualization of a Vacuum Vertically Unstable Intervertebral Disc During Routine Lumbar Endoscopic Transforaminal Decompression-A Correlative Study of Clinical Outcomes and the Prognostic Value of Lumbar Radiographs.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-10-31

7.  Return to work and recovery time analysis after outpatient endoscopic lumbar transforaminal decompression surgery.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Nicholas A Ransom; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

8.  Patient selection protocols for endoscopic transforaminal, interlaminar, and translaminar decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Álvaro Dowling; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Fabio Henrique Pinto da Silva; Jaime Andrés Araneda Parra; Daniela Molero Portillo; Yohanna Carolina Pineda Giménez
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

9.  Clinical outcomes with endoscopic resection of lumbar extradural cysts.

Authors:  Stefan Hellinger; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

10.  Outcomes with transforaminal endoscopic versus percutaneous laser decompression for contained lumbar herniated disc: a survival analysis of treatment benefit.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Paulo Sérgio Teixeira de Carvalho; André Luiz Calderaro; Thiago Soares Dos Santos; Marlon Sudário de Lima E Silva; Paulo de Carvalho; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.