Literature DB >> 31656867

Future endeavors in ambulatory spine surgery.

Avani S Vaishnav1, Steven J McAnany1,2.   

Abstract

Due to the high societal and financial burden of spinal disorders, spine surgery is thought to be one of the most impactful targets for healthcare cost reduction. One avenue for cost-reduction that is increasingly being explored not just in spine surgery but across specialties is the performance of surgeries in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). Despite potential cost-savings, the utilization of ASCs for spine surgery remains largely limited to high-volume centers in the US, and predominantly for single- or two-level lumbar microdiscectomy and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. Factors most commonly cited for the lack of wider adoption include the risk of life-threatening complications, paucity of guidelines, and limited accessibility of these procedures to various patient populations. Thus, the future growth and adoption of ambulatory spine surgery depends on addressing these concerns by developing evidence-based guidelines for patient- and procedure selection, creating risk-stratification tools, devising appropriate discharge recommendations, and optimizing care protocols to ensure that safety, efficacy and outcomes are maintained. Other avenues that may allow for more widespread use of ASCs include the use of electronic health tools for post-operative monitoring after discharge from the ASC, increasing accessibility of ambulatory procedures to eligible populations, and identifying systemic inefficiencies and implementing process-improvement measures to optimize patient-selection, scheduling and peri-operative management. The success of ambulatory surgery ultimately depends not only on the surgical procedure, but also on its organization upstream and downstream. It provides an exciting and burgeoning avenue for innovation, cost-reduction and value-creation. 2019 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory surgery; accessibility; ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs); guideline; risk-stratification

Year:  2019        PMID: 31656867      PMCID: PMC6790808          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.09.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  44 in total

1.  Much ado about (doing) nothing.

Authors:  Brendan M Reilly; Arthur T Evans
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Lumbar microdiscectomy as a day-case procedure: Scope for improvement?

Authors:  Neeraj Ahuja; Himanshu Sharma
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.392

3.  Anticipated Changes in Spine Practice with Advancing Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services-Required Changes.

Authors:  Karin R Swartz; Joseph S Cheng
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Clinical Outcomes of Outpatient Cervical Total Disc Replacement Compared With Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Kingsley R Chin; Fabio J R Pencle; Jason A Seale; Franz K Pencle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Ambulatory Surgery Centers: Patient Selection and Outcome Measures Compared With an Inhospital Cohort.

Authors:  Kingsley R Chin; Fabio J R Pencle; André V Coombs; Morgan D Brown; Kasey J Conklin; Andew M O'Neill; Michael J McGarry; Jason A Seale; Elijah A Hothem
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Inpatient versus Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Perioperative Complication Analysis of 259,414 Patients From the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Databases.

Authors:  Shearwood McClelland; Peter G Passias; Thomas J Errico; R Shay Bess; Themistocles S Protopsaltis
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-04-03

7.  The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study.

Authors:  Damian Hoy; Lyn March; Peter Brooks; Fiona Blyth; Anthony Woolf; Christopher Bain; Gail Williams; Emma Smith; Theo Vos; Jan Barendregt; Chris Murray; Roy Burstein; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 8.  Outpatient spine surgery: defining the outcomes, value, and barriers to implementation.

Authors:  Arjun Vivek Pendharkar; Maryam Nour Shahin; Allen Lin Ho; Eric Scott Sussman; David Arnold Purger; Anand Veeravagu; John Kevin Ratliff; Atman Mukesh Desai
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.047

9.  Safety and feasibility of outpatient ACDF in an ambulatory setting: A retrospective chart review.

Authors:  William C Tally; Sanjiwan Tarabadkar; Boris V Kovalenko
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2013-12-01

10.  Outpatient Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Population-Based Analysis of Trends and Complication Rates.

Authors:  Armin Arshi; Howard Y Park; Gideon W Blumstein; Christopher Wang; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang; Arya N Shamie; Don Y Park
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.241

View more
  2 in total

1.  Safety of Anterior Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in the Ambulatory Setting: an Eastern European Experience.

Authors:  Artsiom Klimko; Dragos Bouros; Isabella Mindea; Stefan Mindea
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2022-03

2.  Comparison of the Safety of Outpatient Cervical Disc Replacement With Inpatient Cervical Disc Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaofei Wang; Yang Meng; Hao Liu; Ying Hong; Beiyu Wang; Chen Ding; Yi Yang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.