Literature DB >> 16369827

Patient-based outcomes for the operative treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Samo K Fokter1, Scott A Yerby.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective surgical case series was conducted using a condition-specific, patient-based outcomes assessment.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to describe the outcome predictors of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical decompression is the recommended treatment for patients with moderate to severe DLSS. Previous studies have reported that factors such as the number of operated levels and patient health status are predictors of surgical outcomes.
METHODS: This study analyzed the success rates of 58 DLSS patients treated with decompressive surgery. Outcomes were measured with the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) completed pre-operatively and at least 12 months post-operatively (range 12-54 months). The ZCQ includes three distinct domains that involve symptom severity, physical function, and patient satisfaction. Variables such as age, sex, pre-operative symptom severity, and arthrodesis were analyzed as predictors of success.
RESULTS: The study group included 21 males and 37 females, and the mean age of all patients was 66 years (range 41-80 years). Overall, 63.8% of the patients had significant clinical improvement in Symptom Severity, 55.2% had significant clinical improvement in Physical Function, and 58.6% of the patients were at least somewhat satisfied; 63.8% (37/58) of the patients were considered to be clinically successful. Patients with more severe pre-operative symptoms and more physical function restrictions had better success results than those patients with milder symptoms and less restrictive physical function. Also, patients who were followed for less than 24 months had better success than those followed for more than 24 months. There was no significant difference in the clinical success rates of (1) patients who were fused and those not fused, (2) males and females, (3) patients aged less than 65 years and those greater than 65 years, and (4) patients who were treated at one or two levels and those treated at three or four levels.
CONCLUSION: The results of this retrospective study indicate that operative decompression of the lumbar spine offers significant improvement for patients with DLSS. Although not all comparisons were statistically significant, there was a trend for DLLS patients aged less than 65 years with more severe pre-operative symptoms and physical function disturbances treated at one or two levels with a laminectomy and fusion to have the best outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16369827     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0033-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  51 in total

1.  Long-term disability and return to work among patients who have a herniated lumbar disc: the effect of disability compensation.

Authors:  S J Atlas; Y Chang; E Kammann; R B Keller; R A Deyo; D E Singer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  When is spinal fusion warranted in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis?

Authors:  J Brunon; J Chazal; J P Chirossel; J P Houteville; J Lagarrigue; D Legars; J J Moreau; G Perrin; M Tremoulet
Journal:  Rev Rhum Engl Ed       Date:  1996-01

3.  Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  A C Simotas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results.

Authors:  James F Zucherman; Ken Y Hsu; Charles A Hartjen; Thomas F Mehalic; Dante A Implicito; Michael J Martin; Donald R Johnson; Grant A Skidmore; Paul P Vessa; James W Dwyer; Stephen T Puccio; Joseph C Cauthen; Richard M Ozuna
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  J N Katz; S J Lipson; R A Lew; L J Grobler; J N Weinstein; G W Brick; A H Fossel; M H Liang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis and stabilization with Knodt rods in the elderly patient.

Authors:  F K Conley; C T Cady; R E Lieberson
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population.

Authors:  R A Deyo; M A Ciol; D C Cherkin; J D Loeser; S J Bigos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Decompression with and without arthrodesis.

Authors:  D Grob; T Humke; J Dvorak
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  K E Johnsson; S Willner; K Johnsson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Complications of spinal fusion in adult patients more than 60 years of age.

Authors:  T Fujita; J P Kostuik; C B Huckell; A N Sieber
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  24 in total

1.  Lumbar spine fusion surgery and stroke: a national cohort study.

Authors:  Jau-Ching Wu; Yu-Chun Chen; Laura Liu; Wen-Cheng Huang; Peck-Foong Thien; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Henrich Cheng; Su-Shun Lo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Effect of fusion following decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Lin Liang; Wei-Min Jiang; Xue-Feng Li; Heng Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

3.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian version of the spinal stenosis measure.

Authors:  Elisabeth Thornes; Margreth Grotle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the German version of the spinal stenosis measure.

Authors:  Maria M Wertli; Johann Steurer; Lukas M Wildi; Ulrike Held
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Decreased tibial nerve movement in patients with failed back surgery syndrome and persistent leg pain.

Authors:  G Shum; S Cinnamond; M Hutton; D Chan; R Chauhan; S Bloxham; S Choy; R Cheung; S Eldabe; A Clarke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Predominant leg pain is associated with better surgical outcomes in degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis: results from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

Authors:  Adam Pearson; Emily Blood; Jon Lurie; William Abdu; Dilip Sengupta; John W Frymoyer; James Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A comparison between different outcome measures based on "meaningful important differences" in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Maria M Wertli; Franziska Christina Buletti; Ulrike Held; Eva Rasmussen-Barr; Sherri Weiser; Jakob M Burgstaller; Johann Steurer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Banu Alicioglu; Baris Yilmaz; Nail Bulakbasi; Cem Copuroglu; Erol Yalniz; Bilal Aykac; Devrim Ulas Urut
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 9.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment.

Authors:  Eberhard Siebert; Harald Prüss; Randolf Klingebiel; Vieri Failli; Karl M Einhäupl; Jan M Schwab
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 42.937

10.  Incidence, Management, and Cost of Complications After Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Foraminal and Lateral Recess Stenosis: A Value Proposition for Outpatient Ambulatory Surgery.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.