Literature DB >> 12914268

Lumbar spinal stenosis. Treatment strategies and indications for surgery.

Dilip K Sengupta1, Harry N Herkowitz.   

Abstract

Initially, all patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis should be treated conservatively. Rapid deterioration is unlikely. The majority of patients may either improve or remain stable over a long-term follow-up with nonoperative treatment. Surgery should be an elective decision by the patients who fail to improve after conservative treatment. Medical evaluation is mandatory in those elderly patients with frequent comorbidities. For central spinal stenosis, without significant grade I spondylolisthesis or deformity, decompression is the surgical treatment of choice. Iatrogenic instability must be avoided during decompression surgery by preserving the facet joint and the pars interarticularis. Limited decompression with laminotomy may be indicated for lateral canal stenosis. A limited decompression may avoid postoperative instability but is associated with more frequent neurologic sequelae. Postlaminectomy instability is uncommon, and too little decompression is a more frequent mistake than too much. Decompression is usually associated with good or excellent outcome in 80% of patients. Deterioration of initial post-operative improvement may occur over long-term follow-up. When spinal stenosis is associated with instability, degenerative spondylolisthesis, deformity, postoperative instability, or recurrent stenosis, fusion is often recommended. Instrumentation often improves the fusion rate but does not influence the clinical outcome. Generous decompression but selective fusion of the unstable segment only are preferable for degenerative spondylolisthesis and type I degenerative scoliosis with minimal rotation of the spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12914268     DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(02)00069-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  43 in total

1.  Minimally invasive laminectomy in spondylolisthetic lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  Ilias N Caralopoulos; Cuong J Bui
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

2.  Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Halit Cavuşoğlu; Ramazan Alper Kaya; Osman Nuri Türkmenoglu; Cengiz Tuncer; Ibrahim Colak; Yunus Aydin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Decompression with or without concomitant fusion in lumbar stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review.

Authors:  M L Dijkerman; G M Overdevest; W A Moojen; C L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: long-term results.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Kosmas S Stafilas; Anastasios V Korompilias; Konstantinos C Zacharis; Alexandros E Beris; Theodoros A Xenakis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Surgery in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: indications, outcomes and complications. A systematic review.

Authors:  F Steiger; H-J Becker; C J Standaert; F Balague; J-P Vader; F Porchet; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Mechanical low back pain--a rheumatologist's view.

Authors:  David Borenstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 20.543

7.  Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a Single Oblique PEEK Cage and Posterior Supplemental Fixation.

Authors:  Álvaro Dowling; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

Review 8.  Achondroplasia: a comprehensive clinical review.

Authors:  Richard M Pauli
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 4.123

9.  Lumbar spinal stenosis with exacerbation of back pain with extension: a potential contraindication for supine MRI with sedation.

Authors:  Alan Kuramoto; Linda Chang; Jon Graham; Stephen Holmes
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  The efficacy of physical therapy and physical therapy plus calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Fusun Sahin; Figen Yilmaz; Nurdan Kotevoglu; Banu Kuran
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.