Literature DB >> 33122184

Expandable Interbody Fusion Cages: An Editorial on the Surgeon's Perspective on Recent Technological Advances and Their Biomechanical Implications.

Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski1, Lisa Ferrara2, Boyle Cheng3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Expandable cages have gone through several iterations since they first appeared on the market in the early 2000s. Their development was prompted by some common problems associated with static interbody cages, including migration, expulsion, dural or neural traction injury, and pseudarthrosis.
OBJECTIVE: To summarize current technological advances from earlier expandable lumbar interbody fusion devices to implants with vertical and medial-to-lateral expansion mechanisms.
METHODS: The authors review the currently available expandable cage designs, the incremental technological advances, and how these devices impact minimally invasive surgery interbody procedures and clinical outcomes. The strategic concepts intended to improve the minimally invasive application of expandable interbody fusion implants are reviewed from a surgeon's perspective in a clinical context to discuss how their use may improve patient outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The geometrical configuration, effective stiffness of composite multi-material cage designs may impact the bone-implant contact area with the endplates. Hybridization strategies of expandable cage technology with modern minimally invasive and endoscopic spinal surgery techniques are presented by outlining their advantages and disadvantages. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Systematic review. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
Copyright © 2020 ISASS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cage; expandable; interbody fusion

Year:  2020        PMID: 33122184      PMCID: PMC7735473          DOI: 10.14444/7127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  47 in total

1.  [Preliminary clinical results of endoscopic discectomy followed by interbody fusion using B-Twin expandable spinal spacer].

Authors:  Xifeng Zhang; Yan Wang; Songhua Xiao; Zhengsheng Liu; Baowei Liu; Yonggang Zhang; Shourong Zhu; Ning Lu; Zheng Wang; Keya Mao; Xuesong Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2011-10

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of a novel lumbosacral axial fixation device.

Authors:  Eric H Ledet; Michael P Tymeson; Simon Salerno; Allen L Carl; Andrew Cragg
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 3.  Assessing the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable Cage and Nonexpandable Cage Among Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Ali Alvi; Shyam J Kurian; Waseem Wahood; Anshit Goyal; Benjamin D Elder; Mohamad Bydon
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Successful outcome after outpatient transforaminal decompression for lumbar foraminal and lateral recess stenosis: The positive predictive value of diagnostic epidural steroid injection.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 1.876

5.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.

Authors:  Ammar H Hawasli; Jawad M Khalifeh; Ajay Chatrath; Chester K Yarbrough; Wilson Z Ray
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 6.  The VariLift(®) Interbody Fusion System: expandable, standalone interbody fusion.

Authors:  Erik Emstad; Diana Cardenas Del Monaco; Louis C Fielding; Jon E Block
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-05-26

7.  Multiexpandable cage for minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Coe; James F Zucherman; Donald W Kucharzyk; Kornelis A Poelstra; Larry E Miller; Sandeep Kunwar
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-09-28

8.  Minimally invasive procedure reduces adjacent segment degeneration and disease: New benefit-based global meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Chuan Li; Chun-Ming Huang; Cheng-Fan Zhong; Rong-Wei Liang; Shao-Jian Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Incidence, Management, and Cost of Complications After Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Foraminal and Lateral Recess Stenosis: A Value Proposition for Outpatient Ambulatory Surgery.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-02-22

10.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable cages: Radiological and clinical results of banana-shaped and straight implants.

Authors:  Tjark Tassemeier; Marcel Haversath; Marcus Jäger
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
View more
  1 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Poor Bone Quality, Multilevel Surgery, and Narrow and Tall Cages Are Associated with Intraoperative Endplate Injuries and Late-onset Cage Subsidence in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sergio A Mendoza-Lattes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.