Literature DB >> 30273715

A simple geometric analysis method for measuring and mitigating RF induced currents on Deep Brain Stimulation leads by multichannel transmission/reception.

Yigitcan Eryaman1, Naoharu Kobayashi2, Sean Moen2, Joshua Aman3, Andrea Grant2, J Thomas Vaughan4, Gregory Molnar3, Michael C Park5, Jerrold Vitek3, Gregor Adriany2, Kamil Ugurbil2, Noam Harel2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to present a new method that can be used to estimate and mitigate RF induced currents on Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) leads. Here, we demonstrate the effect of RF induced current mitigation on both RF heating and image quality for a variety of brain MRI sequences at 3 T. We acquired pre-scan images around a DBS lead (in-situ and ex-vivo) using conventional Gradient Echo Sequence (GRE) accelerated by parallel imaging (i.e GRAPPA) and quantified the magnitude and phase of RF induced current using the relative location of the B1+ null with respect to the lead position. We estimated the RF induced current on a DBS lead implanted in a gel phantom as well as in a cadaver head study for a variety of RF excitation patterns. We also measured the increase in tip temperature using fiber-optic probes for both phantom and cadaver studies. Using the magnitude and phase information of the current induced separately by two transmit channels of the body coil, we calculated an implant friendly (IF) excitation. Using the IF excitation, we acquired T1, T2 weighted Turbo Spin Echo (TSE), T2 weighted SPACE-Dark Fluid, and Ultra Short Echo Time (UTE) sequences around the lead. Our induced current estimation demonstrated linear relationship between the magnitude of the induced current and the square root SAR at the tip of the lead as measured in phantom studies. The "IF excitation pattern" calculated after the pre-scan mitigated RF artifacts and increased the image quality around the lead. In addition, it reduced the tip temperature significantly in both phantom and cadaver studies compared to a conventional quadrature excitation while keeping equivalent overall image quality. We present a relatively fast method that can be used to calculate implant friendly excitation, reducing image artifacts as well as the temperature around the DBS electrodes. When combined with a variety of MR sequences, the proposed method can improve the image quality and patient safety in clinical imaging scenarios.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep Brain Stimulation; Image artifacts; MR safety; RF heating

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30273715      PMCID: PMC6814167          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  23 in total

1.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Assessment of brain shift related to deep brain stimulation surgery.

Authors:  Muhammad Faisal Khan; Klaus Mewes; Robert E Gross; Oskar Skrinjar
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 1.875

3.  Reduction of the radiofrequency heating of metallic devices using a dual-drive birdcage coil.

Authors:  Yigitcan Eryaman; Esra Abaci Turk; Cagdas Oto; Oktay Algin; Ergin Atalar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging conditionally safe neurostimulation leads: investigation of the maximum safe lead tip temperature.

Authors:  Robert J Coffey; Ron Kalin; James M Olsen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Controlling radiofrequency-induced currents in guidewires using parallel transmit.

Authors:  Maryam Etezadi-Amoli; Pascal Stang; Adam Kerr; John Pauly; Greig Scott
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Polarized multichannel transmit MRI to reduce shading near metal implants.

Authors:  Theresa J Bachschmidt; Michael Köhler; Jürgen Nistler; Christian Geppert; Peter M Jakob; Mathias Nittka
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Construction and modeling of a reconfigurable MRI coil for lowering SAR in patients with deep brain stimulation implants.

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Maria Ida Iacono; Boris Keil; Leonardo M Angelone; Giorgio Bonmassar; Michael D Fox; Todd Herrington; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Cristen LaPierre; Azma Mareyam; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Feasibility of using linearly polarized rotating birdcage transmitters and close-fitting receive arrays in MRI to reduce SAR in the vicinity of deep brain simulation implants.

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Boris Keil; Leonardo M Angelone; Giorgio Bonmassar; Azma Mareyam; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Permanent neurological deficit related to magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes for Parkinson's disease: case report.

Authors:  Jaimie M Henderson; Jean Tkach; Michael Phillips; Kenneth Baker; Frank G Shellock; Ali R Rezai
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Semi-automatic stereotactic coordinate identification algorithm for routine localization of Deep Brain Stimulation electrodes.

Authors:  Adam O Hebb; Kai J Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  [MR safety assessment of active implanted medical devices. German version].

Authors:  Sarra Aissani; Elmar Laistler; Jacques Felblinger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  MR safety assessment of active implantable medical devices.

Authors:  Sarra Aissani; Elmar Laistler; Jacques Felblinger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Parallel Transmission for Ultrahigh Field MRI.

Authors:  Cem M Deniz
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-06

Review 4.  Improving Safety of MRI in Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Alexandre Boutet; Clement T Chow; Keshav Narang; Gavin J B Elias; Clemens Neudorfer; Jürgen Germann; Manish Ranjan; Aaron Loh; Alastair J Martin; Walter Kucharczyk; Christopher J Steele; Ileana Hancu; Ali R Rezai; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Reconfigurable MRI technology for low-SAR imaging of deep brain stimulation at 3T: Application in bilateral leads, fully-implanted systems, and surgically modified lead trajectories.

Authors:  Ehsan Kazemivalipour; Boris Keil; Alireza Vali; Sunder Rajan; Behzad Elahi; Ergin Atalar; Lawrence L Wald; Joshua Rosenow; Julie Pilitsis; Laleh Golestanirad
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Parallel transmission to reduce absorbed power around deep brain stimulation devices in MRI: Impact of number and arrangement of transmit channels.

Authors:  Bastien Guerin; Leonardo M Angelone; Darin Dougherty; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Vertical open-bore MRI scanners generate significantly less radiofrequency heating around implanted leads: A study of deep brain stimulation implants in 1.2T OASIS scanners versus 1.5T horizontal systems.

Authors:  Ehsan Kazemivalipour; Bhumi Bhusal; Jasmine Vu; Stella Lin; Bach Thanh Nguyen; John Kirsch; Elizabeth Nowac; Julie Pilitsis; Joshua Rosenow; Ergin Atalar; Laleh Golestanirad
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.737

8.  Reconfigurable MRI coil technology can substantially reduce RF heating of deep brain stimulation implants: First in-vitro study of RF heating reduction in bilateral DBS leads at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Ehsan Kazemivalipour; Boris Keil; Sean Downs; John Kirsch; Behzad Elahi; Julie Pilitsis; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Safe guidewire visualization using the modes of a PTx transmit array MR system.

Authors:  Felipe Godinez; Greig Scott; Francesco Padormo; Joseph V Hajnal; Shaihan J Malik
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.737

10.  Modeling radiofrequency responses of realistic multi-electrode leads containing helical and straight wires.

Authors:  Mikhail Kozlov; Marc Horner; Wolfgang Kainz
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.