Robert J Coffey1, Ron Kalin, James M Olsen. 1. *Research, Clinical, and Medical Safety, Medtronic Neuromodulation, Minneapolis, Minnesota; ‡Research, Medtronic Neuromodulation, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is preferred for imaging the central nervous system (CNS). An important hazard for neurostimulation patients is heating at the electrode interface induced, for example, by 64-MHz radiofrequency (RF) magnetic fields of a 1.5T scanner. OBJECTIVE: We performed studies to define the thermal dose (time and temperature) that would not cause symptomatic neurological injury. METHODS: Approaches included animal studies where leads with temperature probes were implanted in the brain or spine of sheep and exposed to RF-induced temperatures of 37 °C to 49 °C for 30 minutes. Histopathological examinations were performed 7 days after recovery. We also reviewed the threshold for RF lesions in the CNS, and for CNS injury from cancer hyperthermia. Cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C was used to normalize the data to exposure times and temperatures expected during MRI. RESULTS: Deep brain and spinal RF heating up to 43 °C for 30 minutes produced indistinguishable effects compared with 37 °C controls. Exposures greater than 43 °C for 30 minutes produced temperature-dependent, localized thermal damage. These results are consistent with limits on hyperthermia exposure to 41.8 °C for 60 minutes in patients who have cancer and with the reversibility of low-temperature and short-duration trial heating during RF lesion procedures. CONCLUSION: A safe temperature for induced lead heating is 43 °C for 30 minutes. MRI-related RF heating above 43 °C or longer than 30 minutes may be associated with increased risk of clinically evident thermal damage to neural structures immediately surrounding implanted leads. The establishment of a thermal dose limit is a first step toward making specific neurostimulation systems conditionally safe during MRI procedures.
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is preferred for imaging the central nervous system (CNS). An important hazard for neurostimulation patients is heating at the electrode interface induced, for example, by 64-MHz radiofrequency (RF) magnetic fields of a 1.5T scanner. OBJECTIVE: We performed studies to define the thermal dose (time and temperature) that would not cause symptomatic neurological injury. METHODS: Approaches included animal studies where leads with temperature probes were implanted in the brain or spine of sheep and exposed to RF-induced temperatures of 37 °C to 49 °C for 30 minutes. Histopathological examinations were performed 7 days after recovery. We also reviewed the threshold for RF lesions in the CNS, and for CNS injury from cancer hyperthermia. Cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C was used to normalize the data to exposure times and temperatures expected during MRI. RESULTS: Deep brain and spinal RF heating up to 43 °C for 30 minutes produced indistinguishable effects compared with 37 °C controls. Exposures greater than 43 °C for 30 minutes produced temperature-dependent, localized thermal damage. These results are consistent with limits on hyperthermia exposure to 41.8 °C for 60 minutes in patients who have cancer and with the reversibility of low-temperature and short-duration trial heating during RF lesion procedures. CONCLUSION: A safe temperature for induced lead heating is 43 °C for 30 minutes. MRI-related RF heating above 43 °C or longer than 30 minutes may be associated with increased risk of clinically evident thermal damage to neural structures immediately surrounding implanted leads. The establishment of a thermal dose limit is a first step toward making specific neurostimulation systems conditionally safe during MRI procedures.
Authors: Sean Owens; M Arcan Erturk; Jean-Pierre P Ouanes; Jamie D Murphy; Christopher L Wu; Paul A Bottomley Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2014 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Mehul J Desai; Liesl M Hargens; Maria D Breitenfeldt; Alissa H Doth; Michael P Ryan; Candace Gunnarsson; Yair Safriel Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: F Tek; S MüLler; E Boga; H B Gehl; D Seitz; L U Scholtz; H Sudhoff; I Todt Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.124