Literature DB >> 24176957

Magnetic resonance imaging conditionally safe neurostimulation leads: investigation of the maximum safe lead tip temperature.

Robert J Coffey1, Ron Kalin, James M Olsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is preferred for imaging the central nervous system (CNS). An important hazard for neurostimulation patients is heating at the electrode interface induced, for example, by 64-MHz radiofrequency (RF) magnetic fields of a 1.5T scanner.
OBJECTIVE: We performed studies to define the thermal dose (time and temperature) that would not cause symptomatic neurological injury.
METHODS: Approaches included animal studies where leads with temperature probes were implanted in the brain or spine of sheep and exposed to RF-induced temperatures of 37 °C to 49 °C for 30 minutes. Histopathological examinations were performed 7 days after recovery. We also reviewed the threshold for RF lesions in the CNS, and for CNS injury from cancer hyperthermia. Cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C was used to normalize the data to exposure times and temperatures expected during MRI.
RESULTS: Deep brain and spinal RF heating up to 43 °C for 30 minutes produced indistinguishable effects compared with 37 °C controls. Exposures greater than 43 °C for 30 minutes produced temperature-dependent, localized thermal damage. These results are consistent with limits on hyperthermia exposure to 41.8 °C for 60 minutes in patients who have cancer and with the reversibility of low-temperature and short-duration trial heating during RF lesion procedures.
CONCLUSION: A safe temperature for induced lead heating is 43 °C for 30 minutes. MRI-related RF heating above 43 °C or longer than 30 minutes may be associated with increased risk of clinically evident thermal damage to neural structures immediately surrounding implanted leads. The establishment of a thermal dose limit is a first step toward making specific neurostimulation systems conditionally safe during MRI procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24176957     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of epidural and peripheral nerve catheter heating during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sean Owens; M Arcan Erturk; Jean-Pierre P Ouanes; Jamie D Murphy; Christopher L Wu; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  A simple geometric analysis method for measuring and mitigating RF induced currents on Deep Brain Stimulation leads by multichannel transmission/reception.

Authors:  Yigitcan Eryaman; Naoharu Kobayashi; Sean Moen; Joshua Aman; Andrea Grant; J Thomas Vaughan; Gregory Molnar; Michael C Park; Jerrold Vitek; Gregor Adriany; Kamil Ugurbil; Noam Harel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The rate of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Mehul J Desai; Liesl M Hargens; Maria D Breitenfeldt; Alissa H Doth; Michael P Ryan; Candace Gunnarsson; Yair Safriel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Do we need to establish guidelines for patients with neuromodulation implantable devices, including spinal cord stimulators undergoing nonspinal surgeries?

Authors:  Ramsis F Ghaly; Tatiana Tverdohleb; Kenneth D Candido; Nebojsa Nick Knezevic
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-02-15

5.  Modeling radiofrequency responses of realistic multi-electrode leads containing helical and straight wires.

Authors:  Mikhail Kozlov; Marc Horner; Wolfgang Kainz
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  3T MRI-based estimation of scalar cochlear implant electrode position.

Authors:  F Tek; S MüLler; E Boga; H B Gehl; D Seitz; L U Scholtz; H Sudhoff; I Todt
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.124

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.