Literature DB >> 27079838

Prospective comparative study of two methods for fixation after distal femur corrective osteotomy for valgus deformity; retrograde intramedullary nailing versus less invasive stabilization system plating.

Çağrı Özcan1, Sami Sökücü2, Kubilay Beng2, Engin Çetinkaya2, Bilal Demir2, Yavuz Selim Kabukçuoğlu2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the radiological and functional results of two different methods of fixation for the correction of femoral valgus deformities.
METHODS: Patients who had undergone osteotomy and correction of a valgus deformity from 2007 to 2013 were prospectively followed. Thirty three patients (20 females, 13 males) with 39 lower limbs were included in the study. Seventeen lower limbs were treated with retrograde intramedullary nailing (IMN) and 22 with less invasive stabilization system plating. Standing orthoroentgenograms of the lower limbs were taken pre-operatively and at the final follow-up. mLDFA, aLDFA, mechanical axis deviation (MAD) were measured in this orthoroentgenograms. Knee osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and knee range of motion were used pre-operatively and at the final follow-up as part of the evaluation of the clinical results. All patients duration of surgery, length of hospital stay were assessed. Operations were performed by two orthopedic surgeons. The choice of correction method for each patient was determined by the surgeon. Pre-operative and post-operative values were simultaneously measured by two additional orthopedic surgeons.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 26.2 years (18.0-51.0) in the plating group and 29.3 years (18.0-55.0) in the nailing group. Patients in the plating and nailing groups were followed up for 24.0 (12.0-60.0) and 27.8 (12.0-60.0) months. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of age, sex, or duration of follow-up (p > 0.05) Comparison of the pre- and post-operative mLDFA, aLDFA, MAD, length of hospital stay, and duration of surgery between the plating group and nailing group, no significant difference was observed between the groups (p > 0.05). However, patients treated with retrograde IMN had significantly better post-operative results in terms of the KOOS and range of motion of the knee according to plating group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Retrograde IMN does not provide a radiological advantage over the LISS plating technique for valgus deformity but retrograde IMN and correction offered better functional results in cases of femoral valgus deformity than did the LISS plating method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deformity; Femur distal osteotomy; Valgus deformity; Valgus knee

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27079838     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3190-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

1.  Distal femoral varus osteotomy for valgus deformity of the knee.

Authors:  A G McDermott; J A Finklestein; I Farine; E L Boynton; D L MacIntosh; A Gross
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Distal femoral varus osteotomy.

Authors:  W L Healy; J O Anglen; S A Wasilewski; K A Krackow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Rate of correction after asymmetrical physeal suppression in valgus deformity: analysis using a linear mixed model application.

Authors:  Ki Hyuk Sung; Soyeon Ahn; Chin Youb Chung; Kyoung Min Lee; Tae Won Kim; Ho Sung Han; Dae Ha Kim; In Ho Choi; Tae-Joon Cho; Won Joon Yoo; Moon Seok Park
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.324

4.  Midterm results following medial closed wedge distal femoral osteotomy stabilized with a locking internal fixation device.

Authors:  Philipp Forkel; Andrea Achtnich; Sebastian Metzlaff; Thore Zantop; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using a locking compression plate for distal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Ravi M Nayak; M R Koichade; Alok N Umre; Milind V Ingle
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.118

6.  Biomechanical analysis of supracondylar femoral fractures fixed with modern retrograde intramedullary nails.

Authors:  N Hora; D C Markel; A Haynes; M J Grimm
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Distal femoral varus osteotomy outcome: Is associated femoropatellar osteoarthritis consequential?

Authors:  A Zarrouk; R Bouzidi; B Karray; S Kammoun; S Mourali; M Kooli
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 8.  Total knee arthroplasty in the valgus knee.

Authors:  Roberto Rossi; Federica Rosso; Umberto Cottino; Federico Dettoni; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Matteo Bruzzone
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Which osteotomy for a valgus knee?

Authors:  Giancarlo Puddu; Massimo Cipolla; Guglielmo Cerullo; Vittorio Franco; Enrico Giannì
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ewa M Roos; L Stefan Lohmander
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  8 in total

1.  Outcomes of distal femur fractures treated with the Synthes 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate.

Authors:  Khang H Dang; Connor A Armstrong; Ravi A Karia; Boris A Zelle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comment on Özcan. et al.: prospective comparative study of two methods for fixation after distal femur corrective osteotomy for valgus deformity; retrograde intramedullary nailing versus less invasive stabilization system plating.

Authors:  Lu Wan; Feng Zhou; Dan Peng
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Nonunion and delayed union in lateral open wedge distal femoral osteotomies-a legitimate concern?

Authors:  Franz Liska; Andreas Voss; Florian B Imhoff; Lukas Willinger; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Lateral locked plating for distal femur fractures by low-energy trauma: what makes a difference in healing?

Authors:  Sang-Min Kim; Jae-Woo Yeom; Hyung Keun Song; Kyu-Tae Hwang; Ji-Hyo Hwang; Je-Hyun Yoo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Deformity correction with total knee arthroplasty for severe knee osteoarthritis accompanying extra-articular femoral deformity: the results are promising.

Authors:  B Demir; B Özkul; M S Saygılı; E Çetinkaya; D Akbulut
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Distal femoral varus osteotomy: results of the lateral open-wedge technique without bone grafting.

Authors:  Alexander Kolb; Verena Isak; Gerhard M Hobusch; Catharina Chiari; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  A Preliminary Comparison Suggests Poor Performance of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Versus Titanium Plates in Distal Femoral Osteotomy.

Authors:  Austin T Fragomen; Thomas H McCoy; Fiona R Fragomen
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-12-07

8.  Outcome of Dome Osteotomy With Plate Osteosynthesis for Genu Valgum in Late Adolescents and Young Adults.

Authors:  Kuldeep Bansal; Puneet Mishra; Manish Chadha; Pratyush Shahi; Rahul Anshuman; Aditya N Aggarwal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.